Literature DB >> 33661430

Effects of Robotic Neurorehabilitation on Body Representation in Individuals with Stroke: A Preliminary Study Focusing on an EEG-Based Approach.

Maria Grazia Maggio1, Antonino Naro1, Alfredo Manuli1, Giuseppa Maresca1, Tina Balletta1, Desirèe Latella1, Rosaria De Luca1, Rocco Salvatore Calabrò2.   

Abstract

Patients with stroke can experience a drastic change in their body representation (BR), beyond the physical and psychological consequences of stroke itself. Noteworthy, the misperception of BR could affect patients' motor performance even more. Our study aimed at evaluating the usefulness of a robot-aided gait training (RAGT) equipped with augmented visuomotor feedback, expected to target BR (RAGT + VR) in improving lower limb sensorimotor function, gait performance (using Fugl-Meyer Assessment scale for lower extremities, FMA-LE), and BR (using the Body Esteem Scale-BES- and the Body Uneasiness Test-BUT), as compared to RAGT - VR. We also assessed the neurophysiologic basis putatively subtending the BR-based motor function recovery, using EEG recording during RAGT. Forty-five patients with stroke were enrolled in this study and randomized with a 1:2 ratio into either the RAGT + VR (n = 30) or the RAGT - VR (n = 15) group. The former group carried out rehabilitation training with the Lokomat©Pro; whereas, the latter used the Lokomat©Nanos. The rehabilitation protocol consisted of 40 one-hour training sessions. At the end of the training, the RAGT + VR improved in FMA-LE (p < 0.001) and BR (as per BES, (p < 0.001), and BUT, (p < 0.001)) more than the RAGT- did (p < 0.001). These differences in clinical outcomes were paralleled by a greater strengthening of visuomotor connectivity and corticomotor excitability (as detected at the EEG analyses) in the RAGT + VR than in the RAGT - VR (all comparisons p < 0.001), corresponding to an improved motor programming and execution in the former group.We may argue that BR recovery was important concerning functional motor improvement by its integration with the motor control system. This likely occurred through the activation of the Mirror Neuron System secondary to the visuomotor feedback provision, resembling virtual reality. Last, our data further confirm the important role of visuomotor feedback in post-stroke rehabilitation, which can achieve better patient-tailored improvement in functional gait by means of RAGT + VR targeting BR.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Augmented visuomotor feedback; Body representation (BR); Gait rehabilitation; Mirror neuron system (MNS); Robot-aided gait training (RAGT)

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33661430     DOI: 10.1007/s10548-021-00825-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Topogr        ISSN: 0896-0267            Impact factor:   3.020


  92 in total

1.  Action observation activates premotor and parietal areas in a somatotopic manner: an fMRI study.

Authors:  G Buccino; F Binkofski; G R Fink; L Fadiga; L Fogassi; V Gallese; R J Seitz; K Zilles; G Rizzolatti; H J Freund
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 3.386

2.  Conflict monitoring and anterior cingulate cortex: an update.

Authors:  Matthew M Botvinick; Jonathan D Cohen; Cameron S Carter
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 20.229

3.  Attentional modulation of the somatosensory mu rhythm.

Authors:  K L Anderson; M Ding
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2011-02-22       Impact factor: 3.590

4.  Robotic neurorehabilitation in patients with chronic stroke: psychological well-being beyond motor improvement.

Authors:  Rocco S Calabrò; Maria C De Cola; Antonino Leo; Simone Reitano; Tina Balletta; Giovanni Trombetta; Antonino Naro; Margherita Russo; Francesco Bertè; Rosaria De Luca; Placido Bramanti
Journal:  Int J Rehabil Res       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 1.479

5.  Can robot-assisted movement training (Lokomat) improve functional recovery and psychological well-being in chronic stroke? Promising findings from a case study.

Authors:  Rocco Salvatore Calabrò; Simone Reitano; Antonio Leo; Rosaria De Luca; Corrado Melegari; Placido Bramanti
Journal:  Funct Neurol       Date:  2014 Apr-Jun

6.  Estimating the minimal clinically important difference of an upper extremity recovery measure in subacute stroke patients.

Authors:  Kamal Narayan Arya; Rajesh Verma; R K Garg
Journal:  Top Stroke Rehabil       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 2.119

Review 7.  Immersive virtual reality in traumatic brain injury rehabilitation: A literature review.

Authors:  Jared Aida; Brian Chau; Justin Dunn
Journal:  NeuroRehabilitation       Date:  2018       Impact factor: 2.138

8.  Specialised structural descriptions for human body parts: Evidence from autotopagnosia.

Authors:  L J Buxbaum; H B Coslett
Journal:  Cogn Neuropsychol       Date:  2001-06-01       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Computerized visual feedback: an adjunct to robotic-assisted gait training.

Authors:  Raphael Banz; Marc Bolliger; Gery Colombo; Volker Dietz; Lars Lünenburger
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2008-09-04

10.  The role of virtual reality in improving motor performance as revealed by EEG: a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Rocco Salvatore Calabrò; Antonino Naro; Margherita Russo; Antonino Leo; Rosaria De Luca; Tina Balletta; Antonio Buda; Gianluca La Rosa; Alessia Bramanti; Placido Bramanti
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2017-06-07       Impact factor: 4.262

View more
  1 in total

1.  Body Representation in Patients with Severe Spinal Cord Injury: A Pilot Study on the Promising Role of Powered Exoskeleton for Gait Training.

Authors:  Maria Grazia Maggio; Antonino Naro; Rosaria De Luca; Desiree Latella; Tina Balletta; Lory Caccamo; Giovanni Pioggia; Daniele Bruschetta; Rocco Salvatore Calabrò
Journal:  J Pers Med       Date:  2022-04-11
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.