Literature DB >> 22102952

Postoperative survival and ambulatory outcome in metastatic spinal tumors : prognostic factor analysis.

Kyung Yun Moon1, Chun Kee Chung, Tae-Ahn Jahng, Hyun Jib Kim, Chi Heon Kim.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purposes of this study are to estimate postoperative survival and ambulatory outcome and to identify prognostic factors thereafter of metastatic spinal tumors in a single institute.
METHODS: We reviewed the medical records of 182 patients who underwent surgery for a metastatic spinal tumor from January 1987 to January 2009 retrospectively. Twelve potential prognostic factors (age, gender, primary tumor, extent and location of spinal metastases, interval between primary tumor diagnosis and metastatic spinal cord compression, preoperative treatment, surgical approach and extent, preoperative Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status, Nurick score, Tokuhashi and Tomita score) were investigated.
RESULTS: The median survival of the entire patients was 8 months. Of the 182 patients, 80 (44%) died within 6 months after surgery, 113 (62%) died within 1 year after surgery, 138 (76%) died within 2 years after surgery. Postoperatively 47 (26%) patients had improvement in ambulatory function, 126 (69%) had no change, and 9 (5%) had deterioration. On multivariate analysis, better ambulatory outcome was associated with being ambulatory before surgery (p=0.026) and lower preoperative ECOG score (p=0.016). Survival rate was affected by preoperative ECOG performance status (p<0.001) and Tomita score (p<0.001).
CONCLUSION: Survival after metastatic spinal tumor surgery was dependent on preoperative ECOG performance status and Tomita score. The ambulatory functional outcomes after surgery were dependent on preoperative ambulatory status and preoperative ECOG performance status. Thus, prompt decompressive surgery may be warranted to improve patient's survival and gait, before general condition and ambulatory function of patient become worse.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Ambulatory outcome; Prognosis; Spinal metastasis; Surgery; Survival

Year:  2011        PMID: 22102952      PMCID: PMC3218181          DOI: 10.3340/jkns.2011.50.3.216

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc        ISSN: 1225-8245


  24 in total

1.  Prognostic factors for functional outcome and survival after reirradiation for in-field recurrences of metastatic spinal cord compression.

Authors:  Dirk Rades; Volker Rudat; Theo Veninga; Lukas J A Stalpers; Peter J Hoskin; Steven E Schild
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2008-09-01       Impact factor: 6.860

2.  Prognostic factors predicting functional outcomes, recurrence-free survival, and overall survival after radiotherapy for metastatic spinal cord compression in breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Dirk Rades; Theo Veninga; Lukas J A Stalpers; Rainer Schulte; Peter J Hoskin; Philip Poortmans; Steven E Schild; Volker Rudat
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2005-09-28       Impact factor: 7.038

3.  Metastatic spinal cord compression: radiotherapy outcome and dose fractionation.

Authors:  Peter J Hoskin; Amit Grover; Rajanee Bhana
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 6.280

4.  Epidural spinal cord compression from metastatic tumor: diagnosis and treatment.

Authors:  R W Gilbert; J H Kim; J B Posner
Journal:  Ann Neurol       Date:  1978-01       Impact factor: 10.422

Review 5.  Spinal extradural metastasis: review of current treatment options.

Authors:  Ronald H M A Bartels; Yvette M van der Linden; Winette T A van der Graaf
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2008-03-19       Impact factor: 508.702

6.  The surgical management of metastatic spinal disease: prospective assessment and long-term follow-up.

Authors:  R J Mannion; M Wilby; S Godward; G Lyratzopoulos; R J C Laing
Journal:  Br J Neurosurg       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 1.596

7.  Vertebral body resection in the treatment of cancer involving the spine.

Authors:  N Sundaresan; J H Galicich; M S Bains; N Martini; E J Beattie
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1984-03-15       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 8.  Metastatic epidural spinal cord compression.

Authors:  John S Cole; Roy A Patchell
Journal:  Lancet Neurol       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 44.182

9.  Surgical resection plus adjuvant radiotherapy is superior to surgery or radiotherapy alone in the prevention of neurological decline in a rat metastatic spinal tumor model.

Authors:  Beril Gok; Matthew McGirt; Daniel M Sciubba; Selim Ayhan; Ali Bydon; Timothy F Witham; Jean-Paul Wolinsky; Ziya L Gokaslan
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 4.654

10.  Clinical outcome and survival after palliative surgery for spinal metastases: palliative surgery in spinal metastases.

Authors:  Hiroki Hirabayashi; Sohei Ebara; Tetsuya Kinoshita; Yohei Yuzawa; Isao Nakamura; Jun Takahashi; Mikio Kamimura; Kuniyoshi Ohtsuka; Kunio Takaoka
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2003-01-15       Impact factor: 6.860

View more
  13 in total

1.  Surgery and survival outcomes of 30 patients with neurological deficit due to clear cell renal cell carcinoma spinal metastases.

Authors:  Shuai Han; Ting Wang; Dongjie Jiang; Yang Yu; Yu Wang; Wangjun Yan; Wei Xu; Ming Cheng; Wang Zhou; Jianru Xiao
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-04-04       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Which one is a valuable surrogate for predicting survival between Tomita and Tokuhashi scores in patients with spinal metastases? A meta-analysis for diagnostic test accuracy and individual participant data analysis.

Authors:  Chang-Hyun Lee; Chun Kee Chung; Tae-Ahn Jahng; Ki-jeong Kim; Chi Heon Kim; Seung-Jae Hyun; Hyun-Jib Kim; Sang Ryong Jeon; Ung-Kyu Chang; Sun-Ho Lee; Seong-Hwan Moon; Haroon Majeed; Dan Zhang; Gwenaelle Gravis; Christine Wibmer; Naresh Kumar; Kyung Yun Moon; Jin Hoon Park; Emeline Tabouret; Stephane Fuentes
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2015-05-07       Impact factor: 4.130

3.  Outcomes of surgical treatments of spinal metastases: a prospective study.

Authors:  C Bouthors; S Prost; C Court; B Blondel; Y P Charles; S Fuentes; H P Mousselard; C Mazel; C H Flouzat-Lachaniette; P Bonnevialle; F Saihlan
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2019-08-09       Impact factor: 3.603

4.  Moderate precision of prognostic scoring systems in a consecutive, prospective cohort of 544 patients with metastatic spinal cord compression.

Authors:  Søren Schmidt Morgen; Dennis Hallager Nielsen; Claus Falck Larsen; Rikke Søgaard; Svend Aage Engelholm; Benny Dahl
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-07-18       Impact factor: 4.553

5.  [Solitary spinal metastases. Is aggressive surgical management justified?].

Authors:  C Druschel; A C Disch; M Pumberger; P Schwabe; I Melcher; N P Haas; K-D Schaser
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 1.087

6.  Analysis of prognostic factors relating to postoperative survival in spinal metastases.

Authors:  Soon Bum Yang; Wonik Cho; Ung-Kyu Chang
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2012-03-31

Review 7.  Evaluating ambulatory function as an outcome following treatment for spinal metastases: a systematic review.

Authors:  Lananh Nguyen; Nicole Agaronnik; Marco L Ferrone; Jeffrey N Katz; Andrew J Schoenfeld
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2021-05-13       Impact factor: 4.297

8.  Metastatic spinal cord compression (MSCC) treated with palliative decompression: Surgical timing and survival rate.

Authors:  Wan-Yu Lo; Shu-Hua Yang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-12-29       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Prediction of survival prognosis after surgery in patients with symptomatic metastatic spinal cord compression from non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Mingxing Lei; Yaosheng Liu; Chuanghao Tang; Shaoxing Yang; Shubin Liu; Shiguo Zhou
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2015-11-05       Impact factor: 4.430

10.  Analysis of the predictive role and new proposal for surgical strategies based on the modified Tomita and Tokuhashi scoring systems for spinal metastasis.

Authors:  Junhyung Kim; Sun-Ho Lee; Se-Jun Park; Sung-Soo Chung; Eun-Sang Kim; Whan Eoh; Chong-Suh Lee
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2014-08-01       Impact factor: 2.754

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.