BACKGROUND: Pineal cysts, both simple and complex, are commonly encountered in children. More cysts are being detected with MR technology; however, nearly all pineal cysts are benign and require no follow-up. OBJECTIVE: To discover the prevalence of pineal cysts in children at our institution who have undergone high-resolution 3-T MRI. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 100 consecutive 3-T brain MRIs in children ages 1 month to 17 years (mean 6.8 ± 5.1 years). We evaluated 3-D volumetric T1-W imaging, axial T2-W imaging, axial T2-W FLAIR (fluid attenuated inversion recovery) and coronal STIR (short tau inversion recovery) sequences. Pineal parenchymal and cyst volumes were measured in three planes. Cysts were analyzed for the presence and degree of complexity. RESULTS: Pineal cysts were present in 57% of children, with a mean maximum linear dimension of 4.2 mm (range 1.5-16 mm). Of these cysts, 24.6% showed thin septations or fluid levels reflecting complexity. None of the cysts demonstrated complete T2/FLAIR signal suppression. No cyst wall thickening or nodularity was present. There was no significant difference between the ages of children with and without cysts. Cysts were more commonly encountered in girls than boys (67% vs. 52%; P = 0.043). There was a slight trend toward increasing pineal gland volume with age. CONCLUSION: Pineal cysts are often present in children and can be incidentally detected by 3-T MRI. Characteristic-appearing pineal cysts in children are benign, incidental findings, for which follow-up is not required if there are no referable symptoms or excessive size.
BACKGROUND: Pineal cysts, both simple and complex, are commonly encountered in children. More cysts are being detected with MR technology; however, nearly all pineal cysts are benign and require no follow-up. OBJECTIVE: To discover the prevalence of pineal cysts in children at our institution who have undergone high-resolution 3-T MRI. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 100 consecutive 3-T brain MRIs in children ages 1 month to 17 years (mean 6.8 ± 5.1 years). We evaluated 3-D volumetric T1-W imaging, axial T2-W imaging, axial T2-W FLAIR (fluid attenuated inversion recovery) and coronal STIR (short tau inversion recovery) sequences. Pineal parenchymal and cyst volumes were measured in three planes. Cysts were analyzed for the presence and degree of complexity. RESULTS: Pineal cysts were present in 57% of children, with a mean maximum linear dimension of 4.2 mm (range 1.5-16 mm). Of these cysts, 24.6% showed thin septations or fluid levels reflecting complexity. None of the cysts demonstrated complete T2/FLAIR signal suppression. No cyst wall thickening or nodularity was present. There was no significant difference between the ages of children with and without cysts. Cysts were more commonly encountered in girls than boys (67% vs. 52%; P = 0.043). There was a slight trend toward increasing pineal gland volume with age. CONCLUSION: Pineal cysts are often present in children and can be incidentally detected by 3-T MRI. Characteristic-appearing pineal cysts in children are benign, incidental findings, for which follow-up is not required if there are no referable symptoms or excessive size.
Authors: E Kluczewska; A Giec-Lorenz; P Bazowski; M Mandera; J Baron; Z Zieliński Journal: Neurol Neurochir Pol Date: 1999 Sep-Oct Impact factor: 1.621
Authors: Y Pu; S Mahankali; J Hou; J Li; J L Lancaster; J-H Gao; D E Appelbaum; P T Fox Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2007-09-20 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Wajd N Al-Holou; Hugh J L Garton; Karin M Muraszko; Mohannad Ibrahim; Cormac O Maher Journal: J Neurosurg Pediatr Date: 2009-09 Impact factor: 2.375
Authors: Federico Bruno; Francesco Arrigoni; Nicola Maggialetti; Raffaele Natella; Alfonso Reginelli; Ernesto Di Cesare; Luca Brunese; Andrea Giovagnoni; Carlo Masciocchi; Alessandra Splendiani; Antonio Barile Journal: Gland Surg Date: 2019-04
Authors: Adolf Pfefferbaum; Torsten Rohlfing; Kilian M Pohl; Barton Lane; Weiwei Chu; Dongjin Kwon; B Nolan Nichols; Sandra A Brown; Susan F Tapert; Kevin Cummins; Wesley K Thompson; Ty Brumback; M J Meloy; Terry L Jernigan; Anders Dale; Ian M Colrain; Fiona C Baker; Devin Prouty; Michael D De Bellis; James T Voyvodic; Duncan B Clark; Beatriz Luna; Tammy Chung; Bonnie J Nagel; Edith V Sullivan Journal: Cereb Cortex Date: 2015-09-26 Impact factor: 5.357
Authors: V Dangouloff-Ros; C-J Roux; G Boulouis; R Levy; N Nicolas; C Lozach; D Grevent; F Brunelle; N Boddaert; O Naggara Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2019-10-17 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Selma Sirin; Marcus C de Jong; Paolo Galluzzi; Philippe Maeder; Hervé J Brisse; Jonas A Castelijns; Pim de Graaf; Sophia L Goericke Journal: Neuroradiology Date: 2016-04-29 Impact factor: 2.804