Literature DB >> 22114178

The Lichfield bone study: the skeletal response to exercise in healthy young men.

Kyriacos I Eleftheriou1, Jaikirty S Rawal, Anthony Kehoe, Laurence E James, John R Payne, James R Skipworth, Zudin A Puthucheary, Fotios Drenos, Dudley J Pennell, Mike Loosemore, Michael World, Steve E Humphries, Fares S Haddad, Hugh E Montgomery.   

Abstract

The skeletal response to short-term exercise training remains poorly described. We thus studied the lower limb skeletal response of 723 Caucasian male army recruits to a 12-wk training regime. Femoral bone volume was assessed using magnetic resonance imaging, bone ultrastructure by quantitative ultrasound (QUS), and bone mineral density (BMD) using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) of the hip. Left hip BMD increased with training (mean ± SD: 0.85 ± 3.24, 2.93 ± 4.85, and 1.89 ± 2.85% for femoral neck, Ward's area, and total hip, respectively; all P < 0.001). Left calcaneal broadband ultrasound attenuation rose 3.57 ± 0.5% (P < 0.001), and left and right femoral cortical volume by 1.09 ± 4.05 and 0.71 ± 4.05%, respectively (P = 0.0001 and 0.003), largely through the rise in periosteal volume (0.78 ± 3.14 and 0.59 ± 2.58% for right and left, respectively, P < 0.001) with endosteal volumes unchanged. Before training, DXA and QUS measures were independent of limb dominance. However, the dominant femur had higher periosteal (25,991.49 vs. 2,5572 mm(3), P < 0.001), endosteal (6,063.33 vs. 5,983.12 mm(3), P = 0.001), and cortical volumes (19,928 vs. 19,589.56 mm(3), P = 0.001). Changes in DXA, QUS, and magnetic resonance imaging measures were independent of limb dominance. We show, for the first time, that short-term exercise training in young men is associated not only with a rise in human femoral BMD, but also in femoral bone volume, the latter largely through a periosteal response.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22114178      PMCID: PMC3289434          DOI: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00788.2011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)        ISSN: 0161-7567


  118 in total

1.  Tomographical description of tennis-loaded radius: reciprocal relation between bone size and volumetric BMD.

Authors:  N Ashizawa; K Nonaka; S Michikami; T Mizuki; H Amagai; K Tokuyama; M Suzuki
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  1999-04

Review 2.  Bone strength: what are we trying to measure?

Authors:  J D Currey
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  2001-04-11       Impact factor: 4.333

3.  Influence of physical activity and cessation of training on calcaneal quantitative ultrasound measurements in peripubertal girls: a 1-year prospective study.

Authors:  M Lehtonen-Veromaa; T Möttönen; H Kautiainen; O J Heinonen; J Viikari
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 4.333

4.  Quantitative ultrasound variables of the heel in Finnish men aged 18-20 yr: predictors, relationship to bone mineral content, and changes during military service.

Authors:  V-V Välimäki; E Löyttyniemi; M J Välimäki
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2006-08-31       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  Prediction of human femoral bone strength using ultrasound velocity and BMD: an in vitro study.

Authors:  C F Njeh; C W Kuo; C M Langton; H I Atrah; C M Boivin
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 6.  Basic biomechanical measurements of bone: a tutorial.

Authors:  C H Turner; D B Burr
Journal:  Bone       Date:  1993 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.398

7.  Association of amount of physical activity with cortical bone size and trabecular volumetric BMD in young adult men: the GOOD study.

Authors:  Mattias Lorentzon; Dan Mellström; Claes Ohlsson
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2005-07-18       Impact factor: 6.741

8.  Body mass index, calcium intake, and physical activity affect calcaneal ultrasound in healthy Greek males in an age-dependent and parameter-specific manner.

Authors:  Eirini Babaroutsi; Faidon Magkos; Yannis Manios; Labros S Sidossis
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 2.626

9.  Postcranial robusticity in Homo. III: Ontogeny.

Authors:  C B Ruff; A Walker; E Trinkaus
Journal:  Am J Phys Anthropol       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 2.868

10.  Influence of exercise mode and osteogenic index on bone biomarker responses during short-term physical training.

Authors:  Mark E Lester; Maria L Urso; Rachel K Evans; Joseph R Pierce; Barry A Spiering; Carl M Maresh; Disa L Hatfield; William J Kraemer; Bradley C Nindl
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2009-06-09       Impact factor: 4.398

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  Can physical activity improve peak bone mass?

Authors:  Bonny Specker; Maggie Minett
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 5.096

2.  State of Knowledge on Molecular Adaptations to Exercise in Humans: Historical Perspectives and Future Directions.

Authors:  Kaleen M Lavin; Paul M Coen; Liliana C Baptista; Margaret B Bell; Devin Drummer; Sara A Harper; Manoel E Lixandrão; Jeremy S McAdam; Samia M O'Bryan; Sofhia Ramos; Lisa M Roberts; Rick B Vega; Bret H Goodpaster; Marcas M Bamman; Thomas W Buford
Journal:  Compr Physiol       Date:  2022-03-09       Impact factor: 8.915

3.  The relationship between lower limb bone and muscle in military recruits, response to physical training, and influence of smoking status.

Authors:  Zudin Puthucheary; Mehdi Kordi; Jai Rawal; Kyriacos I Eleftheriou; John Payne; Hugh E Montgomery
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-03-20       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 4.  Exercise, Osteoporosis, and Bone Geometry.

Authors:  Amy T Harding; Belinda R Beck
Journal:  Sports (Basel)       Date:  2017-05-12

5.  High-impact exercise stimulated localised adaptation of microarchitecture across distal tibia in postmenopausal women.

Authors:  J Du; C Hartley; K Brooke-Wavell; M A Paggiosi; J S Walsh; S Li; V V Silberschmidt
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2020-11-16       Impact factor: 4.507

6.  Physical exercise associated with improved BMD independently of sex and vitamin D levels in young adults.

Authors:  Rune Tønnesen; Peter Schwarz; Peter Hambak Hovind; Lars Thorbjørn Jensen
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2016-05-05       Impact factor: 3.078

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.