Literature DB >> 28927152

Expression levels of FGFR3 as a prognostic marker for the progression of primary pT1 bladder cancer and its association with mutation status.

Ho Won Kang1, Ye-Hwan Kim1, Pildu Jeong1, Cheol Park1, Won Tae Kim1, Dong Hee Ryu2, Eun-Jong Cha3, Yun-Sok Ha4, Tae-Hwan Kim4, Tae Gyun Kwon4, Sung-Kwon Moon5, Yung Hyun Choi6, Seok-Joong Yun1, Wun-Jae Kim1.   

Abstract

The present study examined the utility of fibroblast growth factor receptor 3 (FGFR3) mutation status and gene expression as a prognostic marker in primary pT1 bladder cancer (BC). A total of 120 patients with primary pT1 BC were enrolled. FGFR3 mutation status was determined by direct sequencing and FGFR3 mRNA expression level was determined by reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) analysis. The results were compared with the clinicopathological parameters, and the prognostic value of FGFR3 was evaluated by Kaplan-Meier analysis and a multivariate Cox regression test. FGFR3 mutations were identified in 48/120 (40.0%) patients with pT1 BC. FGFR3 mRNA expression level was significantly higher in those with BC harboring FGFR3 mutations (P<0.001). Low FGFR3 expression level was associated with high-grade tumors and cancer progression (P=0.006 and P=0.001), whereas FGFR3 mutation status was not associated with cancer progression. Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed a similar result (log-rank, P<0.001). Multivariate analysis identified low FGFR3 expression level (odds ratio, 3.300; 95% confidence interval, 1.310-8.313; P=0.011) as an independent predictor of cancer progression. Stratification by exon site of FGFR3 mutations yielded significant differences in mRNA expression level. None of the patients with BC harboring FGFR3 mutations in exon 9 demonstrated disease progression. The mRNA expression level of the FGFR3 gene may be used to precisely identify subsets of patients with pT1 BC that have a relatively better prognosis. The prognostic influences of FGFR3 mutations may be modulated by the exon site of FGFR3 mutations.

Entities:  

Keywords:  bladder cancer; expression; fibroblast growth factor receptor 3; mutation; prognosis

Year:  2017        PMID: 28927152      PMCID: PMC5587943          DOI: 10.3892/ol.2017.6621

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oncol Lett        ISSN: 1792-1074            Impact factor:   2.967


  29 in total

1.  Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) Method.

Authors:  K J Livak; T D Schmittgen
Journal:  Methods       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 3.608

2.  Frequent FGFR3 mutations in papillary non-invasive bladder (pTa) tumors.

Authors:  C Billerey; D Chopin; M H Aubriot-Lorton; D Ricol; S Gil Diez de Medina; B Van Rhijn; M P Bralet; M A Lefrere-Belda; J B Lahaye; C C Abbou; J Bonaventure; E S Zafrani; T van der Kwast; J P Thiery; F Radvanyi
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 4.307

Review 3.  Molecular biology of bladder cancer: new insights into pathogenesis and clinical diversity.

Authors:  Margaret A Knowles; Carolyn D Hurst
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 60.716

4.  Mutations in FGFR3 and PIK3CA, singly or combined with RAS and AKT1, are associated with AKT but not with MAPK pathway activation in urothelial bladder cancer.

Authors:  Nuria Juanpere; Laia Agell; Marta Lorenzo; Silvia de Muga; Laura López-Vilaró; Raquel Murillo; Sergi Mojal; Sergio Serrano; José A Lorente; Josep Lloreta; Silvia Hernández
Journal:  Hum Pathol       Date:  2012-03-12       Impact factor: 3.466

5.  FGFR3 and Ras gene mutations are mutually exclusive genetic events in urothelial cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Adel H Jebar; Carolyn D Hurst; Darren C Tomlinson; Colin Johnston; Claire F Taylor; Margaret A Knowles
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2005-08-04       Impact factor: 9.867

Review 6.  Oncogenic role of fibroblast growth factor receptor 3 in tumorigenesis of urinary bladder cancer.

Authors:  Arshad A Pandith; Zafar A Shah; Mushtaq A Siddiqi
Journal:  Urol Oncol       Date:  2010-09-06       Impact factor: 3.498

7.  FGFR3 and Tp53 mutations in T1G3 transitional bladder carcinomas: independent distribution and lack of association with prognosis.

Authors:  Silvia Hernández; Elena López-Knowles; Josep Lloreta; Manolis Kogevinas; Roberto Jaramillo; Alex Amorós; Adonina Tardón; Reina García-Closas; Consol Serra; Alfredo Carrato; Núria Malats; Francisco X Real
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2005-08-01       Impact factor: 12.531

8.  Genetic alterations in bladder cancer.

Authors:  G Dalbagni; J Presti; V Reuter; W R Fair; C Cordon-Cardo
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1993-08-21       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  FGFR3 mutations, but not FGFR3 expression and FGFR3 copy-number variations, are associated with favourable non-muscle invasive bladder cancer.

Authors:  Yann Neuzillet; Bas W G van Rhijn; Nadia L Prigoda; Bharati Bapat; Liyang Liu; Peter J Bostrom; Neil E Fleshner; Brenda L Gallie; Alexandre R Zlotta; Michael A S Jewett; Theo H van der Kwast
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2014-06-01       Impact factor: 4.064

10.  FGFR3 protein expression and its relationship to mutation status and prognostic variables in bladder cancer.

Authors:  D C Tomlinson; O Baldo; P Harnden; M A Knowles
Journal:  J Pathol       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 7.996

View more
  9 in total

1.  The Prognostic Value of FGFR3 Expression in Patients with T1 Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer.

Authors:  Danijel Sikic; Helge Taubert; Johannes Breyer; Markus Eckstein; Veronika Weyerer; Bastian Keck; Jennifer Kubon; Wolfgang Otto; Thomas S Worst; Maximilian C Kriegmair; Philipp Erben; Arndt Hartmann; Bernd Wullich; Ralph M Wirtz; Sven Wach
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2021-08-20       Impact factor: 3.989

2.  Decreased expression of SRY-box containing gene 30 is related to malignant phenotypes of human bladder cancer and correlates with poor prognosis.

Authors:  Yang Liu; Han Wang; Jianhua Zhong; Chenglong Wu; Gang Yang; Yuantang Zhong; Jinghua Zhang; Aifa Tang
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2018-06-07       Impact factor: 4.430

3.  miR-24-3p/FGFR3 Signaling as a Novel Axis Is Involved in Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition and Regulates Lung Adenocarcinoma Progression.

Authors:  Pengyu Jing; Nan Zhao; Nianlin Xie; Mingxiang Ye; Yong Zhang; Zhipei Zhang; Mengyang Li; Xiaofeng Lai; Jian Zhang; Zhongping Gu
Journal:  J Immunol Res       Date:  2018-04-05       Impact factor: 4.818

Review 4.  FGFR3 Alterations in the Era of Immunotherapy for Urothelial Bladder Cancer.

Authors:  Alec Kacew; Randy F Sweis
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2020-11-05       Impact factor: 7.561

Review 5.  Patient Selection Approaches in FGFR Inhibitor Trials-Many Paths to the Same End?

Authors:  Peter Ellinghaus; Daniel Neureiter; Hendrik Nogai; Sebastian Stintzing; Matthias Ocker
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2022-10-10       Impact factor: 7.666

6.  FGFR1-4 RNA-Based Gene Alteration and Expression Analysis in Squamous Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

Authors:  Joanna Moes-Sosnowska; Monika Skupinska; Urszula Lechowicz; Ewa Szczepulska-Wojcik; Paulina Skronska; Adriana Rozy; Aneta Stepniewska; Renata Langfort; Piotr Rudzinski; Tadeusz Orlowski; Delfina Popiel; Aleksandra Stanczak; Maciej Wieczorek; Joanna Chorostowska-Wynimko
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-09-10       Impact factor: 6.208

Review 7.  Diagnostic and Prognostic Potential of Biomarkers CYFRA 21.1, ERCC1, p53, FGFR3 and TATI in Bladder Cancers.

Authors:  Milena Matuszczak; Maciej Salagierski
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-05-09       Impact factor: 5.923

8.  Connecting the dots between different networks: miRNAs associated with bladder cancer risk and progression.

Authors:  Cornelia Braicu; Rares Buiga; Roxana Cojocneanu; Mihail Buse; Lajos Raduly; Laura Ancuta Pop; Sergiu Chira; Liviuta Budisan; Ancuta Jurj; Cristina Ciocan; Lorand Magdo; Alexandru Irimie; Florentin Dobrota; Bogdan Petrut; Ioana Berindan-Neagoe
Journal:  J Exp Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2019-10-29

Review 9.  The therapeutic and prognostic implications of molecular biomarkers in urothelial carcinoma.

Authors:  Ho Won Kang; Wun-Jae Kim; Seok Joong Yun
Journal:  Transl Cancer Res       Date:  2020-10       Impact factor: 1.241

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.