| Literature DB >> 22118263 |
Yan Cui1, Bidur Bhandary, Anu Marahatta, Geum-Hwa Lee, Bo Li, Do-Sung Kim, Soo-Wan Chae, Hyung-Ryong Kim, Han-Jung Chae.
Abstract
<span class="abstract_title">BACKGROUND: <span class="Species">Salvia miltiorrhiza (SM) has long been used as a traditional oriental medicine for cardiovascular disease. Accumulating evidence also indicates that SM has anti-osteoporotic effects. This study was conducted to examine the SM-induced anti-osteoporotic effect and its possible mechanisms with various doses of SM.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2011 PMID: 22118263 PMCID: PMC3298536 DOI: 10.1186/1472-6882-11-120
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Complement Altern Med ISSN: 1472-6882 Impact factor: 3.659
Figure 1The Quantification of BMD and BMC in SM-treated rats. aBMD (A) and aBMC (B) of right distal femur ex vivo measured by DEXA, and vBMD (C) of right proximal tibia ex vivo measured μ-CT. OVX significantly decreased aBMD,by aBMC and vBMD, respectively. Although SM treatment tended to have a dose-dependent preventive effect, only treatment with 30 mg/kg body weight/day of SM significantly prevented BMD and BMC decrease induced by OVX. Note: *p < 0.001 vs Sham group; #p < 0.05 vs OVX group
Figure 2The image analysis of rat medial-proximal tibia in SM-treated rats. A, Coronal images of rat medial-proximal tibia were shown by μ-CT. B, 3D images taken by μ-CT.
Trabecular microstructural properties of the right tibial metaphysis and cortical geometric properties evaluated ex vivo using micro-CT.
| Parameters | Sham | OVX | SM1 | SM3 | SM10 | SM30 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 30.06 ± 4.57 | 3.90 ± 1.61 * | 4.56 ± 2.44 * | 4.92 ± 1.84 * | 6.22 ± 1.78 * | 8.05 ± 3.32 *, # | |
| 112.76 ± 7.95 | 96.51 ± 4.99 * | 101.03 ± 6.58 * | 100.06 ± 7.42 * | 99.53 ± 5.92 * | 107.03 ± 5.02 *, # | |
| 2.67 ± 0.40 | 0.40 ± 0.16 * | 0.45 ± 0.23 * | 0.50 ± 0.19 * | 0.63 ± 0.19 * | 0.93 ± 0.28 *, # | |
| 0.25 ± 0.08 | 1.05 ± 0.13 * | 1.05 ± 0.26 * | 1.03 ± 0.20 * | 0.93 ± 0.21 * | 0.71 ± 0.10 *, # | |
| 97.53 ± 12.90 | 8.95 ± 3.67 * | 9.24 ± 4.90 * | 10.59 ± 3.22 * | 14.24 ± 6.62 * | 19.37 ± 6.34 *, # | |
| 4.25 ± 2.29 | 20.35 ± 2.98 * | 19.50 ± 2.26 * | 18.98 ± 1.89 * | 18.48 ± 2.62 * | 15.79 ± 3.05 *, # | |
| 1.46 ± 0.25 | 2.69 ± 0.10 * | 2.64 ± 0.12 * | 2.61 ± 0.14 * | 2.59 ± 0.16 * | 2.32 ± 0.26 *, # | |
| 5.38 ± 0.22 | 5.41 ± 0.45 | 5.98 ± 0.34 | 5.67 ± 0.43 | 5.58 ± 0.34 | 5.29 ± 0.31 | |
| 29.65 ± 0.13 | 29.63 ± 0.09 | 29.65 ± 0.07 | 29.54 ± 0.10 | 29.62 ± 0.06 | 29.66 ± 0.08 |
Note: Results are presented as the means ± SD. *p < 0.001 vs. Sham group; #p < 0.05 vs. OVX group. BV/TV, bone volume fraction; Conn.D, connectivity density; SMI, structure model index; Tb.Th, trabecular thickness; Tb.N, trabecular number; Tb.Sp, trabecular separation; Tb.Pf, Trabecular bone pattern factor; Ct.Ar, cortical area; Ct.Th, cortical thickness. Rat groups include sham-operated (Sham), OVX-control (OVX), and 1, 3, 10 and 30 mg/kg SM treated (1SM, 3SM, 10SM AND 30SM) ovariectomized groups for a total of 6 groups (N = 7~10/each group).
Histomorphometric parameters of trabecular bone from metaphysis of tibiae evaluated by histochemical analysis.
| Parameters | Sham | OVX | 1SM | 3SM | 10SM | 30SM |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 55.44 ± 7.10 | 10.24 ± 3.68 * | 11.51 ± 2.27 | 11.61 ± 2.27 | 15.19 ± 1.61 | 18.70 ± 1.38 # | |
| 35.14 ± 5.17 | 14.86 ± 5.54 * | 15.72 ± 3.33 | 16.37 ± 3.03 | 21.32 ± 3.71 | 26.37 ± 2.49 # | |
| 15.87 ± 1.59 | 5.73 ± 2.03 * | 6.06 ± 1.99 | 6.39 ± 2.00 | 8.88 ± 2.61 | 12.35 ± 2.67 # | |
| 28.38 ± 5.80 | 199.70 ± 3.48 * | 180.27 ± 3.46 | 176.26 ± 2.18 | 98.75 ± 7.21 | 81.67 ± 6.38 # | |
| 5 ± 1.41 | 17 ± 2.40 * | 16 ± 2.39 | 17 ± 2.20 | 13 ± 2.26 | 10 ± 1.41 # |
Note: Results are presented as the means ± SD. *p < 0.001 vs. Sham group; #p < 0.05 vs. OVX group. BV/TV, bone volume fraction; Tb.Th, trabecular thickness; Tb.N, trabecular number; Tb.Sp, trabecular separation; Oc.N, osteoclast number. Rat groups as defined above (N = 7/each group).
Figure 3Bone histochemical section images of proximal metaphysis of tibia. A, Sham group: trabecular bone (T) and bone marrow spaces (M). B, OVX group: significantly increased bone marrow space, decreased trabecular network. C, 30 mg/kg of SM treatment significantly attenuated trabecular network loss compared with Sham rats. (H & E, ×100).
Figure 4Liver histochemical section images. Plates of liver parenchymal cells and sinusoids among the laminae of hepatic cells radiating from the central vein (→) and radiating towards the portal area (→). Upper (H & E, ×100) and Lower (H & E, ×200).
The number of infiltrated mononuclear cells in the portal area of liver/10 HPF (×200).
| Parameters | Sham | OVX | 1SM | 3SM | 10SM | 30SM |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1.57 ± 1.27 | 12.00 ± 2.40 * | 12.00 ± 2.39 | 11.50 ± 2.20 | 10.38 ± 2.26 | 8.50 ± 2.34 # |
Note: Results are presented as the means ± SD. *p < 0.001 vs. Sham group; #p < 0.05 vs. OVX group. Rat groups as defined above (N = 7/each group).
Figure 5Serum bone turnover marker levels. Serum BALP activity (A), seru m TRAP-5b activity (B), Serum MDA levels (C) and serum nitrate levels (D) were measured as described in Materials and Methods. Note: (A) to (B) *p < 0.05 vs Sham rats; #p < 0.05 vs OVX rats. (C) *p < 0.001 vs Sham group; #p < 0.001 vs OVX group. (D) *p < 0.001 vs Sham rats; #p < 0.001 vs OVX rats; &p < 0.01 vs OVX rats.
Serum biochemical parameters.
| Parameters | Sham | OVX | SM1 | SM3 | SM10 | SM30 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 32.57 ± 8.28 | 51.29 ± 7.78 & | 47.71 ± 5.38 | 51.57 ± 3.74 | 51.14 ± 8.80 | 47.57 ± 7.00 | |
| 16.09 ± 3.38 | 9.29 ± 2.51 # | 10.27 ± 3.18 | 8.10 ± 3.03 | 9.07 ± 2.60 | 10.10 ± 3.23 | |
| 3.84 ± 0.50 | 3.83 ± 0.31 | 3.97 ± 0.31 | 3.91 ± 0.23 | 3.79 ± 0.41 | 3.74 ± 0.23 | |
| 1.90 ± 0.47 | 3.04 ± 0.25 * | 3.07 ± 0.30 | 2.89 ± 0.31 | 2.73 ± 0.23 | 2.00 ± 0.51 % | |
| 2.40 ± 0.28 | 3.66 ± 0.48 * | 3.40 ± 0.57 | 3.63 ± 0.44 | 3.44 ± 0.43 | 3.47 ± 0.42 | |
| 9.30 ± 0.41 | 9.46 ± 0.29 | 9.63 ± 0.21 | 9.78 ± 0.46 | 9.40 ± 0.27 | 9.70 ± 0.51 | |
| 6.21 ± 0.80 | 6.24 ± 0.65 | 6.60 ± 0.57 | 6.50 ± 0.72 | 6.17 ± 0.53 | 6.49 ± 0.79 |
Note: T3, triiodothyronine; T4, thyroxine, IP, inorganic phosphorus. Results are presented as the means ± SD. *p < 0.001 vs. Sham group; #p< 0.01 vs. Sham group; &p < 0.05 vs. Sham group; %p < 0.001 vs. OVX group. Rat groups as defined above (N = 6/each group).