Literature DB >> 9166576

Computer-assisted reading of mammograms.

N Karssemeijer1, J H Hendriks.   

Abstract

Techniques developed in computer vision and automated pattern recognition can be applied to assist radiologists in reading mammograms. With the introduction of direct digital mammography this will become a feasible approach. A radiologist in breast cancer screening can use findings of the computer as a second opinion, or as a pointer to suspicious regions. This may increase the sensitivity and specificity of screening programs, and it may avoid the need for double reading. In this paper methods which have been developed for automated detection of mammographic abnormalities are reviewed. Programs for detecting microcalcification clusters and stellate lesions have reached a level of performance which makes application in practice viable. Current programs for recognition of masses and asymmetry perform less well. Large-scale studies still have to demonstrate if radiologists in a screening situation can deal with the relatively large number of false positives which are marked by computer programs, where the number of normal cases is much higher than in observer experiments conducted thus far.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9166576     DOI: 10.1007/BF02742937

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   5.315


  15 in total

1.  Automatic computer detection of clustered calcifications in digital mammograms.

Authors:  D H Davies; D R Dance
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  1990-08       Impact factor: 3.609

2.  Improvement in radiologists' detection of clustered microcalcifications on mammograms. The potential of computer-aided diagnosis.

Authors:  H P Chan; K Doi; C J Vyborny; R A Schmidt; C E Metz; K L Lam; T Ogura; Y Z Wu; H MacMahon
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 6.016

3.  Free-response methodology: alternate analysis and a new observer-performance experiment.

Authors:  D P Chakraborty; L H Winter
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  Can computers help radiologists read mammograms?

Authors:  C J Vyborny
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  The current detectability of breast cancer in a mammographic screening program. A review of the previous mammograms of interval and screen-detected cancers.

Authors:  J A van Dijck; A L Verbeek; J H Hendriks; R Holland
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1993-09-15       Impact factor: 6.860

6.  Computer-aided mammographic screening for spiculated lesions.

Authors:  W P Kegelmeyer; J M Pruneda; P D Bourland; A Hillis; M W Riggs; M L Nipper
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  Wavelet transforms for detecting microcalcifications in mammograms.

Authors:  R N Strickland; H I Hahn
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 10.048

8.  Analysis of cancers missed at screening mammography.

Authors:  R E Bird; T W Wallace; B C Yankaskas
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  Previous mammograms in patients with impalpable breast carcinoma: retrospective vs blinded interpretation. 1993 ARRS President's Award.

Authors:  J A Harvey; L L Fajardo; C A Innis
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 3.959

10.  Report of the International Workshop on Screening for Breast Cancer.

Authors:  S W Fletcher; W Black; R Harris; B K Rimer; S Shapiro
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1993-10-20       Impact factor: 13.506

View more
  4 in total

1.  Soft copy versus hard copy reading in digital mammography.

Authors:  Silvia Obenauer; Klaus-Peter Hermann; Katharina Marten; Susanne Luftner-Nagel; Dorit von Heyden; Per Skaane; Eckhardt Grabbe
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2004-01-30       Impact factor: 4.056

2.  Effect of breast density on computer aided detection.

Authors:  Ansgar Malich; Dorothee R Fischer; Mirjam Facius; Alexander Petrovitch; Joachim Boettcher; Christiane Marx; Andreas Hansch; Werner A Kaiser
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 4.056

3.  Fuzzy technique for microcalcifications clustering in digital mammograms.

Authors:  Letizia Vivona; Donato Cascio; Francesco Fauci; Giuseppe Raso
Journal:  BMC Med Imaging       Date:  2014-06-24       Impact factor: 1.930

4.  A Hybrid Image Filtering Method for Computer-Aided Detection of Microcalcification Clusters in Mammograms.

Authors:  Xiaoyong Zhang; Noriyasu Homma; Shotaro Goto; Yosuke Kawasumi; Tadashi Ishibashi; Makoto Abe; Norihiro Sugita; Makoto Yoshizawa
Journal:  J Med Eng       Date:  2013-04-14
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.