Literature DB >> 30828890

Reliability of the Bates-Jensen wound assessment tool for pressure injury assessment: The pressure ulcer detection study.

Barbara M Bates-Jensen1,2, Heather E McCreath2, Deniz Harputlu3, Anabel Patlan1,2.   

Abstract

The Bates-Jensen Wound Assessment Tool (BWAT) is used to assess wound healing in clinical practice. The purpose of this study was to evaluate BWAT use among nursing home residents with pressure injury. Findings and reliability estimates from the BWAT related to pressure injury characteristics (stage, anatomic location) and natural history (resolved, persisted) among 142 ethnically and racially diverse residents are reported. In this prospective 16-week study, 305 pressure injuries among 142 participants (34% prevalence) are described by stage, anatomic location, and BWAT scores. Visual and subepidermal moisture assessments were obtained from sacrum, buttock, ischial, and heel ulcers weekly. Participants were 14% Asian, 28% Black, 18% Hispanic, 40% White with a mean age of 78 ± 14 years, and were 62% female; 80% functionally dependent (bed mobility extensive/total assistance) and at risk (Braden Scale score 14 ± 2.7). The reliability coefficient for BWAT score (all participants, all anatomic locations) was high (r = 0.90; p < 0.0001; n = 1,161 observations). Weighted Kappas for characteristics ranging from 0.46 (skin color surrounding wound) to 0.79 (undermining) were consistent for all participants. BWAT scores showed strongest agreement coefficients for stage 4 pressure injury (r = 0.69), pressure injuries among Asian and White ethnicity/racial groups (r = 0.89, and r = 0.91, respectively), and sacrum anatomic location (r = 0.92) indicating scores are better correlated to fair skin tones. Lower agreement coefficients were demonstrated for stage 2 pressure injury (r = 0.38) and pressure injuries among African American and Hispanic ethnicity/racial groups (r = 0.88 and 0.87, respectively). BWAT scores were significantly different by pressure injury stage (F = 496.7, df = 6, p < 0.001) and anatomic location (F = 33.76, df = 8, p < 0.001). BWAT score correlated with pressure injury natural history (ulcer resolved 18.4 ± 7.4, ulcer persisted 24.9 ± 10.0; F = 70.11, df = 2, p < 0.001), but not with comorbidities. The BWAT provides reliable, objective data for assessing pressure injury healing progress.
© 2019 by the Wound Healing Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30828890      PMCID: PMC6693585          DOI: 10.1111/wrr.12714

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Wound Repair Regen        ISSN: 1067-1927            Impact factor:   3.617


  44 in total

1.  Validity and reliability of the Pressure Sore Status Tool.

Authors:  B M Bates-Jensen; D L Vredevoe; M L Brecht
Journal:  Decubitus       Date:  1992-11

2.  A prospective study of pressure sore risk among institutionalized elderly.

Authors:  N Bergstrom; B Braden
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 5.562

3.  The heel: anatomy, blood supply, and the pathophysiology of pressure ulcers.

Authors:  Adam Cichowitz; Wei Ren Pan; Mark Ashton
Journal:  Ann Plast Surg       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 1.539

Review 4.  Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability.

Authors:  P E Shrout; J L Fleiss
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1979-03       Impact factor: 17.737

5.  Pressure ulcer prevention in black and white nursing home residents: A QI initiative of enhanced ability, incentives, and management feedback.

Authors:  Jules Rosen; Vikas Mittal; Howard Degenholtz; Nick Castle; Benoit H Mulsant; David Nace; Fred H Rubin
Journal:  Adv Skin Wound Care       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 2.347

6.  Bates-Jensen wound assessment tool: pictorial guide validation project.

Authors:  Connie Harris; Barbara Bates-Jensen; Nancy Parslow; Rose Raizman; Mina Singh; Robert Ketchen
Journal:  J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs       Date:  2010 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.741

7.  Photographic assessment of the appearance of chronic pressure and leg ulcers.

Authors:  P E Houghton; C B Kincaid; K E Campbell; M G Woodbury; D H Keast
Journal:  Ostomy Wound Manage       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 2.629

8.  Human skin wounds: a major and snowballing threat to public health and the economy.

Authors:  Chandan K Sen; Gayle M Gordillo; Sashwati Roy; Robert Kirsner; Lynn Lambert; Thomas K Hunt; Finn Gottrup; Geoffrey C Gurtner; Michael T Longaker
Journal:  Wound Repair Regen       Date:  2009 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.617

9.  A prospective study evaluating the Pressure Ulcer Scale for Healing (PUSH Tool) to assess stage II, stage III, and stage IV pressure ulcers.

Authors:  Ulkü Yapucu Günes
Journal:  Ostomy Wound Manage       Date:  2009-05-01       Impact factor: 2.629

10.  Cost-effectiveness of negative pressure wound therapy for postsurgical patients in long-term acute care.

Authors:  Jean M de Leon; Sunni Barnes; Melody Nagel; Michelle Fudge; Adora Lucius; Betty Garcia
Journal:  Adv Skin Wound Care       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 2.347

View more
  3 in total

1.  The shifting care and outcomes for patients with endangered limbs - Critical limb ischemia (SCOPE-CLI) registry overview of study design and rationale.

Authors:  Lindsey E Scierka; Carlos Mena-Hurtado; Mehdi H Shishehbor; John A Spertus; Sameer Nagpal; Trissa Babrowski; Matthew C Bunte; Amani Politano; Misty Humphries; Jayer Chung; Lee Kirksey; Olamide Alabi; Peter Soukas; Sahil Parikh; Rumi Faizer; Robert Fitridge; Jeremy Provance; Gaëlle Romain; Neil McMillan; Nancy Stone; Kate Scott; Christine Fuss; Christina M Pacheco; Kensey Gosch; Avis Harper-Brooks; Kim G Smolderen
Journal:  Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc       Date:  2022-02-12

2.  Pressure Injuries and Management after Spinal Cord Injury.

Authors:  Nicole M Vecin; David R Gater
Journal:  J Pers Med       Date:  2022-07-12

3.  Comparison of Topical Oxygen with Vacuum Assisted Closure in Wound Healing in a Low Resource Setting.

Authors:  Tariq Akhtar Ansari; Sitanshu Barik; Pradeep Meena; Shobha Arora
Journal:  Ethiop J Health Sci       Date:  2022-09
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.