Literature DB >> 26768733

Building Common Ground for Environmental Flows using Traditional Techniques and Novel Engagement Approaches.

Kelly E Mott Lacroix1, Brittany C Xiu2, Sharon B Megdal2.   

Abstract

Despite increased understanding of the science of environmental flows, identification and implementation of effective environmental flow policies remains elusive. Perhaps the greatest barrier to implementing flow policies is the framework for water management. An alternative management approach is needed when legal rights for environmental flows do not exist, or are ineffective at protecting ecosystems. The research presented here, conducted in the U.S. state of Arizona, provides an empirical example of engagement to promote social learning as an approach to finding ways to provide water for the environment where legal rights for environmental flows are inadequate. Based on our engagement process we propose that identifying and then building common ground require attention to the process of analyzing qualitative data and the methods for displaying complex information, two aspects not frequently discussed in the social learning or stakeholder engagement literature. The results and methods from this study can help communities develop an engagement process that will find and build common ground, increase stakeholder involvement, and identify innovative solutions to provide water for the environment that reflect the concerns of current water users.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Common ground; Environmental flow needs; Natural areas; Stakeholder engagement; Water management

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26768733     DOI: 10.1007/s00267-016-0656-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Manage        ISSN: 0364-152X            Impact factor:   3.266


  6 in total

1.  Stakeholder engagement and knowledge exchange in environmental research.

Authors:  Jeremy Phillipson; Philip Lowe; Amy Proctor; Eric Ruto
Journal:  J Environ Manage       Date:  2011-11-04       Impact factor: 6.789

2.  The challenge of providing environmental flow rules to sustain river ecosystems.

Authors:  Angela H Arthington; Stuart E Bunn; N LeRoy Poff; Robert J Naiman
Journal:  Ecol Appl       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 4.657

3.  Evolution of co-management: role of knowledge generation, bridging organizations and social learning.

Authors:  Fikret Berkes
Journal:  J Environ Manage       Date:  2008-12-24       Impact factor: 6.789

4.  Global threats to human water security and river biodiversity.

Authors:  C J Vörösmarty; P B McIntyre; M O Gessner; D Dudgeon; A Prusevich; P Green; S Glidden; S E Bunn; C A Sullivan; C Reidy Liermann; P M Davies
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2010-09-30       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Linking knowledge with action in the pursuit of sustainable water-resources management.

Authors:  Katharine Jacobs; Louis Lebel; James Buizer; Lee Addams; Pamela Matson; Ellen McCullough; Po Garden; George Saliba; Timothy Finan
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-01-11       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Public support for river restoration. A mixed-method study into local residents' support for and framing of river management and ecological restoration in the Dutch floodplains.

Authors:  Arjen E Buijs
Journal:  J Environ Manage       Date:  2009-03-19       Impact factor: 6.789

  6 in total
  2 in total

1.  Using Strategic Adaptive Management to Facilitate Implementation of Environmental Flow Programs in Complex Social-Ecological Systems.

Authors:  John Conallin; Josh Campbell; Lee Baumgartner
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2018-08-25       Impact factor: 3.266

2.  Implementation of Environmental Flows for Intermittent River Systems: Adaptive Management and Stakeholder Participation Facilitate Implementation.

Authors:  John Conallin; Emma Wilson; Josh Campbell
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2017-09-02       Impact factor: 3.266

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.