Literature DB >> 12102408

Cranio-facial distraction osteogenesis: a review of the literature. Part II: Experimental studies.

G Swennen1, R Dempf, H Schliephake.   

Abstract

In this study the literature dealing with experimental cranio-facial distraction osteogenesis (DO) was reviewed. A PUBMED search (National Library of Medicine [NCBI] revised 1 April 2001) from 1966 through December 2000 was conducted. Key words used in the search were: distraction, lengthening, mandible, mandibular, maxilla, maxillary, midface, midfacial, monobloc, cranial, cranio-facial, maxillofacial. This search revealed a total of 120 experiment-orientated articles that were all analyzed in detail in this study. The purpose of the experimental study, animal model, animal growth status, type of distraction, type of surgery, distraction rate and rhythm, latency and contention period, amount of lengthening, relapse, complications and nature of the distraction device were analyzed. This review revealed that a total of 1207 animals were used in seven different animal models for research on cranio-facial DO: 54 using dogs (45.0%), 25 using rabbits (20.8%), 18 using sheep (15.0%), 11 using minipig (9.2%), seven using monkeys (5.8%), four using rats (3.3%) and one using a cat model (0.8%). Based on the results of this study, an attempt was made to provide biological DO parameters and guidelines for future research on experimental cranio-facial DO related to the appropriate animal model.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12102408     DOI: 10.1054/ijom.2002.0225

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg        ISSN: 0901-5027            Impact factor:   2.789


  12 in total

1.  Bifocal distraction to regenerate segmental mandibular defects using a custom made device: a report of two cases.

Authors:  Sriram Krishnan; Ramkumar Subramaniam
Journal:  Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr       Date:  2010-06

2.  Effect of vitamin C on bone formation in the expanded inter-premaxillary suture. Early bone changes.

Authors:  Tancan Uysal; Mihri Amasyali; Huseyin Olmez; Sukru Enhos; Yildirim Karslioglu; Omer Gunhan
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 1.938

Review 3.  Bone regeneration during distraction osteogenesis.

Authors:  Lisa R Amir; Vincent Everts; Antonius L J J Bronckers
Journal:  Odontology       Date:  2009-07-29       Impact factor: 2.634

4.  The Effect of Bone Marrow Mesenchymal Stem Cells Application on Distracted Bone Quality during Rapid Rate of Distraction Osteogenesis.

Authors:  Marwa El Kassaby; Khaled Abd El Kader; Nahed Khamis; Alaa Al Hammoud; Alaa Ben Talb; Yasser Nabil El Hadidi
Journal:  Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr       Date:  2017-07-19

5.  The effect of different concentrations of topical ozone administration on bone formation in orthopedically expanded suture in rats.

Authors:  S Kutalmış Buyuk; Sabri Ilhan Ramoglu; Mehmet Fatih Sonmez
Journal:  Eur J Orthod       Date:  2015-07-01       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 6.  Periosteal Distraction Osteogenesis: An Effective Method for Bone Regeneration.

Authors:  Danyang Zhao; Yu Wang; Dong Han
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2016-12-18       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 7.  Minor Review: An Overview of a Synthetic Nanophase Bone Substitute.

Authors:  Steven J Eppell; Weidong Tong; James McMasters; Yohannes Soenjaya; Anca M Barbu; Alvin Ko; Jonathan Z Baskin
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2018-08-29       Impact factor: 3.623

8.  Cephalometric studies of the mandible, its masticatory muscles and vasculature of growing Göttingen Minipigs-A comparative anatomical study to refine experimental mandibular surgery.

Authors:  Giuliano Mario Corte; Hana Hünigen; Kenneth C Richardson; Stefan M Niehues; Johanna Plendl
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-04-25       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Histological and physical analysis of bone neoformation by osteogenesis distraction: A preliminary report.

Authors:  Marcello Gaieta Vannucci; Juliana Dreyer; Paulo Kreisner; Leonilson Gaião; João Feliz Duarte Moraes; Marilia Gerhardt de Oliveira
Journal:  Ann Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2011-01

Review 10.  Review of automatic continuous distraction osteogenesis devices for mandibular reconstruction applications.

Authors:  Shahrokh Hatefi; Katayoun Hatefi; Francis Le Roux; Javad Alizargar; Zeinolabedin Behdadipour; Yimesker Yihun; Khaled Abou-El-Hossein
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2020-04-01       Impact factor: 2.819

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.