Literature DB >> 22120029

Estimating the minimal clinically important difference of an upper extremity recovery measure in subacute stroke patients.

Kamal Narayan Arya1, Rajesh Verma, R K Garg.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The minimal clinically important difference (MCID) estimates of some of the stroke-related measures are available; but MCID of the Fugl-Meyer assessment (FMA) measure is unknown, which limits the application and interpretation of change scores in poststroke patients with motor deficits.
OBJECTIVE: To estimate the MCID of the FMA-UE (upper extremity) using the modified Rankin scale (mRS) and global rating of patient-perceived changes (GRPPC) in subacute poststroke patients.
METHODS: The prospective, cohort study took place in the neurology department of a university hospital. Seventy-one subacute poststroke (mean duration, 8.42 weeks) patients were prospectively enrolled in a randomized clinical trial of the ongoing Meaningful Task Specific Training (MTST). FMA-UE, mRS, and GRPPC scores were obtained at pre- and 4 weeks postintervention.
RESULTS: The MCID values of FMA-UE were 9 (80.39% sensitive and 70% specific) and 10 (97.62% sensitive and 89.66% specific) anchored to mRS and GRPPC, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: The estimated MCID score for the upper extremity motor recovery among patients with subacute stroke is 9 to 10 on the FMA-UE. Patients with subacute stroke who achieve a score of 9 to 10 on FMA-UE are more likely to experience or perceive a meaningful and clinically important improvement in their disability level than those who do not. The reference value can be used to develop goals and interpret progress in subacute poststroke patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22120029     DOI: 10.1310/tsr18s01-599

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Top Stroke Rehabil        ISSN: 1074-9357            Impact factor:   2.119


  53 in total

1.  The Effect of Peripheral Nerve Stimulation on Shoulder Biomechanics: A Randomized Controlled Trial in Comparison to Physical Therapy.

Authors:  Richard D Wilson; Jayme S Knutson; Maria E Bennett; John Chae
Journal:  Am J Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 2.159

2.  Combining Fluoxetine and rTMS in Poststroke Motor Recovery: A Placebo-Controlled Double-Blind Randomized Phase 2 Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Camila Bonin Pinto; Leon Morales-Quezada; Polyana Vulcano de Toledo Piza; Dian Zeng; Faddi Ghassan Saleh Vélez; Isadora Santos Ferreira; Pedro Henrique Lucena; Dante Duarte; Fernanda Lopes; Mirret M El-Hagrassy; Luiz Vicente Rizzo; Erica C Camargo; David J Lin; Nicole Mazwi; Qing Mei Wang; Randie Black-Schaffer; Felipe Fregni
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2019-07-09       Impact factor: 3.919

3.  A feasibility study to determine the benefits of upper extremity virtual rehabilitation therapy for coping with chronic pain post-cancer surgery.

Authors:  Gregory House; Grigore Burdea; Namrata Grampurohit; Kevin Polistico; Doru Roll; Frank Damiani; Jasdeep Hundal; Didier Demesmin
Journal:  Br J Pain       Date:  2016-08-24

4.  Rehabilitation using virtual gaming for Hospital and hOMe-Based training for the Upper limb post Stroke (RHOMBUS II): protocol of a feasibility randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Cherry Kilbride; Alyson Warland; Victoria Stewart; Basaam Aweid; Arul Samiyappan; Jennifer Ryan; Tom Butcher; Dimitrios A Athanasiou; Karen Baker; Guillem Singla-Buxarrais; Nana Anokye; Carole Pound; Francesca Gowing; Meriel Norris
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-06-07       Impact factor: 3.006

5.  The minimal clinically important difference of the motricity index score.

Authors:  Chen Lin; Yurany A Arevalo; Richard L Harvey; Shyam Prabhakaran; Kimberly D Martin
Journal:  Top Stroke Rehabil       Date:  2022-01-30       Impact factor: 2.177

6.  Motor skill changes and neurophysiologic adaptation to recovery-oriented virtual rehabilitation of hand function in a person with subacute stroke: a case study.

Authors:  Gerard G Fluet; Jigna Patel; Qinyin Qiu; Matthew Yarossi; Supriya Massood; Sergei V Adamovich; Eugene Tunik; Alma S Merians
Journal:  Disabil Rehabil       Date:  2016-09-27       Impact factor: 3.033

7.  Implanted neuroprosthesis for assisting arm and hand function after stroke: a case study.

Authors:  Jayme S Knutson; John Chae; Ronald L Hart; Michael W Keith; Harry A Hoyen; Mary Y Harley; Terri Z Hisel; Anne M Bryden; Kevin L Kilgore; Hunter Peckham
Journal:  J Rehabil Res Dev       Date:  2012

Review 8.  Evaluation of Performance-Based Outcome Measures for the Upper Limb: A Comprehensive Narrative Review.

Authors:  Sophie Wang; C Janice Hsu; Lauren Trent; Tiffany Ryan; Nathan T Kearns; Eugene F Civillico; Kimberly L Kontson
Journal:  PM R       Date:  2018-02-21       Impact factor: 2.298

9.  Effects of Robotic Neurorehabilitation on Body Representation in Individuals with Stroke: A Preliminary Study Focusing on an EEG-Based Approach.

Authors:  Maria Grazia Maggio; Antonino Naro; Alfredo Manuli; Giuseppa Maresca; Tina Balletta; Desirèe Latella; Rosaria De Luca; Rocco Salvatore Calabrò
Journal:  Brain Topogr       Date:  2021-03-04       Impact factor: 3.020

10.  Augmented efficacy of intermittent theta burst stimulation on the virtual reality-based cycling training for upper limb function in patients with stroke: a double-blinded, randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Yu-Hsin Chen; Chia-Ling Chen; Ying-Zu Huang; Hsieh-Ching Chen; Chung-Yao Chen; Ching-Yi Wu; Keh-Chung Lin
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2021-05-31       Impact factor: 4.262

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.