PURPOSE: Elevated cerebral blood flow (CBF) in sickle cell anemia (SCA) is an adaptive pathophysiologic response associated with decreased vascular reserve and increased risk for ischemia. We compared manual (M) and semiautomated (SA) vascular territory delineation to facilitate standardized evaluation of CBF in children with SCA. MATERIALS AND METHODS: ASL perfusion values from 21 children were compared for gray matter and white matter (WM) in vascular territories defined by M and SA delineation. SA delineated CBF was compared with clinical and hematologic variables acquired within 4 weeks of the MRI. RESULTS: CBF measurements from M (MCA 82 left, 79 right) and SA (MCA 81 left, 81 right) delineated territories were highly correlated (R = 0.99, P < 0.0001). Bland-Altman plots had close-fitting limits of agreement of -1.8 to -3.5 lower limit and 0 to 1.8 upper limit. SA vascular territory delineation was comparable to the expert delineation with a kappa index of 0.62-0.85 and was considerably faster. Median territorial CBF values did not differ by gender or age. WM perfusion in the posterior cerebral artery territories was positively correlated with degree of hemolysis (R = 0.58, P = 0.01 left, 0.73, P < 0.001 right) and negatively correlated with hemoglobin (R = -0.48; P = 0.03 left; -0.47; P = 0.04 right) and hemoglobin F (R = -0.42; P = .09 left; -0.47; P = 0.049 right). CONCLUSION: We established the validity of the SA method, which in our experience was much faster than the M method for delineation of vascular territories. Associations between CBF and hematologic variables may demonstrate pathophysiologic changes that contribute to clinical variation in CBF.
PURPOSE: Elevated cerebral blood flow (CBF) in sickle cell anemia (SCA) is an adaptive pathophysiologic response associated with decreased vascular reserve and increased risk for ischemia. We compared manual (M) and semiautomated (SA) vascular territory delineation to facilitate standardized evaluation of CBF in children with SCA. MATERIALS AND METHODS:ASL perfusion values from 21 children were compared for gray matter and white matter (WM) in vascular territories defined by M and SA delineation. SA delineated CBF was compared with clinical and hematologic variables acquired within 4 weeks of the MRI. RESULTS: CBF measurements from M (MCA 82 left, 79 right) and SA (MCA 81 left, 81 right) delineated territories were highly correlated (R = 0.99, P < 0.0001). Bland-Altman plots had close-fitting limits of agreement of -1.8 to -3.5 lower limit and 0 to 1.8 upper limit. SA vascular territory delineation was comparable to the expert delineation with a kappa index of 0.62-0.85 and was considerably faster. Median territorial CBF values did not differ by gender or age. WM perfusion in the posterior cerebral artery territories was positively correlated with degree of hemolysis (R = 0.58, P = 0.01 left, 0.73, P < 0.001 right) and negatively correlated with hemoglobin (R = -0.48; P = 0.03 left; -0.47; P = 0.04 right) and hemoglobin F (R = -0.42; P = .09 left; -0.47; P = 0.049 right). CONCLUSION: We established the validity of the SA method, which in our experience was much faster than the M method for delineation of vascular territories. Associations between CBF and hematologic variables may demonstrate pathophysiologic changes that contribute to clinical variation in CBF.
Authors: Thomas F Floyd; Sarah J Ratcliffe; Jiongjiong Wang; Brooke Resch; John A Detre Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2003-12 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Jiongjiong Wang; Daniel J Licht; Geon-Ho Jahng; Chia-Shang Liu; Joan T Rubin; John Haselgrove; Robert A Zimmerman; John A Detre Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2003-10 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: D R Powars; P S Conti; W Y Wong; P Groncy; C Hyman; E Smith; N Ewing; R N Keenan; C S Zee; Y Harold; A L Hiti; E L Teng; L S Chan Journal: Blood Date: 1999-01-01 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: Elliott P Vichinsky; Lynne D Neumayr; Jeffrey I Gold; Michael W Weiner; Randall R Rule; Diana Truran; Jeffrey Kasten; Barry Eggleston; Karen Kesler; Lillian McMahon; Eugene P Orringer; Thomas Harrington; Karen Kalinyak; Laura M De Castro; Abdullah Kutlar; Cynthia J Rutherford; Cage Johnson; Joel David Bessman; Lanetta B Jordan; F Daniel Armstrong Journal: JAMA Date: 2010-05-12 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Sanna Gevers; Aart J Nederveen; Karin Fijnvandraat; Sandra M van den Berg; Pim van Ooij; Dennis F Heijtel; Harriët Heijboer; Paul J Nederkoorn; Marc Engelen; Matthias J van Osch; Charles B Majoie Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2011-11-16 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Isak Prohovnik; Anne Hurlet-Jensen; Robert Adams; Darryl De Vivo; Steven G Pavlakis Journal: J Cereb Blood Flow Metab Date: 2009-02-11 Impact factor: 6.200
Authors: Nancy S Green; Monica Bhatia; Erica Y Griffith; Mahvish Qureshi; Courtney Briamonte; Mirko Savone; Stephen Sands; Margaret T Lee; Angela Lignelli; Adam M Brickman Journal: Biol Blood Marrow Transplant Date: 2017-01-09 Impact factor: 5.742
Authors: Meher R Juttukonda; Lori C Jordan; Melissa C Gindville; Larry T Davis; Jennifer M Watchmaker; Sumit Pruthi; Manus J Donahue Journal: NMR Biomed Date: 2017-01-04 Impact factor: 4.044