Literature DB >> 16839707

Parotid-sparing intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) for nasopharyngeal carcinoma: preserved parotid function after IMRT on quantitative salivary scintigraphy, and comparison with historical data after conventional radiotherapy.

Ching-Yeh Hsiung1, Hui-Min Ting, Hsuan-Ying Huang, Chiang-Hsuan Lee, Eng-Yen Huang, Hsuan-Chih Hsu.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the parotid function after parotid-sparing intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). METHODS AND MATERIALS: From March 2003 to May 2004, 16 patients with nonmetastatic NPC underwent parotid-sparing IMRT. Eight of these patients had Stage III or IV NPC based on the 1997 American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system. The post-IMRT parotid function was evaluated by quantitative salivary scintigraphy and represented by the maximal excretion ratio (MER) of the parotid gland after sialogogue stimulation. The parotid function of 16 NPC patients who were previously treated with conventional radiotherapy was reviewed as the historical control.
RESULTS: In the parotid-sparing IMRT group, all 16 patients were alive and without cancer at the end of follow-up period (median, 24.2 months). The mean parotid MER was 53.5% before radiotherapy, 10.7% at 1 month post-IMRT, and 23.3% at 9 months post-IMRT. In the conventional radiotherapy group, the mean parotid MER was 0.6% at 6 to 12 months postradiotherapy. The difference was statistically significant (23.3% vs. 0.6%, p<0.001, Mann-Whitney test). In the IMRT group, the mean parotid doses ranged from 33.2 Gy to 58.8 Gy (average, 43.9 Gy). The correlation between the mean parotid dose and the percentage decrease of parotid MER at 9 months post-IMRT (dMER) was statically significant (p=0.008, Pearson correlation).
CONCLUSIONS: Although the mean parotid doses are relatively high, the significant preservation of parotid function is achieved with IMRT for NPC patients. The significant correlation between mean parotid dose and parotid dMER demonstrates the dose-function relationship of the parotid gland.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16839707     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2006.04.033

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  22 in total

1.  Prognostic value of quality of life measured after treatment on subsequent survival in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

Authors:  Wen-Ling Tsai; Chih-Yen Chien; Hsuan-Ying Huang; Kuan-Cho Liao; Fu-Min Fang
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2012-06-06       Impact factor: 4.147

2.  A benchmark study on 883 nasopharyngeal cancer patients treated in two Italian centres from 1977 to 2000. Part II: Evolving technical choices and toxicity patterns.

Authors:  S M Magrini; S Tonoli; L Costa; N Pasinetti; F Paiar; L Livi; G Simontacchi; I Meattini; L Pegurri; P Borghetti; P Frata; P Ponticelli; M Buglione; G Biti
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2011-11-17       Impact factor: 3.469

3.  Investigations on parotid gland recovery after IMRT in head and neck tumor patients.

Authors:  Markus Stock; Wolfgang Dörr; Carmen Stromberger; Ulrike Mock; Susanne Koizar; Richard Pötter; Dietmar Georg
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2010-11-30       Impact factor: 3.621

Review 4.  A systematic review of salivary gland hypofunction and xerostomia induced by cancer therapies: management strategies and economic impact.

Authors:  S B Jensen; A M L Pedersen; A Vissink; E Andersen; C G Brown; A N Davies; J Dutilh; J S Fulton; L Jankovic; N N F Lopes; A L S Mello; L V Muniz; C A Murdoch-Kinch; R G Nair; J J Napeñas; A Nogueira-Rodrigues; D Saunders; B Stirling; I von Bültzingslöwen; D S Weikel; L S Elting; F K L Spijkervet; M T Brennan
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2010-03-25       Impact factor: 3.603

5.  Intensity-modulated radiation therapy for orbital lymphoma.

Authors:  Sharad Goyal; Alan Cohler; Jayne Camporeale; Venkat Narra; Ning J Yue
Journal:  Radiat Med       Date:  2009-01-08

6.  Superficial parotid lobe-sparing delineation approach: a better method of dose optimization to protect the parotid gland in intensity-modulated radiotherapy for nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

Authors:  H B Zhang; X Lu; S M Huang; L Wang; C Zhao; W X Xia; S W Li; F L Wang; Y L Zhu; X Guo; Y Q Xiang
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 3.677

7.  Improving target dose coverage and organ-at-risk sparing in intensity-modulated radiotherapy of advanced laryngeal cancer by a simple optimization technique.

Authors:  J-Y Lu; L-L Wu; J-Y Zhang; J Zheng; M L-M Cheung; C-C Ma; L-X Xie; B-T Huang
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2014-12-12       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 8.  Interobserver variation in parotid gland delineation: a study of its impact on intensity-modulated radiotherapy solutions with a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  S W Loo; W M C Martin; P Smith; S Cherian; T W Roques
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 3.039

9.  Sparing level Ib lymph nodes by intensity-modulated radiotherapy in the treatment of nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

Authors:  Jing Chen; Dan Ou; Xiayun He; Chaosu Hu
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-12-12       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 10.  A systematic review of salivary gland hypofunction and xerostomia induced by cancer therapies: prevalence, severity and impact on quality of life.

Authors:  S B Jensen; A M L Pedersen; A Vissink; E Andersen; C G Brown; A N Davies; J Dutilh; J S Fulton; L Jankovic; N N F Lopes; A L S Mello; L V Muniz; C A Murdoch-Kinch; R G Nair; J J Napeñas; A Nogueira-Rodrigues; D Saunders; B Stirling; I von Bültzingslöwen; D S Weikel; L S Elting; F K L Spijkervet; M T Brennan
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2010-03-17       Impact factor: 3.603

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.