Literature DB >> 15699662

Biomechanical testing of alloplastic PMMA cranioplasty materials.

Barry L Eppley1.   

Abstract

Alloplastic cranioplasty techniques using polyfmethylmethacrylate (PMMA) are a common method of restoring lost cranial bone. Numerous compositions of PMMA exist for this application, using either intraoperatively cured solid compositions or preoperatively fabricated porous custom implants. Although all of these PMMA materials feel solid by palpation, the amount of cranial protection that they provide has never been precisely evaluated. Whether differences exist between the differing PMMA cranioplasty materials likewise is unknown. An impact resistance test was performed on uniform-size blocks of differing PMMA materials of representative cranial thickness using American Society of Testing and Materials (ASTM) method D 3029-78. Based on mean failure weights of 3.9 lb (Cranioplast), 4.2 lb (Cranioplexx), and 4.0 lb (HTR polymer), all of these materials are comparatively the same in impact resistance. Precured porous PMMA, despite having 30% to 40% less material, offered no less impact resistance. Based on projections to cranial bone, PMMA materials appear to offer protection similar to that of native osseous tissue.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15699662     DOI: 10.1097/00001665-200501000-00028

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Craniofac Surg        ISSN: 1049-2275            Impact factor:   1.046


  23 in total

1.  Review of bone substitutes.

Authors:  Landon S Pryor; Earl Gage; Claude-Jean Langevin; Fernando Herrera; Andrew D Breithaupt; Chad R Gordon; Ahmed M Afifi; James E Zins; Hal Meltzer; Amanda Gosman; Steve R Cohen; Ralph Holmes
Journal:  Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr       Date:  2009-10

2.  Deformation of a Titanium Calvarial Implant following Trauma: A Case Report.

Authors:  Valerie R De Water; Ellianne J Dos Santos Rubio; Joost W Schouten; Maarten J Koudstaal
Journal:  Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr       Date:  2015-11-05

3.  Intraoperative template-molded bone flap reconstruction for patient-specific cranioplasty.

Authors:  Serge Marbacher; Lukas Andereggen; Salome Erhardt; Ali-Reza Fathi; Javier Fandino; Andreas Raabe; Jürgen Beck
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2012-03-06       Impact factor: 3.042

4.  Hydroxyapatite ceramic implants for cranioplasty in children: a single-center experience.

Authors:  Laura Zaccaria; Sasha Job Tharakan; Stefan Altermatt
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2016-12-24       Impact factor: 1.475

5.  Immediate titanium mesh cranioplasty for treatment of postcraniotomy infections.

Authors:  Joshua J Wind; Chima Ohaegbulam; Fabio M Iwamoto; Peter M Black; John K Park
Journal:  World Neurosurg       Date:  2011-11-07       Impact factor: 2.104

6.  Cranioplasty using presurgically fabricated presterilised polymethyl methacrylate plate by a simple, cost-effective technique on patients with and without original bone flap: study on 29 patients.

Authors:  G M Sharavanan; Suresh Jayabalan; K Rajasukumaran; Ganesh Veerasekar; G Sathya
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2014-08-28

7.  Catcher's mask cranioplasty for extensive cranial defects in children with an open head trauma: a novel application of partial cranioplasty.

Authors:  Ichiro Takumi; Masataka Akimoto
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2008-01-29       Impact factor: 1.475

8.  Improved osteoblast response to UV-irradiated PMMA/TiO2 nanocomposites with controllable wettability.

Authors:  Mahdis Shayan; Youngsoo Jung; Po-Shun Huang; Marzyeh Moradi; Anton Y Plakseychuk; Jung-Kun Lee; Ravi Shankar; Youngjae Chun
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2014-07-30       Impact factor: 3.896

Review 9.  State-of-Art of Standard and Innovative Materials Used in Cranioplasty.

Authors:  Valentina Siracusa; Giuseppe Maimone; Vincenzo Antonelli
Journal:  Polymers (Basel)       Date:  2021-04-30       Impact factor: 4.329

10.  Repair of articular osteochondral defects of the knee joint using a composite lamellar scaffold.

Authors:  Y M Lv; Q S Yu
Journal:  Bone Joint Res       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 5.853

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.