Literature DB >> 22105249

Long-term survival of women with epithelial ovarian cancer detected by ultrasonographic screening.

John Rensselaer van Nagell1, Rachel Ware Miller, Christopher P DeSimone, Frederick R Ueland, Iwona Podzielinski, Scott T Goodrich, Jeff W Elder, Bin Huang, Richard J Kryscio, Edward John Pavlik.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the effect of ultrasonographic screening on stage at detection and long-term disease-specific survival of women with epithelial ovarian cancer.
METHODS: Eligibility included all asymptomatic women aged 50 years and older and women aged 25 years and older with a documented family history of ovarian cancer. From 1987 to 2011, 37,293 women received annual ultrasonographic screening. Women with abnormal screens underwent tumor morphology indexing, serum biomarker analysis, and surgery.
RESULTS: Forty-seven invasive epithelial ovarian cancers and 15 epithelial ovarian tumors of low malignant potential were detected. No women with low malignant potential tumors experienced recurrent disease. Stage distribution for invasive epithelial cancers was: stage I, 22 (47%); stage II, 11 (23%); stage III, 14 (30%), and stage IV, 0 (0%). Follow-up varied from 2 months to 20.1 years (mean, 5.8 years). The 5-year survival rate for invasive epithelial ovarian cancers detected by screening was: stage I, 95%±4.8%; stage II, 77.1%±14.5%; and stage III, 76.2%±12.1%. The 5-year survival rate for all women with invasive epithelial ovarian cancer detected by screening as well as interval cancers was 74.8%±6.6% compared with 53.7%±2.3% for unscreened women with ovarian cancer from the same institution treated by the same surgical and chemotherapeutic protocols (P<.001).
CONCLUSION: Annual ultrasonographic screening of asymptomatic women achieved increased detection of early-stage ovarian cancer cases and an increase in 5-year disease-specific survival rate for women with ovarian cancer. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22105249     DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e318238d030

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.661


  36 in total

1.  Three-dimensional texture analysis of optical coherence tomography images of ovarian tissue.

Authors:  Travis W Sawyer; Swati Chandra; Photini F S Rice; Jennifer W Koevary; Jennifer K Barton
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2018-12-04       Impact factor: 3.609

2.  Screening for ovarian cancer: imaging challenges and opportunities for improvement.

Authors:  K B Mathieu; D G Bedi; S L Thrower; A Qayyum; R C Bast
Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 7.299

3.  Factors associated with deciding between risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy and ovarian cancer screening among high-risk women enrolled in GOG-0199: An NRG Oncology/Gynecologic Oncology Group study.

Authors:  Phuong L Mai; Marion Piedmonte; Paul K Han; Richard P Moser; Joan L Walker; Gustavo Rodriguez; John Boggess; Thomas J Rutherford; Oliver Zivanovic; David E Cohn; J Tate Thigpen; Robert M Wenham; Michael L Friedlander; Chad A Hamilton; Jamie Bakkum-Gamez; Alexander B Olawaiye; Martee L Hensley; Mark H Greene; Helen Q Huang; Lari Wenzel
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2017-02-10       Impact factor: 5.482

4.  S3-Guideline on Diagnostics, Therapy and Follow-up of Malignant Ovarian Tumours: Short version 1.0 - AWMF registration number: 032/035OL, June 2013.

Authors:  U Wagner; P Harter; F Hilpert; S Mahner; A Reuß; A du Bois; E Petru; W Meier; P Ortner; K König; K Lindel; D Grab; P Piso; O Ortmann; I Runnebaum; J Pfisterer; D Lüftner; N Frickhofen; F Grünwald; B O Maier; J Diebold; S Hauptmann; F Kommoss; G Emons; B Radeleff; M Gebhardt; N Arnold; G Calaminus; I Weisse; J Weis; J Sehouli; D Fink; A Burges; A Hasenburg; C Eggert
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 2.915

5.  SEOM clinical guideline for secondary prevention (2019).

Authors:  A Santaballa; Á Pinto; R P Balanyà; N Ramírez Merino; I R Martín; S S Grau; J P B Fombella; J M Cano; C H González; J Bayo
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2020-01-31       Impact factor: 3.405

6.  Demographic, clinical, dispositional, and social-environmental characteristics associated with psychological response to a false positive ovarian cancer screening test: a longitudinal study.

Authors:  Amanda T Wiggins; Edward J Pavlik; Michael A Andrykowski
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2017-10-25

7.  Before it catches the eye….

Authors:  Marian J Mourits; Geertruida H de Bock
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2019-12

Review 8.  Novel Approaches to Ovarian Cancer Screening.

Authors:  Denise R Nebgen; Karen H Lu; Robert C Bast
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2019-07-26       Impact factor: 5.075

9.  Clinical background and outcomes of risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy for hereditary breast and ovarian cancers in Japan.

Authors:  Hidetaka Nomura; Masayuki Sekine; Shiro Yokoyama; Masami Arai; Takayuki Enomoto; Nobuhiro Takeshima; Seigo Nakamura
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2019-05-04       Impact factor: 3.402

10.  Risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy and ovarian cancer screening in 1077 women after BRCA testing.

Authors:  Gabriel N Mannis; Julia E Fehniger; Jennifer S Creasman; Vanessa L Jacoby; Mary S Beattie
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2013-01-28       Impact factor: 21.873

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.