Literature DB >> 20053073

Image statistics do not explain the perception of gloss and lightness.

Barton L Anderson1, Juno Kim.   

Abstract

A fundamental problem in image analysis is to understand the nature of the computations and mechanisms that provide information about the material properties of surfaces. Information about a surface's 3D shape, optics, illumination field, and atmospheric conditions are conflated in the image, which must somehow be disentangled to derive the properties of surfaces. It was recently suggested that the visual system exploits some simple image statistics-histogram or sub-band skew-to infer the lightness and gloss of surfaces (I. Motoyoshi, S. Nishida, L. Sharan, & E. H. Adelson, 2007). Here, we show that the correlations Motoyoshi et al. (2007) observed between skew, lightness, and gloss only arose because of the limited space of surface geometries, reflectance properties, and illumination fields they evaluated. We argue that the lightness effects they reported were a statistical artifact of equating the means of images with skewed histograms, and that the perception of gloss requires an analysis of the consistency between the estimate of a surface's 3D shape and the positions and orientations of highlights on a surface. We argue that the derivation of surface and material properties requires a photo-geometric analysis, and that purely photometric statistics such as skew fail to capture any diagnostic information about surfaces because they are devoid of the structural information needed to distinguish different types of surface attributes.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 20053073     DOI: 10.1167/9.11.10

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis        ISSN: 1534-7362            Impact factor:   2.240


  49 in total

1.  What makes a feather shine? A nanostructural basis for glossy black colours in feathers.

Authors:  Rafael Maia; Liliana D'Alba; Matthew D Shawkey
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-12-01       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 2.  Color and material perception: achievements and challenges.

Authors:  Laurence T Maloney; David H Brainard
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2010-12-27       Impact factor: 2.240

3.  Naturally glossy: Gloss perception, illumination statistics, and tone mapping.

Authors:  Wendy J Adams; Gizem Kucukoglu; Michael S Landy; Rafal K Mantiuk
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2018-12-03       Impact factor: 2.240

4.  Frequency-based heuristics for material perception.

Authors:  Martin Giesel; Qasim Zaidi
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2013-12-06       Impact factor: 2.240

5.  The dark side of gloss.

Authors:  Juno Kim; Phillip J Marlow; Barton L Anderson
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2012-09-23       Impact factor: 24.884

6.  Perceptual gloss parameters are encoded by population responses in the monkey inferior temporal cortex.

Authors:  Akiko Nishio; Takeaki Shimokawa; Naokazu Goda; Hidehiko Komatsu
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-08-13       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Visual motion and the perception of surface material.

Authors:  Katja Doerschner; Roland W Fleming; Ozgur Yilmaz; Paul R Schrater; Bruce Hartung; Daniel Kersten
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2011-11-23       Impact factor: 10.834

Review 8.  Visual inferences of material changes: color as clue and distraction.

Authors:  Qasim Zaidi
Journal:  Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci       Date:  2011-05-04

9.  Perceived glossiness and lightness under real-world illumination.

Authors:  Maria Olkkonen; David H Brainard
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2010-09-01       Impact factor: 2.240

10.  Optimal sampling of visual information for lightness judgments.

Authors:  Matteo Toscani; Matteo Valsecchi; Karl R Gegenfurtner
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-06-17       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.