Literature DB >> 2211054

The role of the reference radiologist. Estimates of inter-observer agreement and potential delay in cancer detection in the national breast screening study.

C J Baines1, D V McFarlane, A B Miller.   

Abstract

The Canadian National Breast Screening Study (NBSS) is a randomized controlled trial to assess the effect of screening on breast cancer mortality. The NBSS designated a single reference radiologist who blindly reviewed over the course of the study 5200 randomly selected two-view mammographic examinations of women not known to have breast cancer. He also reviewed 575 screening-detected breast cancer (SBC) cases and 102 interval breast cancer (IBC) cases. All cancers were histologically proven. As a result of the reviews, comments on inter-observer agreement, interpretation, and technical quality were conveyed on an ongoing basis to radiologists appointed to 15 NBSS screening centers. Agreement of the reference radiologist with center radiologists was better for breast cancer cases (kappa = 0.511, P less than .002) than for those not known to have breast cancer (kappa = 0.307, P less than .002). Observer error and technical problems led to delayed detection in 22% of SBCs and 35% of IBCs. Another 11% of SBCs and 58% of IBCs were probably mammographically occult. No similarly comprehensive review of mammography during a screening program has been published. Suggestions arising from the NBSS review were sometimes resisted by center radiologists. Measures are suggested which might facilitate acceptance of recommendations arising from audit mechanisms in mammography screening programs, thereby enhancing opportunities for mammographic excellence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2211054     DOI: 10.1097/00004424-199009000-00002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Invest Radiol        ISSN: 0020-9996            Impact factor:   6.016


  13 in total

1.  The Canadian National Breast Screening Study: a clinician's perspective.

Authors:  A A Starreveld
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1992-11-15       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  Examining accuracy of screening mammography using an event order model.

Authors:  Prashni Paliwal; Alan E Gelfand; Linn Abraham; William Barlow; Joann G Elmore
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2006-01-30       Impact factor: 2.373

3.  Mammographic mass detection using a mass template.

Authors:  Serhat Ozekes; Onur Osman; A Yilmaz Camurcu
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2005 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 3.500

4.  The Canadian National Breast Screening Study: opportunity for a rethink.

Authors:  A S Basinski
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1992-11-15       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 5.  Computer-assisted reading of mammograms.

Authors:  N Karssemeijer; J H Hendriks
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Advances in breast cancer detection with screening mammography.

Authors:  J L Champaign; G J Cederbom
Journal:  Ochsner J       Date:  2000-01

7.  Canadian National Breast Screening Study.

Authors:  J J Caro; J A O'Brien; S C Hartz
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1993-03-15       Impact factor: 8.262

8.  Canadian National Breast Screening Study.

Authors:  H J Burhenne
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1993-03-15       Impact factor: 8.262

9.  Screening mammograms by community radiologists: variability in false-positive rates.

Authors:  Joann G Elmore; Diana L Miglioretti; Lisa M Reisch; Mary B Barton; William Kreuter; Cindy L Christiansen; Suzanne W Fletcher
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2002-09-18       Impact factor: 13.506

10.  Canadian National Breast Screening Study: 1. Breast cancer detection and death rates among women aged 40 to 49 years.

Authors:  A B Miller; C J Baines; T To; C Wall
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1992-11-15       Impact factor: 8.262

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.