Literature DB >> 22115511

Stakeholder engagement and knowledge exchange in environmental research.

Jeremy Phillipson1, Philip Lowe, Amy Proctor, Eric Ruto.   

Abstract

It is commonly put forward that effective uptake of research in policy or practice must be built upon a foundation of active knowledge exchange and stakeholder engagement during the research. However, what is often lacking is a systematic appreciation of the specific practices of knowledge exchange and their relative merits. The paper reports on a 2009 survey of 21 research projects within the UK Research Councils' Rural Economy and Land Use Programme regarding the involvement and perceived impact of over a thousand stakeholders in the research. The survey reveals that most stakeholders were involved as research subjects or as event participants. Large numbers were also engaged in the research process itself, including involvement in shaping the direction of research. Stakeholder engagement is perceived as bringing significant benefits to the process of knowledge production. A close relationship is found between mechanisms and approaches to knowledge exchange and the spread of benefits for researchers and stakeholders. Mutual benefits are gained from exchange of staff or where stakeholders are members of research advisory groups. Different stakeholder sectors are also associated with different patterns of engagement, which lead to contrasting impact patterns. Any efforts to alter knowledge exchange processes and outcomes must overcome these differing engagement tendencies. Overall, much greater attention should be given to early processes of knowledge exchange and stakeholder engagement within the lifetime of research projects.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22115511     DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2011.10.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Environ Manage        ISSN: 0301-4797            Impact factor:   6.789


  15 in total

1.  Building Common Ground for Environmental Flows using Traditional Techniques and Novel Engagement Approaches.

Authors:  Kelly E Mott Lacroix; Brittany C Xiu; Sharon B Megdal
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2016-01-14       Impact factor: 3.266

Review 2.  The art of co-production of knowledge in environmental sciences and management: lessons from international practice.

Authors:  Ida Nadia S Djenontin; Alison M Meadow
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2018-04-05       Impact factor: 3.266

3.  Knowledge that Acts: Evaluating the Outcomes of a Knowledge Brokering Intervention in Western Australia's Ningaloo Region.

Authors:  Kelly Chapman; Fabio Boschetti; Elizabeth Fulton; Pierre Horwitz; Tod Jones; Pascal Scherrer; Geoff Syme
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2017-08-19       Impact factor: 3.266

4.  Enhanced science-stakeholder communication to improve ecosystem model performances for climate change impact assessments.

Authors:  Anna Maria Jönsson; Olle Anderbrant; Jennie Holmér; Jacob Johansson; Guy Schurgers; Glenn P Svensson; Henrik G Smith
Journal:  Ambio       Date:  2014-09-20       Impact factor: 5.129

5.  Toward a Predictive Understanding of Earth's Microbiomes to Address 21st Century Challenges.

Authors:  Martin J Blaser; Zoe G Cardon; Mildred K Cho; Jeffrey L Dangl; Timothy J Donohue; Jessica L Green; Rob Knight; Mary E Maxon; Trent R Northen; Katherine S Pollard; Eoin L Brodie
Journal:  mBio       Date:  2016-05-13       Impact factor: 7.867

Review 6.  The CROPROTECT project and wider opportunities to improve farm productivity through web-based knowledge exchange.

Authors:  Toby J A Bruce
Journal:  Food Energy Secur       Date:  2016-03-06       Impact factor: 4.109

7.  Systematic Review of Quantitative Measures of Stakeholder Engagement.

Authors:  D J Bowen; T Hyams; M Goodman; K M West; J Harris-Wai; J-H Yu
Journal:  Clin Transl Sci       Date:  2017-05-29       Impact factor: 4.689

Review 8.  The role of fire in UK peatland and moorland management: the need for informed, unbiased debate.

Authors:  G Matt Davies; Nicholas Kettridge; Cathelijne R Stoof; Alan Gray; Davide Ascoli; Paulo M Fernandes; Rob Marrs; Katherine A Allen; Stefan H Doerr; Gareth D Clay; Julia McMorrow; Vigdis Vandvik
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2016-06-05       Impact factor: 6.237

9.  Digital innovation through partnership between nature conservation organisations and academia: a qualitative impact assessment.

Authors:  Carlos Galán-Díaz; Peter Edwards; John D Nelson; René van der Wal
Journal:  Ambio       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 5.129

10.  How to engage stakeholders in research: design principles to support improvement.

Authors:  Annette Boaz; Stephen Hanney; Robert Borst; Alison O'Shea; Maarten Kok
Journal:  Health Res Policy Syst       Date:  2018-07-11
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.