Literature DB >> 22099989

The FGFR3 mutation is related to favorable pT1 bladder cancer.

Bas W G van Rhijn1, Theo H van der Kwast, Liyang Liu, Neil E Fleshner, Peter J Bostrom, André N Vis, Sultan S Alkhateeb, Chris H Bangma, Michael A S Jewett, Ellen C Zwarthoff, Alexandre R Zlotta, Bharati Bapat.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Stage pT1 bladder cancer comprises a heterogeneous group of tumors for which different management options are advocated. FGFR3 mutations are linked to favorable (low grade/stage) pTa bladder cancer while altered P53 is common in cases of high grade, muscle invasive (pT2 or greater) bladder cancer. We determined the frequency of FGFR3 mutations and P53 alterations in patients with pT1 bladder cancer and correlated these data to histopathological variables and clinical outcomes.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We included 132 patients with primary pT1 bladder cancer from a total of 2 academic centers. A uropathologist reviewed the slides for grade and confirmed the pT1 diagnosis. FGFR3 mutation status was examined by SNaPshot® analysis and P53 expression was determined by standard immunohistochemistry. Kaplan-Meier and multivariate analyses were used to assess progression.
RESULTS: FGFR3 mutations were detected in 37 of 132 pT1 bladder cancer cases (28%) and altered P53 was seen in 71 (54%). Only 8% of patients had the 2 molecular alterations (p = 0.001). FGFR3 mutation correlated with lower grade and altered P53 correlated with high grade pT1 bladder cancer. Median followup was 6.5 years. FGFR3 mutation status and carcinoma in situ were significant for predicting progression on univariate and multivariate analyses but P53 status was not.
CONCLUSIONS: FGFR3 mutations selectively identify patients with pT1 bladder cancer who have favorable disease characteristics. Further study may confirm that FGFR3 identifies those who would benefit from a conservative approach to the disease.
Copyright © 2012 American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22099989     DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2011.09.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  38 in total

1.  [Personalized urooncology based on molecular uropathology: part 1: what is diagnostic routine?].

Authors:  C G Stöhr; R Stöhr; A Rogler; K Amann; R Knüchel-Clarke; A Hartmann
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 0.639

2.  Evaluation of FGFR3 as a Therapeutic Target in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

Authors:  Anne von Mässenhausen; Mario Deng; Hannah Billig; Angela Queisser; Wenzel Vogel; Glen Kristiansen; Andreas Schröck; Friedrich Bootz; Friederike Göke; Alina Franzen; Lynn Heasley; Jutta Kirfel; Johannes Brägelmann; Sven Perner
Journal:  Target Oncol       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 4.493

Review 3.  Toward personalized management in bladder cancer: the promise of novel molecular taxonomy.

Authors:  Marie-Lisa Eich; Lars Dyrskjøt; George J Netto
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2017-04-21       Impact factor: 4.064

Review 4.  The route to personalized medicine in bladder cancer: where do we stand?

Authors:  Francesco Massari; Chiara Ciccarese; Matteo Santoni; Matteo Brunelli; Alessandro Conti; Alessandra Modena; Rodolfo Montironi; Daniele Santini; Liang Cheng; Guido Martignoni; Stefano Cascinu; Giampaolo Tortora
Journal:  Target Oncol       Date:  2015-01-30       Impact factor: 4.493

Review 5.  Novel molecular targets for urothelial carcinoma.

Authors:  Bishoy M Faltas; Beerinder S Karir; Scott T Tagawa; Jonathan E Rosenberg
Journal:  Expert Opin Ther Targets       Date:  2015-01-30       Impact factor: 6.902

Review 6.  [Molecular classification of bladder cancer. Possible similarities to breast cancer].

Authors:  R M Wirtz; V Fritz; R Stöhr; A Hartmann
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 1.011

7.  Molecular investigation of FGFR3 gene mutation and its correlation with clinicopathological findings in Indian bladder cancer patients.

Authors:  Firoz Ahmad; Vishal Mahal; Geeta Verma; Simi Bhatia; Bibhu Ranjan Das
Journal:  Cancer Rep (Hoboken)       Date:  2018-09-17

Review 8.  DNA methylation-based biomarkers in bladder cancer.

Authors:  Raju Kandimalla; Angela A van Tilborg; Ellen C Zwarthoff
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2013-04-30       Impact factor: 14.432

9.  Expression levels of FGFR3 as a prognostic marker for the progression of primary pT1 bladder cancer and its association with mutation status.

Authors:  Ho Won Kang; Ye-Hwan Kim; Pildu Jeong; Cheol Park; Won Tae Kim; Dong Hee Ryu; Eun-Jong Cha; Yun-Sok Ha; Tae-Hwan Kim; Tae Gyun Kwon; Sung-Kwon Moon; Yung Hyun Choi; Seok-Joong Yun; Wun-Jae Kim
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2017-07-20       Impact factor: 2.967

10.  Prostaglandin receptors EP1-4 as a potential marker for clinical outcome in urothelial bladder cancer.

Authors:  Laura von der Emde; Diane Goltz; Stefan Latz; Stefan C Müller; Glen Kristiansen; Jörg Ellinger; Isabella Syring
Journal:  Am J Cancer Res       Date:  2014-11-19       Impact factor: 6.166

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.