| Literature DB >> 29198835 |
Nia Kania1, Wahyu Widowati2, Firli Rahmah Primula Dewi3, Antonius Christianto3, Bambang Setiawan4, Nicolaas Budhiparama5, Zairin Noor6.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Bone fragility and an increase in susceptibility to fracture osteoporosis is characterized by a reduction in bone mass and the micro-architectural deterioration of bone tissue. There is no previous study regarding the effect of Cinnamomum burmanini Blume on osteoporosis.Entities:
Keywords: Bone mesostructure; Bone turnover; Cinnamon; Osteoporosis
Year: 2017 PMID: 29198835 PMCID: PMC5884038 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaim.2017.01.005
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Ayurveda Integr Med ISSN: 0975-9476
Fig. 1High-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) profile of C. burmanini Blume and identification of active compounds using several kinds of standards. A) HPLC results from EECB showed several peaks; B) Identification of active compounds using coumarin acid as standard; C) Identification of active compounds using eugenol as standard; D) Identification of active compounds using trans-cinnamic acid as standard.
Quantification of HPLC result from sample (EECB) and standard (coumarin, eugenol, and trans-cinnamic acid).
| Standard/Sample | RT | Peak | Sample (mg/5 ml) | Sample (μg/ml) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Eugenol | 1.78 | 6,997,404 | 1.7 | 340 |
| 0.98 | 14,783,984 | 0.5 | 100 | |
| Coumarin | 1.53 | 3,156,667 | 0.6 | 120 |
| EECB | 1.07 | 1,931,865 | 4.1 | 820 |
| 1.67 | 1,232,999 | 4.1 | 820 | |
| 0.77 | 745,840 | 4.1 | 820 | |
| 1.54 | 689,570 | 4.1 | 820 |
Concentration from three active compounds that identified in EECB.
| Standard | Content (μg/ml) | Content (%) |
|---|---|---|
| Eugenol (RT 1.78) | 59.91 | 7.3 |
| 13.07 | 1.6 | |
| Coumarin (RT 1.53) | 26.21 | 3.2 |
Level of bone turn over markers in supplementation and control group (ng/ml).
| Sham | OVX | OVX + Cinnamon (mg/kg BW) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 12.5 | 25 | 50 | |||
| CTX | 1.32 ± 0.23 | 1.03 ± 0.06 | 1.20 ± 0.03 | 1.22 ± 0.04 | 1.38 ± 0.10 |
| Osteocalcin | 2.14 ± 0.35 | 1.69 ± 0.14 | 2.32 ± 0.41 | 2.15 ± 0.21 | 2.73 ± 0.63 |
Values are presented as mean ± SD.
p < 0.05 in comparison with sham group.
p < 0.05 in comparison with ovariectomized group.
The number of bone cells in supplementation and control group (cells).
| Sham | OVX | OVX + Cinnamon (mg/kg BW) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 12.5 | 25 | 50 | |||
| Osteoblast | 7.00 ± 7.00 | 40.00 ± 10.53 | 44.00 ± 11.53 | 48.33 ± 17.92 | 24.33 ± 4.04 |
| Osteoclast | 12.66 ± 7.23 | 34.66 ± 5.68 | 56.00 ± 18.73 | 40.00 ± 12.16 | 26.66 ± 9.86 |
| Osteocyte | 50.33 ± 13.86 | 78.00 ± 11.79 | 109.00 ± 39.39 | 75.66 ± 30.03 | 98.00 ± 23.89 |
| Ob/Oc ratio | 0.47 ± 0.24 | 1.14 ± 0.12 | 0.89 ± 0.54 | 1.32 ± 0.74 | 1.01 ± 0.43 |
Values are presented as mean ± SD.
p < 0.05 in comparison with sham group.
p < 0.05 in comparison with ovariectomy (OVX) group.
p < 0.05; in comparison with ovariectomy + 12.5 mg/kg BW of Cinnamon group.
p < 0.05; in comparison with ovariectomy + 25 mg/kg BW of Cinnamon group; Ob: osteoblast; Oc; osteoclast.
Level of tibia mineral elements in supplementation and control group (%).
| Level (%) | Sham | OVX | OVX + Cinnamon (mg/kg BW) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 12.5 | 25 | 50 | |||
| Calcium | 87.33 ± 2.36 | 78.66 ± 14.70 | 84.51 ± 1.55 | 85.18 ± 0.88 | 85.88 ± 1.42 |
| Phosphorus | 6.21 ± 1.40 | 10.75 ± 5.25 | 11.12 ± 1.41 | 8.70 ± 3.59 | 9.60 ± 0.88 |
| Iron | 1.02 ± 0.06 | 0.73 ± 0.52 | 0.62 ± 0.10 | 0.88 ± 0.53 | 0.90 ± 0.20 |
| Copper | 0.33 ± 0.08 | 0.12 ± 0.07 | 0.09 ± 0.02 | 0.17 ± 0.13 | 0.23 ± 0.15 |
| Zinc | 0.78 ± 0.10 | 0.94 ± 0.39 | 0.67 ± 0.09 | 0.92 ± 0.23 | 0.70 ± 0.08 |
| Nickel | 0.21 ± 0.10 | 0.73 ± 0.83 | 0.10 ± 0.01 | 0.13 ± 0.07 | 0.30 ± 0.19 |
| Ca/P | 14.55 ± 3.35 | 12.03 ± 2.96 | 7.69 ± 1.12 | 11.51 ± 6.27 | 8.99 ± 0.79 |
| Cu/Zn | 0.43 ± 0.12 | 0.18 ± 0.01a | 0.13 ± 0.02a | 0.17 ± 0.08 | 0.32 ± 0.17 |
Values are presented as mean ± SD; Ca/P: calcium/phosphorus; Cu/Zn: copper/zinc; OVX: ovariectomy.
Fig. 2Mesostructure of sham-operated rats (A) and ovariectomized rats (B). Mesostructure of sham-operated rats presented rod-like trabecules with honeycomb appearance and minimal holes (A). Mesostructure of tibia bone in ovariectomized was rats significantly different as compared to sham-operated rats. Trabecular breaking and stump structure, which contributed to massive hole, and the losing of granule structure was observed in ovariectomized rats (B). The trabecular surface of ovariectomized rats supplemented with EECB12.5 or EECB50 was not different compared with ovariectomized rats (C, D), and the granule structure was seen in the third dose group (E) (Scanning Electron Microscope, Magnification ×2000).
Fig. 3Ramachandran plot analysis and 3-D protein modeling of RANK, RANKL, and OPG.
Binding energy required for the interaction process.
| Coumarin | Eugenol | TCA | |
|---|---|---|---|
| RANKL | −750.88 kJ/mol | −768.91 kJ/mol | −834.33 kJ/mol |
| RANK–RANKL complex | −850.05 kJ/mol | −773.87 kJ/mol | −746.86 kJ/mol |
| OPG | −721.53 kJ/mol | −696.04 kJ/mol | −653.57 kJ/mol |
| RANKL–OPG complex | −649.09 kJ/mol | −687.59 kJ/mol | −642.78 kJ/mol |