Literature DB >> 22101692

TrueFISP of the pediatric pineal gland: volumetric and microstructural analysis.

J M Bumb1, M A Brockmann, C Groden, M Al-Zghloul, I Nölte.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Although high-resolution 3D-imaging has markedly improved the imaging of the pediatric pineal gland, the prevalences of typical and atypical cysts as well as in vivo volumes are unknown. The purpose of this study was to compare the frequency of typical and atypical cysts using high-resolution 3D-sequence true fast imaging with steady state precession (trueFISP) and standard sequences and to directly measure the pineal volume in a large pediatric population.
METHODS: In 54 consecutively examined children (age 0-17 years, mean age 5.4 ± 5.6 years, 44% female, 56% male) the prevalence of typical and atypical cysts (thickened rim, trabeculations, asymmetry) was determined using trueFISP (isotropic, 0.8 mm) and standard sequences, 1.5-T, T1-weighted spin echo (T1-SE), T2-weighted turbo spin echo (T2-TSE) and fluid attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR). Indistinct findings were noted separately. Volumetry was based on the trueFISP datasets. Solid and cystic compartments were approached separately. The pineal volume was correlated to gender and age.
RESULTS: The detected frequency of pineal cysts was higher in trueFISP (57.4%) than in standard sequences (T1-SE 7.4%, T2-TSE 14.8%, and FLAIR 13.0%). In trueFISP 66.3% of the detected cysts were classified as atypical (standard sequences 0%). Indistinct findings were lowest in trueFISP. The mean pineal volume was 94.3 ± 159.1 mm³ and no gender related differences were found. Age and volume showed a moderate correlation (r = 0.382) which was remarkably higher in completely solid glands (r = 0.659).
CONCLUSIONS: TrueFISP imaging improves the detection of pineal cysts in children. A typical cysts are frequently detected as an incidental finding. Volumetric analysis of the pediatric pineal gland is feasible and reveals enormous variation. Whereas gender effects are negligible, the pineal volume in children is dependant on age.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22101692     DOI: 10.1007/s00062-011-0110-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Neuroradiol        ISSN: 1869-1439            Impact factor:   3.649


  38 in total

1.  [Cystic changes in the pineal body].

Authors:  L MEGYERI
Journal:  Frankf Z Pathol       Date:  1960

Review 2.  MR imaging of midbrain pathologies.

Authors:  E Hattingen; S Blasel; M Nichtweiss; F E Zanella; S Weidauer
Journal:  Clin Neuroradiol       Date:  2010-06-09       Impact factor: 3.649

3.  The Human Pineal Gland and Pineal Cysts.

Authors:  E R Cooper
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  1932-10       Impact factor: 2.610

4.  Response of the German Society of Neuroradiology to the guideline : "Ethically Appropriate Reaction to Incidental Imaging Findings in Brain Research", suggested by Thomas Heinemann, Institut für Wissenschaft und Ethik, and Christian Hoppe, Klinik für Epileptologie, Universität Bonn, Germany, on January 9, 2009.

Authors:  Frank Hentschel; Rüdiger von Kummer
Journal:  Klin Neuroradiol       Date:  2009-06

5.  Lack of pineal growth during childhood.

Authors:  F Schmidt; B Penka; M Trauner; L Reinsperger; G Ranner; F Ebner; F Waldhauser
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 5.958

6.  [Magnetic resonance study of the pineal region. Normal pineal gland and simple cysts].

Authors:  J G Caldas; D Doyon; H Lederman; R Carlier
Journal:  Arq Neuropsiquiatr       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 1.420

7.  The histological appearance of the human pineal gland from puberty to old age.

Authors:  E Tapp; M Huxley
Journal:  J Pathol       Date:  1972-10       Impact factor: 7.996

8.  MR imaging of pineal cysts.

Authors:  D H Lee; D Norman; T H Newton
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  1987 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.826

9.  [Prevalence and morphology of pineal cysts discovered at pituitary MRI: review of 1844 examinations].

Authors:  V Petitcolin; J M Garcier; R Mohammedi; A Ravel; R Mofid; J F Viallet; G Vanneuville; L Boyer
Journal:  J Radiol       Date:  2002-02

10.  Enhanced high-resolution sagittal MRI of normal pineal glands.

Authors:  Y Inoue; S Saiwai; T Miyamoto; J Katsuyama
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  1994 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.826

View more
  9 in total

1.  Microstructural analysis of pineal volume using trueFISP imaging.

Authors:  Jan M Bumb; Marc A Brockmann; Christoph Groden; Ingo Nolte
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2013-04-28

2.  Follow-up of pineal cysts in children: is it necessary?

Authors:  Miro-Pekka Jussila; Päivi Olsén; Niina Salokorpi; Maria Suo-Palosaari
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2017-09-23       Impact factor: 2.804

3.  The prevalence of pineal cyst in patients with cerebral palsy.

Authors:  Evrim Özmen; Betül Derinkuyu; Cesur Samancı; Havva Akmaz Ünlü; Tülin Hakan Demirkan; Zehra Işık Haşıloğlu; Sebuh Kuruoğlu; İbrahim Adaletli
Journal:  Diagn Interv Radiol       Date:  2015 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.630

4.  Incidental pineal cysts in children who undergo 3-T MRI.

Authors:  Matthew T Whitehead; Christopher C Oh; Asim F Choudhri
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2013-07-14

5.  Structural and Volumetric Brain MRI Findings in Mild Traumatic Brain Injury.

Authors:  J B Patel; S H Wilson; T R Oakes; P Santhanam; L K Weaver
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2020-01-02       Impact factor: 3.825

6.  Assessment of Pineal Gland Volume and Calcification in Healthy Subjects: Is it Related to Aging?

Authors:  Mehtap Beker-Acay; Ozan Turamanlar; Erdal Horata; Ebru Unlu; Nurdan Fidan; Serdar Oruc
Journal:  J Belg Soc Radiol       Date:  2016-02-01       Impact factor: 1.894

Review 7.  Pineal gland dysfunction in Alzheimer's disease: relationship with the immune-pineal axis, sleep disturbance, and neurogenesis.

Authors:  Juhyun Song
Journal:  Mol Neurodegener       Date:  2019-07-11       Impact factor: 14.195

8.  MRI-based assessment of the pineal gland in a large population of children aged 0-5 years and comparison with pineoblastoma: part I, the solid gland.

Authors:  Paolo Galluzzi; Marcus C de Jong; Selma Sirin; Philippe Maeder; Pietro Piu; Alfonso Cerase; Lucia Monti; Hervé J Brisse; Jonas A Castelijns; Pim de Graaf; Sophia L Goericke
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2016-04-29       Impact factor: 2.804

9.  MRI-based assessment of the pineal gland in a large population of children aged 0-5 years and comparison with pineoblastoma: part II, the cystic gland.

Authors:  Selma Sirin; Marcus C de Jong; Paolo Galluzzi; Philippe Maeder; Hervé J Brisse; Jonas A Castelijns; Pim de Graaf; Sophia L Goericke
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2016-04-29       Impact factor: 2.804

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.