Literature DB >> 29071653

Demographic, clinical, dispositional, and social-environmental characteristics associated with psychological response to a false positive ovarian cancer screening test: a longitudinal study.

Amanda T Wiggins1, Edward J Pavlik2, Michael A Andrykowski3.   

Abstract

Cancer screening can facilitate early detection that improves survival, but also can identify an abnormal finding that is not malignant and deemed benign. While such false positive (FP) results can impact a variety of psychological outcomes, little is known about demographic, clinical, dispositional, and social-environmental characteristics associated with psychological outcomes after a FP result. Women participating in an ovarian cancer (OC) screening program and experiencing a FP screening test result (n = 375) completed assessments at baseline and 4-months. Results indicated greater social constraint and less education were linked to greater OC-specific distress at both assessments. Short-term predictors included less optimism and no previous abnormal test, while longer-term predictors were fewer previous screens and the interaction between OC family history and monitoring coping style. Younger age, less education, less optimism, greater social constraint, and family history of OC were associated with greater perceptions of OC risk. Brief interventions prior to screening may minimize the negative impact of a false positive result and not interfere with compliant participation in screening programs.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cancer screening; Cancer-specific distress; False-positive; Ovarian cancer; Perceived risk

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29071653     DOI: 10.1007/s10865-017-9897-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Behav Med        ISSN: 0160-7715


  46 in total

1.  Applications of the monitoring process model to coping with severe long-term medical threats.

Authors:  S M Miller; M Rodoletz; C E Mangan; C M Schroeder; T V Sedlacek
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 4.267

2.  Changes in cancer worry associated with participation in ovarian cancer screening.

Authors:  M Robyn Andersen; Charles W Drescher; Yingye Zheng; Deborah J Bowen; Susan Wilson; Alicia Young; Martin McIntosh; Barry S Mahony; Kimberly A Lowe; Nicole Urban
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 3.894

Review 3.  A meta-analysis of the relationship between social constraints and distress in cancer patients.

Authors:  Rebecca N Adams; Joseph G Winger; Catherine E Mosher
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2014-09-28

Review 4.  Stress, social support, and the buffering hypothesis.

Authors:  S Cohen; T A Wills
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1985-09       Impact factor: 17.737

Review 5.  Systematic review: the long-term effects of false-positive mammograms.

Authors:  Noel T Brewer; Talya Salz; Sarah E Lillie
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2007-04-03       Impact factor: 25.391

6.  Ovarian carcinoma screening in women at intermediate risk: impact on quality of life and need for invasive follow-up.

Authors:  Noah D Kauff; Karen E Hurley; Martee L Hensley; Mark E Robson; Gali Lev; Deborah Goldfrank; Mercedes Castiel; Carol L Brown; Jamie S Ostroff; Lucy E Hann; Kenneth Offit; Richard R Barakat
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2005-07-15       Impact factor: 6.860

7.  Psychological impact of screening for familial ovarian cancer.

Authors:  F J Wardle; W Collins; A L Pernet; M I Whitehead; T H Bourne; S Campbell
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1993-04-21       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 8.  Ultrasound screening for the early detection of ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Paul D DePriest; Christopher P DeSimone
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2003-05-15       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  Psychological outcomes of familial ovarian cancer screening: no evidence of long-term harm.

Authors:  Kate E Brain; Kate J Lifford; Lindsay Fraser; Adam N Rosenthal; Mark T Rogers; Deborah Lancastle; Ceri Phelps; Eila K Watson; Alison Clements; Usha Menon
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2012-08-31       Impact factor: 5.482

10.  Psychological morbidity associated with ovarian cancer screening: results from more than 23,000 women in the randomised trial of ovarian cancer screening (UKCTOCS).

Authors:  J Barrett; V Jenkins; V Farewell; U Menon; I Jacobs; J Kilkerr; A Ryan; C Langridge; L Fallowfield
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2014-05-28       Impact factor: 6.531

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.