Literature DB >> 22113888

Previous fractures at multiple sites increase the risk for subsequent fractures: the Global Longitudinal Study of Osteoporosis in Women.

Stephen Gehlbach1, Kenneth G Saag, Jonathan D Adachi, Fred H Hooven, Julie Flahive, Steven Boonen, Roland D Chapurlat, Juliet E Compston, Cyrus Cooper, Adolfo Díez-Perez, Susan L Greenspan, Andrea Z LaCroix, J Coen Netelenbos, Johannes Pfeilschifter, Maurizio Rossini, Christian Roux, Philip N Sambrook, Stuart Silverman, Ethel S Siris, Nelson B Watts, Robert Lindsay.   

Abstract

Previous fractures of the hip, spine, or wrist are well-recognized predictors of future fracture, but the role of other fracture sites is less clear. We sought to assess the relationship between prior fracture at 10 skeletal locations and incident fracture. The Global Longitudinal Study of Osteoporosis in Women (GLOW) is an observational cohort study being conducted in 17 physician practices in 10 countries. Women aged ≥55 years answered questionnaires at baseline and at 1 and/or 2 years (fractures in previous year). Of 60,393 women enrolled, follow-up data were available for 51,762. Of these, 17.6%, 4.0%, and 1.6% had suffered 1, 2, or ≥3 fractures, respectively, since age 45 years. During the first 2 years of follow-up, 3149 women suffered 3683 incident fractures. Compared with women with no previous fractures, women with 1, 2, or ≥3 prior fractures were 1.8-, 3.0-, and 4.8-fold more likely to have any incident fracture; those with ≥3 prior fractures were 9.1-fold more likely to sustain a new vertebral fracture. Nine of 10 prior fracture locations were associated with an incident fracture. The strongest predictors of incident spine and hip fractures were prior spine fracture (hazard ratio [HR] = 7.3) and hip (HR = 3.5). Prior rib fractures were associated with a 2.3-fold risk of subsequent vertebral fracture, and previous upper leg fracture predicted a 2.2-fold increased risk of hip fracture. Women with a history of ankle fracture were at 1.8-fold risk of future fracture of a weight-bearing bone. Our findings suggest that a broad range of prior fracture sites are associated with an increased risk of incident fractures, with important implications for clinical assessments and risk model development.
© 2012 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22113888      PMCID: PMC4881741          DOI: 10.1002/jbmr.1476

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Miner Res        ISSN: 0884-0431            Impact factor:   6.741


  23 in total

1.  The accuracy of self-report of fractures in elderly women: evidence from a prospective study.

Authors:  M C Nevitt; S R Cummings; W S Browner; D G Seeley; J A Cauley; T M Vogt; D M Black
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1992-03-01       Impact factor: 4.897

2.  Validity of self-report of fractures: results from a prospective study in men and women across Europe. EPOS Study Group. European Prospective Osteoporosis Study Group.

Authors:  A A Ismail; T W O'Neill; W Cockerill; J D Finn; J B Cannata; K Hoszowski; O Johnell; C Matthis; H Raspe; A Raspe; J Reeve; A J Silman
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  Risk of subsequent fracture after low-trauma fracture in men and women.

Authors:  Jacqueline R Center; Dana Bliuc; Tuan V Nguyen; John A Eisman
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2007-01-24       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Rib fractures predict incident limb fractures: results from the European prospective osteoporosis study.

Authors:  A A Ismail; A J Silman; J Reeve; S Kaptoge; T W O'Neill
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2005-06-01       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  Patients with prior fractures have an increased risk of future fractures: a summary of the literature and statistical synthesis.

Authors:  C M Klotzbuecher; P D Ross; P B Landsman; T A Abbott; M Berger
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 6.741

6.  Using the SF-36 and Euroqol on an elderly population.

Authors:  J E Brazier; S J Walters; J P Nicholl; B Kohler
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 4.147

7.  A meta-analysis of previous fracture and subsequent fracture risk.

Authors:  J A Kanis; O Johnell; C De Laet; H Johansson; A Oden; P Delmas; J Eisman; S Fujiwara; P Garnero; H Kroger; E V McCloskey; D Mellstrom; L J Melton; H Pols; J Reeve; A Silman; A Tenenhouse
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 4.398

8.  Validating the SF-36 health survey questionnaire: new outcome measure for primary care.

Authors:  J E Brazier; R Harper; N M Jones; A O'Cathain; K J Thomas; T Usherwood; L Westlake
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1992-07-18

9.  Risk factors for proximal humerus fracture.

Authors:  Sarah P Chu; Jennifer L Kelsey; Theresa H M Keegan; Barbara Sternfeld; Mila Prill; Charles P Quesenberry; Stephen Sidney
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2004-08-15       Impact factor: 4.897

10.  Does a fracture at one site predict later fractures at other sites? A British cohort study.

Authors:  T P van Staa; H G M Leufkens; C Cooper
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 4.507

View more
  42 in total

1.  Vertebral compression fractures during chemotherapy for childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia: commentary on a report from the STeroid Associated Osteoporosis in the Pediatric Population (STOPP) research program.

Authors:  Kirsten K Ness; Wassim Chemaitilly; Sue C Kaste
Journal:  Transl Pediatr       Date:  2012-10

2.  The Ability of a Single BMD and Fracture History Assessment to Predict Fracture Over 25 Years in Postmenopausal Women: The Study of Osteoporotic Fractures.

Authors:  Dennis M Black; Jane A Cauley; Rachel Wagman; Kristine Ensrud; Howard A Fink; Teresa A Hillier; Li-Yung Lui; Steven R Cummings; John T Schousboe; Nicola Napoli
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2017-07-18       Impact factor: 6.741

Review 3.  Insights from the Global Longitudinal Study of Osteoporosis in Women (GLOW).

Authors:  Nelson B Watts
Journal:  Nat Rev Endocrinol       Date:  2014-04-22       Impact factor: 43.330

4.  Diagnostic criteria for osteoporosis should be expanded.

Authors:  Alexandra Papaioannou; Courtney Kennedy
Journal:  Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 32.069

5.  Unmasking romosozumab: response to commentsby Uzoigwe et al.

Authors:  F Cosman; D B Crittenden; C Libanati
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2017-02-17       Impact factor: 4.507

6.  [Identification, diagnostics and guideline conform therapy of osteoporosis (DVO) in trauma patients : a treatment algorithm].

Authors:  C Neuerburg; R Schmidmaier; S Schilling; C Kammerlander; W Böcker; W Mutschler; U Stumpf
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 1.000

7.  Preceding and subsequent high- and low-trauma fracture patterns-a 13-year epidemiological study in females and males in Austria.

Authors:  C Muschitz; R Kocijan; A Baierl; R Dormann; X Feichtinger; J Haschka; M Szivak; G K Muschitz; J Schanda; P Pietschmann; H Resch; H P Dimai
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2017-01-30       Impact factor: 4.507

8.  Prior fracture as a risk factor for future fracture in an Australian cohort.

Authors:  K L Holloway; S L Brennan; M A Kotowicz; G Bucki-Smith; E N Timney; A G Dobbins; L J Williams; J A Pasco
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2014-09-18       Impact factor: 4.507

9.  The impact of the new National Bone Health Alliance (NBHA) diagnostic criteria on the prevalence of osteoporosis in the USA.

Authors:  N C Wright; K G Saag; B Dawson-Hughes; S Khosla; E S Siris
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2016-12-13       Impact factor: 4.507

10.  Association between teriparatide adherence and healthcare utilization and costs in real-world US kyphoplasty/vertebroplasty patients.

Authors:  Y Zhao; S S Johnston; D M Smith; D McMorrow; K Krohn; J Krege
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2013-03-26       Impact factor: 4.507

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.