Literature DB >> 22113373

Contrasting patterns of niche partitioning between two anaerobic terminal oxidizers of organic matter.

Brian B Oakley1, Franck Carbonero, Scot E Dowd, Robert J Hawkins, Kevin J Purdy.   

Abstract

Understanding the ecological principles underlying the structure and function of microbial communities remains an important goal for microbial ecology. We examined two biogeochemically important taxa, the sulfate-reducing bacterial genus, Desulfobulbus, and the methanogenic archaeal genus, Methanosaeta, to compare and contrast niche partitioning by these two taxa that are ecologically linked as anaerobic terminal oxidizers of organic material. An observational approach utilizing functional gene pyrosequencing was combined with a community-based reciprocal incubation experiment and characterization of a novel Desulfobulbus isolate. To analyze the pyrosequencing data, we constructed a data analysis pipeline, which we validated with several control data sets. For both taxa, particular genotypes were clearly associated with certain portions of an estuarine gradient, consistent with habitat or niche partitioning. Methanosaeta genotypes were generally divided between those found almost exclusively in the marine habitat (∼30% of operational taxonomic units (OTUs)), and those which were ubiquitously distributed across all or most of the estuary (∼70% of OTUs). In contrast to this relatively monotonic distribution, for Desulfobulbus, there were many more genotypes, and their distributions represented a wide range of inferred niche widths from specialist genotypes found only at a single site, to ubiquitous or generalist genotypes found in all 10 sites examined along the full estuarine gradient. Incubation experiments clearly showed that, for both taxa, communities from opposite ends of the estuary did not come to resemble one another, regardless of the chemical environment. Growth of a Desulfobulbus isolated into pure culture indicated that the potential niche of this organism is significantly larger than the realized niche. We concluded that niche partitioning can be an important force structuring microbial populations, with biotic and abiotic components having very different effects depending on the physiology and ecology of each taxon.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22113373      PMCID: PMC3329114          DOI: 10.1038/ismej.2011.165

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  ISME J        ISSN: 1751-7362            Impact factor:   10.302


  40 in total

1.  DsrB gene-based DGGE for community and diversity surveys of sulfate-reducing bacteria.

Authors:  Joke Geets; Brigitte Borremans; Ludo Diels; Dirk Springael; Jaco Vangronsveld; Daniel van der Lelie; Karolien Vanbroekhoven
Journal:  J Microbiol Methods       Date:  2005-12-07       Impact factor: 2.363

2.  Cd-hit: a fast program for clustering and comparing large sets of protein or nucleotide sequences.

Authors:  Weizhong Li; Adam Godzik
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2006-05-26       Impact factor: 6.937

3.  Genotypic distribution of an indigenous model microorganism along an estuarine gradient.

Authors:  Robert J Hawkins; Kevin J Purdy
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Ecol       Date:  2007-09-10       Impact factor: 4.194

4.  Occupancy, spatial variance, and the abundance of species.

Authors:  Fangliang He; Kevin J Gaston
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2003-09-05       Impact factor: 3.926

5.  Resource partitioning and sympatric differentiation among closely related bacterioplankton.

Authors:  Dana E Hunt; Lawrence A David; Dirk Gevers; Sarah P Preheim; Eric J Alm; Martin F Polz
Journal:  Science       Date:  2008-05-23       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  ThermoPhyl: a software tool for selecting phylogenetically optimized conventional and quantitative-PCR taxon-targeted assays for use with complex samples.

Authors:  Brian B Oakley; Scot E Dowd; Kevin J Purdy
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Ecol       Date:  2011-03-21       Impact factor: 4.194

7.  Rapid Extraction of DNA and rRNA from Sediments by a Novel Hydroxyapatite Spin-Column Method.

Authors:  K J Purdy; T M Embley; S Takii; D B Nedwell
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 4.792

8.  Ironing out the wrinkles in the rare biosphere through improved OTU clustering.

Authors:  Susan M Huse; David Mark Welch; Hilary G Morrison; Mitchell L Sogin
Journal:  Environ Microbiol       Date:  2010-03-11       Impact factor: 5.491

Review 9.  Prokaryotes: the unseen majority.

Authors:  W B Whitman; D C Coleman; W J Wiebe
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1998-06-09       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  MUSCLE: a multiple sequence alignment method with reduced time and space complexity.

Authors:  Robert C Edgar
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2004-08-19       Impact factor: 3.169

View more
  14 in total

1.  Genotypic distribution of a specialist model microorganism, Methanosaeta, along an estuarine gradient: does metabolic restriction limit niche differentiation potential?

Authors:  Franck Carbonero; Brian B Oakley; Robert J Hawkins; Kevin J Purdy
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2011-12-20       Impact factor: 4.552

2.  Methyl coenzyme M reductase A (mcrA) gene-based investigation of methanogens in the mudflat sediments of Yangtze River estuary, China.

Authors:  Jemaneh Zeleke; Shui-Long Lu; Jian-Gong Wang; Jing-Xin Huang; Bo Li; Andrew V Ogram; Zhe-Xue Quan
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2013-01-11       Impact factor: 4.552

3.  A comparison of rpoB and 16S rRNA as markers in pyrosequencing studies of bacterial diversity.

Authors:  Michiel Vos; Christopher Quince; Agata S Pijl; Mattias de Hollander; George A Kowalchuk
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-02-15       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Comparative analysis of the intestinal bacterial and RNA viral communities from sentinel birds placed on selected broiler chicken farms.

Authors:  J Michael Day; Brian B Oakley; Bruce S Seal; Laszlo Zsak
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-01-30       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Successional changes in the chicken cecal microbiome during 42 days of growth are independent of organic acid feed additives.

Authors:  Brian B Oakley; R Jeff Buhr; Casey W Ritz; Brian H Kiepper; Mark E Berrang; Bruce S Seal; Nelson A Cox
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2014-11-27       Impact factor: 2.741

6.  Characterizing the distribution and rates of microbial sulfate reduction at Middle Valley hydrothermal vents.

Authors:  Kiana L Frank; Daniel R Rogers; Heather C Olins; Charles Vidoudez; Peter R Girguis
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2013-03-28       Impact factor: 10.302

7.  The poultry-associated microbiome: network analysis and farm-to-fork characterizations.

Authors:  Brian B Oakley; Cesar A Morales; J Line; Mark E Berrang; Richard J Meinersmann; Glenn E Tillman; Mark G Wise; Gregory R Siragusa; Kelli L Hiett; Bruce S Seal
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-02-27       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Archaeal community diversity and abundance changes along a natural salinity gradient in estuarine sediments.

Authors:  Gordon Webster; Louise A O'Sullivan; Yiyu Meng; Angharad S Williams; Andrea M Sass; Andrew J Watkins; R John Parkes; Andrew J Weightman
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Ecol       Date:  2014-12-15       Impact factor: 4.194

9.  FunGene: the functional gene pipeline and repository.

Authors:  Jordan A Fish; Benli Chai; Qiong Wang; Yanni Sun; C Titus Brown; James M Tiedje; James R Cole
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2013-10-01       Impact factor: 5.640

10.  Metabolic flexibility as a major predictor of spatial distribution in microbial communities.

Authors:  Franck Carbonero; Brian B Oakley; Kevin J Purdy
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-01-21       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.