Literature DB >> 29031532

Neuroimaging of vascular reserve in patients with cerebrovascular diseases.

Meher R Juttukonda1, Manus J Donahue2.   

Abstract

Cerebrovascular reactivity, defined broadly as the ability of brain parenchyma to adjust cerebral blood flow in response to altered metabolic demand or a vasoactive stimulus, is being measured with increasing frequency and may have a use for portending new or recurrent stroke risk in patients with cerebrovascular disease. The purpose of this review is to outline (i) the physiological basis of variations in cerebrovascular reactivity, (ii) available approaches for measuring cerebrovascular reactivity in research and clinical settings, and (iii) clinically-relevant cerebrovascular reactivity findings in the context of patients with cerebrovascular disease, including atherosclerotic arterial steno-occlusion, non-atherosclerotic arterial steno-occlusion, anemia, and aging. Literature references summarizing safety considerations for these procedures and future directions for standardizing protocols and post-processing procedures across centers are presented in the specific context of major unmet needs in the setting of cerebrovascular disease.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cerebral blood flow; Cerebrovascular reactivity; Hemodynamics; Hypercapnia; Ischemia; Stroke

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29031532      PMCID: PMC5897191          DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.10.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  153 in total

Review 1.  Utility of transcranial Doppler ultrasound for the integrative assessment of cerebrovascular function.

Authors:  C K Willie; F L Colino; D M Bailey; Y C Tzeng; G Binsted; L W Jones; M J Haykowsky; J Bellapart; S Ogoh; K J Smith; J D Smirl; T A Day; S J Lucas; L K Eller; P N Ainslie
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2011-01-27       Impact factor: 2.390

2.  Bolus arrival time and cerebral blood flow responses to hypercarbia.

Authors:  Manus J Donahue; Carlos C Faraco; Megan K Strother; Michael A Chappell; Swati Rane; Lindsey M Dethrage; Jeroen Hendrikse; Jeroen C W Siero
Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab       Date:  2014-04-30       Impact factor: 6.200

Review 3.  Cerebral hemodynamic impairment: methods of measurement and association with stroke risk.

Authors:  C P Derdeyn; R L Grubb; W J Powers
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  1999-07-22       Impact factor: 9.910

4.  Assessment of Hemodynamic Compromise Using Computed Tomography Perfusion in Combination with 123I-IMP Single-Photon Emission Computed Tomography without Acetazolamide Challenge Test.

Authors:  Atsumu Hashimoto; Takeshi Mikami; Katsuya Komatsu; Shouhei Noshiro; Tohru Hirano; Masahiko Wanibuchi; Nobuhiro Mikuni
Journal:  J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis       Date:  2016-12-06       Impact factor: 2.136

5.  Outcome of carotid artery occlusion is predicted by cerebrovascular reactivity.

Authors:  F Vernieri; P Pasqualetti; F Passarelli; P M Rossini; M Silvestrini
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 7.914

6.  Reduced cerebrovascular reserve is regionally associated with cortical thickness reductions in children with sickle cell disease.

Authors:  Junseok A Kim; Jackie Leung; Jason P Lerch; Andrea Kassner
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2016-03-26       Impact factor: 3.252

7.  Hemodynamic evaluation of basilar and vertebral artery angioplasty.

Authors:  Kern H Guppy; Fady T Charbel; Luke A Corsten; Meide Zhao; Gerard Debrun
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 4.654

8.  Investigating the non-linearity of the BOLD cerebrovascular reactivity response to targeted hypo/hypercapnia at 7T.

Authors:  Alex A Bhogal; Jeroen C W Siero; Joseph A Fisher; Martijn Froeling; Peter Luijten; Marielle Philippens; Hans Hoogduin
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2014-05-12       Impact factor: 6.556

9.  Dynamic forcing of end-tidal carbon dioxide and oxygen applied to functional magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Richard G Wise; Kyle T S Pattinson; Daniel P Bulte; Peter A Chiarelli; Stephen D Mayhew; George M Balanos; David F O'Connor; Timothy R Pragnell; Peter A Robbins; Irene Tracey; Peter Jezzard
Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab       Date:  2007-04-04       Impact factor: 6.200

10.  Cerebral blood flow quantification using vessel-encoded arterial spin labeling.

Authors:  Thomas W Okell; Michael A Chappell; Michael E Kelly; Peter Jezzard
Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab       Date:  2013-08-07       Impact factor: 6.200

View more
  17 in total

1.  Cerebral blood flow territory instability in patients with atherosclerotic intracranial stenosis.

Authors:  Daniel F Arteaga; Megan K Strother; Carlos C Faraco; L Taylor Davis; Allison O Scott; Manus J Donahue
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2019-04-02       Impact factor: 4.813

2.  A cross-sectional, case-control study of intracranial arterial wall thickness and complete blood count measures in sickle cell disease.

Authors:  Shuai Yuan; Lori C Jordan; Larry T Davis; Petrice M Cogswell; Chelsea A Lee; Niral J Patel; Spencer L Waddle; Meher Juttukonda; R Sky Jones; Allison Griffin; Manus J Donahue
Journal:  Br J Haematol       Date:  2020-12-16       Impact factor: 6.998

3.  Association of cerebrovascular reactivity and Alzheimer pathologic markers with cognitive performance.

Authors:  Sandeepa Sur; Zixuan Lin; Yang Li; Sevil Yasar; Paul Rosenberg; Abhay Moghekar; Xirui Hou; Rita Kalyani; Kaisha Hazel; George Pottanat; Cuimei Xu; Peter van Zijl; Jay Pillai; Peiying Liu; Marilyn Albert; Hanzhang Lu
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2020-07-13       Impact factor: 9.910

4.  Reproducibility of cerebrovascular reactivity measurements: A systematic review of neuroimaging techniques.

Authors:  Moss Y Zhao; Amanda Woodward; Audrey P Fan; Kevin T Chen; Yannan Yu; David Y Chen; Michael E Moseley; Greg Zaharchuk
Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab       Date:  2021-11-22       Impact factor: 6.960

5.  Relationships Between Regional Cerebral Blood Flow and Neurocognitive Outcomes in Children and Adolescents With Congenital Heart Disease.

Authors:  Vincent J Schmithorst; Daryaneh Badaly; Sue R Beers; Vincent K Lee; Jacqueline Weinberg; Cecilia W Lo; Ashok Panigrahy
Journal:  Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2021-11-10

Review 6.  Cerebral oxygen extraction fraction MRI: Techniques and applications.

Authors:  Dengrong Jiang; Hanzhang Lu
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2022-05-05       Impact factor: 3.737

7.  Impaired endothelium-mediated cerebrovascular reactivity promotes anxiety and respiration disorders in mice.

Authors:  Jan Wenzel; Cathrin E Hansen; Carla Bettoni; Miriam A Vogt; Beate Lembrich; Rentsenkhand Natsagdorj; Gianna Huber; Josefine Brands; Kjestine Schmidt; Julian C Assmann; Ines Stölting; Kathrin Saar; Jan Sedlacik; Jens Fiehler; Peter Ludewig; Michael Wegmann; Nina Feller; Marius Richter; Helge Müller-Fielitz; Thomas Walther; Gabriele M König; Evi Kostenis; Walter Raasch; Norbert Hübner; Peter Gass; Stefan Offermanns; Cor de Wit; Carsten A Wagner; Markus Schwaninger
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-01-02       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Choroid plexus perfusion in sickle cell disease and moyamoya vasculopathy: Implications for glymphatic flow.

Authors:  Skylar E Johnson; Colin D McKnight; Lori C Jordan; Daniel O Claassen; Spencer Waddle; Chelsea Lee; Maria Garza; Niral J Patel; L Taylor Davis; Sumit Pruthi; Paula Trujillo; Rohan Chitale; Matthew Fusco; Manus J Donahue
Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab       Date:  2021-04-28       Impact factor: 6.200

Review 9.  Cerebral Hypoxia: Its Role in Age-Related Chronic and Acute Cognitive Dysfunction.

Authors:  Brina Snyder; Stephanie M Simone; Tania Giovannetti; Thomas F Floyd
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2021-06-01       Impact factor: 6.627

10.  A Prospective, Longitudinal Magnetic Resonance Imaging Evaluation of Cerebrovascular Reactivity and Infarct Development in Patients With Intracranial Stenosis.

Authors:  Meher R Juttukonda; Larry T Davis; Sarah K Lants; Spencer L Waddle; Chelsea A Lee; Niral J Patel; Lori C Jordan; Manus J Donahue
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2021-03-24       Impact factor: 5.119

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.