Literature DB >> 22124386

Differentiation of benign from malignant liver masses with Acoustic Radiation Force Impulse technique.

Hojun Yu1, Stephanie R Wilson.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to determine the performance of Acoustic Radiation Force Impulse (ARFI) imaging to differentiate benign from malignant liver masses, both of hepatocellular origin and metastases, by quantification of their stiffness.
METHODS: This study has institutional review board approval and informed consent. Eighty-nine patients (42 female and 47 male patients) with 105 liver masses had ARFI evaluation on ultrasound, S2000 (Siemens, Mountain View, Calif). Mean age of the patients was 53.67 years (range, 27-83 years). Mean diameter of the masses was 2.77 cm (range, 1.0-13.0 cm). Final diagnoses, confirmed by imaging on contrast-enhanced computed tomography, magnetic resonance, or ultrasound or biopsy, include hepatocellular carcinoma (n = 28), metastasis (n = 13), hemangioma (n = 35), focal nodular hyperplasia (n = 15), focal fat sparing (n = 8), focal fat deposit (n = 4), and adenoma (n = 2). Receiver operating characteristic analysis was performed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of the ARFI measurement and to extract the optimal cutoff values in the differentiation of benign from malignant disease.
RESULTS: Acoustic Radiation Force Impulse values showed a statistically significant difference between benign (1.73 [SD, 0.8] m/sec) and malignant masses (2.57 [SD, 1.01] m/sec) (P < 0.001). However, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.744, suggesting only fair accuracy. For differentiation of malignant from benign masses, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were 68% (28/41), 69% (44/64), 58% (28/48), and 77% (44/57), respectively, when 1.9 m/sec was chosen as a cutoff value, reflective of a wide variation of ARFI values in each diagnosis. For differentiation of metastasis from benign masses, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and NPV were 69% (9/13), 89% (57/64), 56% (9/16), and 93% (57/61), respectively, when 2.72 m/sec was chosen as a cutoff value.
CONCLUSIONS: Acoustic Radiation Force Impulse measurement may be helpful to differentiate benign masses from metastases, in particular. Otherwise, ARFI measurements alone do not differentiate benign and malignant masses because of variations in stiffness of all types of masses.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22124386     DOI: 10.1097/RUQ.0b013e318239422e

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultrasound Q        ISSN: 0894-8771            Impact factor:   1.657


  17 in total

1.  Clinical utility of acoustic radiation force impulse imaging for identification of malignant liver lesions: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Li Ying; Xiao Lin; Zuo-Liu Xie; Fei-Yun Tang; Yuan-Ping Hu; Ke-Qing Shi
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2012-07-08       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 2.  Liver elastography, comments on EFSUMB elastography guidelines 2013.

Authors:  Xin-Wu Cui; Mireen Friedrich-Rust; Chiara De Molo; Andre Ignee; Dagmar Schreiber-Dietrich; Christoph F Dietrich
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-10-14       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 3.  How Can New Imaging Modalities Help in the Practice of Radiology?

Authors:  Berhan Pirimoglu; Recep Sade; Hayri Ogul; Mecit Kantarci; Suat Eren; Akın Levent
Journal:  Eurasian J Med       Date:  2016-10

4.  Evaluation of shearwave elastography for the characterisation of focal liver lesions on ultrasound.

Authors:  Aymeric Guibal; Camille Boularan; Matthew Bruce; Mélanie Vallin; Frank Pilleul; Thomas Walter; Jean Yves Scoazec; Nawele Boublay; Jérôme Dumortier; Thibaut Lefort
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2012-11-19       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Elastography for the differentiation of benign and malignant liver lesions: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Xuelei Ma; Wenli Zhan; Binglan Zhang; Benling Wei; Xin Wu; Min Zhou; Lei Liu; Ping Li
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2014-01-05

6.  Characterization of fortuitously discovered focal liver lesions: additional information provided by shearwave elastography.

Authors:  Maxime Ronot; Sara Di Renzo; Bettina Gregoli; Rafael Duran; Laurent Castera; Bernard E Van Beers; Valérie Vilgrain
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2014-09-19       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 7.  Fortuitously discovered liver lesions.

Authors:  Christoph F Dietrich; Malay Sharma; Robert N Gibson; Dagmar Schreiber-Dietrich; Christian Jenssen
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-06-07       Impact factor: 5.742

8.  Differentiation of benign and malignant focal liver lesions: value of virtual touch tissue quantification of acoustic radiation force impulse elastography.

Authors:  Le-Hang Guo; Shu-Jun Wang; Hui-Xiong Xu; Li-Ping Sun; Yi-Feng Zhang; Jun-Mei Xu; Jian Wu; Hui-Jun Fu; Xiao-Hong Xu
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2015-02-19       Impact factor: 3.064

9.  Differentiation of benign from malignant thyroid nodules with acoustic radiation force impulse technique.

Authors:  J Zhuo; Z Ma; W-J Fu; S-P Liu
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2014-02-03       Impact factor: 3.039

10.  Characterization of focal liver masses using acoustic radiation force impulse elastography.

Authors:  Hana Park; Jun Yong Park; Do Young Kim; Sang Hoon Ahn; Chae Yoon Chon; Kwang-Hyub Han; Seung Up Kim
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-01-14       Impact factor: 5.742

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.