Literature DB >> 22099388

Quality evaluation of microscopy and scanned histological images for diagnostic purposes.

R Redondo1, G Bueno, G Cristóbal, J Vidal, O Déniz, M García-Rojo, C Murillo, F Relea, J González.   

Abstract

In this work we present a study for assessing and comparing the fidelity of biopsy and cytology images captured with two different devices, that is optical microscopes and scanners, at 40× magnification in bright field. The devices use different ways to magnify images. Microscopes use a set of lenses while scanners capture light through arrays of micro-photoreceptors. The objective is to carry out a quantitative evaluation to discern which of the two devices provides better image quality in terms of contrast, colour and stain. Since there is no unanimous consensus on quality metrics, we will make use of both an objective metric based on perceptual features, together with a subjective psychophysical test as the International Telecommunications Union (ITU) recommends in ITU-R BT.500 for such type of tests. Both techniques indicate a slight preference for the scanner over the microscope in terms of better image quality, considering defocus as the main problem followed by colour distortions. However, the image quality of both devices is suitable for clinical, educational and research purposes.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22099388     DOI: 10.1016/j.micron.2011.09.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Micron        ISSN: 0968-4328            Impact factor:   2.251


  7 in total

1.  The influence of the microscope lamp filament colour temperature on the process of digital images of histological slides acquisition standardization.

Authors:  Anna Korzynska; Lukasz Roszkowiak; Dorota Pijanowska; Wojciech Kozlowski; Tomasz Markiewicz
Journal:  Diagn Pathol       Date:  2014-12-19       Impact factor: 2.644

2.  Evaluation of whole slide imaging for routine surgical pathology: Looking through a broader scope.

Authors:  Walter H Henricks
Journal:  J Pathol Inform       Date:  2012-10-31

3.  Comment on "Quality evaluation of microscopy and scanned histological images for diagnostic purposes": Are scanners better than microscopes?

Authors:  Yukako Yagi; Liron Pantanowitz
Journal:  J Pathol Inform       Date:  2012-04-18

Review 4.  "Slide less pathology": Fairy tale or reality?

Authors:  M Indu; R Rathy; M P Binu
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Pathol       Date:  2016 May-Aug

5.  PATMA: parser of archival tissue microarray.

Authors:  Lukasz Roszkowiak; Carlos Lopez
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2016-12-01       Impact factor: 2.984

6.  A Study on Image Quality in Polarization-Resolved Second Harmonic Generation Microscopy.

Authors:  Stefan G Stanciu; Francisco J Ávila; Radu Hristu; Juan M Bueno
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-11-13       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Image Quality Ranking Method for Microscopy.

Authors:  Sami Koho; Elnaz Fazeli; John E Eriksson; Pekka E Hänninen
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-07-01       Impact factor: 4.379

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.