PURPOSE: To evaluate the applicability of arterial spin labeling (ASL) cerebral blood flow (CBF) measurements in children with sickle cell disease (SCD). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We included 12 patients and five controls. Conventional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) (T2, fluid attenuated inversion recovery [FLAIR], and MR angiography) was performed to diagnose silent infarcts, vasculopathy, or leukoencephalopathy. Pseudo-continuous ASL was performed to measure CBF using two postlabeling delays to identify transit-time effects. Perfusion estimates were corrected for hematocrit and blood velocity in the labeling plane and compared to phase-contrast MR. CBF asymmetries between the flow maps of the left and right internal carotid arteries were tested for significance using paired t-tests. Significant asymmetries were expressed in terms of an asymmetry ratio (AR = absolute difference/mean). An AR >10% was considered clinically relevant. RESULTS: Mean CBF was higher in patients than in controls. Agreement between CBF and flow improved after applying hematocrit and velocity corrections. At a 2100 msec postlabeling delay one patient had a clinically relevant asymmetry. No association was observed between CBF asymmetries and silent infarcts. CONCLUSION: Care must be taken in the interpretation of ASL-CBF measurements in SCD patients. A long postlabeling delay with blood velocity correction anticipates overestimation of CBF asymmetries.
PURPOSE: To evaluate the applicability of arterial spin labeling (ASL) cerebral blood flow (CBF) measurements in children with sickle cell disease (SCD). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We included 12 patients and five controls. Conventional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) (T2, fluid attenuated inversion recovery [FLAIR], and MR angiography) was performed to diagnose silent infarcts, vasculopathy, or leukoencephalopathy. Pseudo-continuous ASL was performed to measure CBF using two postlabeling delays to identify transit-time effects. Perfusion estimates were corrected for hematocrit and blood velocity in the labeling plane and compared to phase-contrast MR. CBF asymmetries between the flow maps of the left and right internal carotid arteries were tested for significance using paired t-tests. Significant asymmetries were expressed in terms of an asymmetry ratio (AR = absolute difference/mean). An AR >10% was considered clinically relevant. RESULTS: Mean CBF was higher in patients than in controls. Agreement between CBF and flow improved after applying hematocrit and velocity corrections. At a 2100 msec postlabeling delay one patient had a clinically relevant asymmetry. No association was observed between CBF asymmetries and silent infarcts. CONCLUSION: Care must be taken in the interpretation of ASL-CBF measurements in SCDpatients. A long postlabeling delay with blood velocity correction anticipates overestimation of CBF asymmetries.
Authors: Jurriaan J H Barkeij Wolf; Jessica C Foster-Dingley; Justine E F Moonen; Matthias J P van Osch; Anton J M de Craen; Wouter de Ruijter; Roos C van der Mast; Jeroen van der Grond Journal: J Cereb Blood Flow Metab Date: 2016-01-11 Impact factor: 6.200
Authors: Lindsay S Cahill; Lisa M Gazdzinski; Albert Ky Tsui; Yu-Qing Zhou; Sharon Portnoy; Elaine Liu; C David Mazer; Gregory Mt Hare; Andrea Kassner; John G Sled Journal: J Cereb Blood Flow Metab Date: 2016-07-20 Impact factor: 6.200
Authors: Seung Yup Lee; Kyle R Cowdrick; Bharat Sanders; Eashani Sathialingam; Courtney E McCracken; Wilbur A Lam; Clinton H Joiner; Erin M Buckley Journal: Neurophotonics Date: 2019-08-19 Impact factor: 3.593
Authors: Kristin P Guilliams; Melanie E Fields; Dustin K Ragan; Cihat Eldeniz; Michael M Binkley; Yasheng Chen; Liam S Comiskey; Allan Doctor; Monica L Hulbert; Joshua S Shimony; Katie D Vo; Robert C McKinstry; Hongyu An; Jin-Moo Lee; Andria L Ford Journal: Blood Date: 2017-12-18 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: Adam Bush; Yaqiong Chai; So Young Choi; Lena Vaclavu; Scott Holland; Aart Nederveen; Thomas Coates; John Wood Journal: Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2017-12-09 Impact factor: 2.546
Authors: Kathleen J Helton; John O Glass; Wilburn E Reddick; Amir Paydar; Arash R Zandieh; Rachna Dave; Matthew P Smeltzer; Song Wu; Jane Hankins; Banu Aygun; Robert J Ogg Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2014-01-08 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Adam M Bush; Matthew T Borzage; Soyoung Choi; Lena Václavů; Benita Tamrazi; Aart J Nederveen; Thomas D Coates; John C Wood Journal: Am J Hematol Date: 2016-07-04 Impact factor: 10.047