Literature DB >> 3312622

Internal fixation vs. conventional therapy in midface fractures.

D W Klotch1, R Gilliland.   

Abstract

The purpose of this review is to evaluate internal fixation by means of AO miniplates compared to conventional therapy for the treatment of complicated midface fractures. A more precise division of midface fractures into functional units than that afforded by the Le Fort classification was employed to categorize the complexity of injury. The criteria of evaluation were ease of functional rehabilitation, incidence of complications, and results of surgery. The classification system was helpful in surgical planning and in subsequent analysis of results. Forty-nine of the 92 midface fractures treated by open repair between July 1980 and January 1986 were malar fractures, and 41 of these had associated orbital fractures. The remaining 43 had Le Fort II or more complicated midface fractures, only 15 of which could be adequately categorized by the Le Fort classification. Twenty-two of the 43 patients with complicated midface fractures were surgically treated with internal fixation utilizing 67 AO miniplates. The remaining 21 patients were treated with conventional therapy utilizing a combination of intermaxillary fixation (IMF), and/or interosseous wiring, and/or primary bone grafting. Among the problems encountered were a nonunion of the midface in a delayed repair of a severely comminuted midface fracture, which required secondary split rib grafting. Three plates were removed because of intraoral extrusion. There were no plate-related infections. One of the advantages of internal fixation is that the need for primary bone grafting and external fixation is eliminated. Another is that intermaxillary fixation is needed less frequently, allowing immediate access to the oral cavity for control of airway, care of intraoral wounds, and rapid return to normal alimentation with full mandibular function. Most patients with no associated GI problems tolerated a soft diet within 6 days. Tracheostomy tubes were removed within 3 days if no pulmonary failure was present. We can conclude that internal fixation provides excellent stabilization and repair of complicated midface injuries with minimal complications and rapid return to function for most patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3312622     DOI: 10.1097/00005373-198710000-00008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Trauma        ISSN: 0022-5282


  4 in total

1.  Complications of rigid internal fixation.

Authors:  Chris A Campbell; Kant Y Lin
Journal:  Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr       Date:  2009-03

2.  Retained broken implants in the craniomaxillofacial skeleton.

Authors:  Vigneswaran Nallathamby; Hanjing Lee; Yap Yan Lin; Jane Lim; Wei Chen Ong; Thiam-Chye Lim
Journal:  Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr       Date:  2014-03-11

3.  Evaluation of soft tissue asymmetry using cone-beam computed tomography after open reduction and internal fixation of zygomaticomaxillary complex fracture.

Authors:  Dong Hyuck Kim; Rae Hyong Kim; Jun Lee; Young Deok Chee; Kyung Hwan Kwon; Kyoung-Hwan Kwon
Journal:  J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2014-06-27

Review 4.  Bone Healing and Inflammation: Principles of Fracture and Repair.

Authors:  Hassan ElHawary; Aslan Baradaran; Jad Abi-Rafeh; Joshua Vorstenbosch; Liqin Xu; Johnny Ionut Efanov
Journal:  Semin Plast Surg       Date:  2021-09-10       Impact factor: 2.195

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.