Literature DB >> 22091146

3-Ethyl-4-methyl-1H-pyrazol-2-ium-5-olate.

R S Rathore, T Narasimhamurthy, R Venkat Ragavan, V Vijayakumar, S Sarveswari.   

Abstract

The title compound, C(6)H(10)N(2)O, is a zwitterionic pyrazole derivative. The crystal packing is predominantly governed by a three-center iminium-amine N(+)-H⋯O(-)⋯H-N inter-action, leading to an undulating sheet-like structure lying parallel to (100).

Entities:  

Year:  2011        PMID: 22091146      PMCID: PMC3213569          DOI: 10.1107/S160053681102808X

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online        ISSN: 1600-5368


Related literature

For related structures and the preparation of similar compounds, see: Ragavan et al. (2009 ▶, 2010 ▶) and references therein. For related salt-bridge-mediated sheet structures, see: Shylaja et al. (2008 ▶).

Experimental

Crystal data

C6H10N2O M = 126.16 Monoclinic, a = 9.1299 (15) Å b = 7.1600 (11) Å c = 11.374 (2) Å β = 113.232 (9)° V = 683.2 (2) Å3 Z = 4 Mo Kα radiation μ = 0.09 mm−1 T = 296 K 0.21 × 0.19 × 0.11 mm

Data collection

Bruker APEXII CCD diffractometer Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Bruker, 2001 ▶) T min = 0.64, T max = 0.83 12120 measured reflections 1332 independent reflections 961 reflections with I > 2σ(I) R int = 0.034

Refinement

R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)] = 0.049 wR(F 2) = 0.136 S = 1.03 1332 reflections 92 parameters H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement Δρmax = 0.17 e Å−3 Δρmin = −0.21 e Å−3 Data collection: APEX2 (Bruker, 2007 ▶); cell refinement: SAINT-Plus (Bruker, 2007 ▶); data reduction: SAINT-Plus; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); molecular graphics: ORTEP-3 (Farrugia, 1997 ▶) and PLATON (Spek, 2009 ▶); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXL97 and PLATON (Spek, 2009 ▶). Crystal structure: contains datablock(s) global, I. DOI: 10.1107/S160053681102808X/su2287sup1.cif Structure factors: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S160053681102808X/su2287Isup2.hkl Supplementary material file. DOI: 10.1107/S160053681102808X/su2287Isup3.cml Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report
C6H10N2OF(000) = 272
Mr = 126.16Dx = 1.227 Mg m3
Monoclinic, P21/cMo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Hall symbol: -P 2ybcCell parameters from 3015 reflections
a = 9.1299 (15) Åθ = 2.4–22.9°
b = 7.1600 (11) ŵ = 0.09 mm1
c = 11.374 (2) ÅT = 296 K
β = 113.232 (9)°Plate, colourless
V = 683.2 (2) Å30.21 × 0.19 × 0.11 mm
Z = 4
Bruker APEXII CCD diffractometer1332 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube961 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
graphiteRint = 0.034
φ and ω scansθmax = 26.0°, θmin = 2.4°
Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Bruker, 2001)h = −11→11
Tmin = 0.64, Tmax = 0.83k = −8→8
12120 measured reflectionsl = −13→13
Refinement on F2Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: fullSecondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.049Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
wR(F2) = 0.136H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
S = 1.03w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0674P)2 + 0.2195P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
1332 reflections(Δ/σ)max < 0.001
92 parametersΔρmax = 0.17 e Å3
0 restraintsΔρmin = −0.21 e Å3
Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.
xyzUiso*/Ueq
N10.0756 (2)0.1929 (2)0.58699 (14)0.0427 (5)
H10.029 (3)0.087 (3)0.601 (2)0.051 (6)*
N20.1373 (2)0.3275 (2)0.67795 (15)0.0462 (5)
H20.116 (3)0.326 (3)0.754 (2)0.062 (6)*
O50.07244 (17)0.12652 (19)0.38750 (11)0.0489 (4)
C30.2107 (2)0.4552 (3)0.63369 (17)0.0402 (5)
C3A0.2903 (3)0.6189 (3)0.7141 (2)0.0573 (6)
H3A10.29940.71770.65910.069*
H3A20.22380.66480.75660.069*
C3B0.4512 (4)0.5766 (4)0.8123 (3)0.1014 (12)
H3B10.44240.48590.87140.152*
H3B20.49820.68890.85770.152*
H3B30.51710.52770.77140.152*
C40.1999 (2)0.4015 (2)0.51474 (17)0.0367 (5)
C4A0.2643 (3)0.4995 (3)0.4291 (2)0.0544 (6)
H410.31310.61490.46810.082*
H420.17890.52480.34820.082*
H430.34220.42160.41620.082*
C50.1135 (2)0.2330 (3)0.48611 (16)0.0359 (5)
U11U22U33U12U13U23
N10.0661 (11)0.0389 (9)0.0308 (8)−0.0145 (8)0.0275 (8)−0.0061 (7)
N20.0698 (12)0.0444 (10)0.0313 (9)−0.0109 (8)0.0275 (8)−0.0098 (7)
O50.0759 (10)0.0484 (8)0.0304 (7)−0.0197 (7)0.0295 (7)−0.0092 (6)
C30.0470 (11)0.0362 (10)0.0369 (10)−0.0008 (8)0.0162 (9)−0.0008 (8)
C3A0.0725 (15)0.0467 (12)0.0519 (13)−0.0103 (11)0.0237 (12)−0.0149 (10)
C3B0.084 (2)0.082 (2)0.097 (2)−0.0121 (16)−0.0077 (17)−0.0341 (18)
C40.0428 (10)0.0361 (10)0.0322 (9)−0.0018 (8)0.0159 (8)0.0016 (8)
C4A0.0632 (14)0.0566 (13)0.0485 (12)−0.0143 (11)0.0274 (11)0.0035 (10)
C50.0455 (10)0.0378 (10)0.0266 (9)−0.0018 (8)0.0165 (8)0.0003 (8)
N1—C51.354 (2)C3A—H3A20.9700
N1—N21.363 (2)C3B—H3B10.9600
N1—H10.92 (2)C3B—H3B20.9600
N2—C31.343 (3)C3B—H3B30.9600
N2—H20.95 (3)C4—C51.408 (3)
O5—C51.284 (2)C4—C4A1.495 (3)
C3—C41.372 (3)C4A—H410.9600
C3—C3A1.488 (3)C4A—H420.9600
C3A—C3B1.484 (4)C4A—H430.9600
C3A—H3A10.9700
C5—N1—N2109.01 (16)H3B1—C3B—H3B2109.5
C5—N1—H1128.2 (13)C3A—C3B—H3B3109.5
N2—N1—H1122.3 (13)H3B1—C3B—H3B3109.5
C3—N2—N1108.38 (16)H3B2—C3B—H3B3109.5
C3—N2—H2130.8 (14)C3—C4—C5106.50 (16)
N1—N2—H2120.5 (14)C3—C4—C4A128.08 (17)
N2—C3—C4109.04 (16)C5—C4—C4A125.42 (17)
N2—C3—C3A120.03 (18)C4—C4A—H41109.5
C4—C3—C3A130.90 (18)C4—C4A—H42109.5
C3B—C3A—C3113.6 (2)H41—C4A—H42109.5
C3B—C3A—H3A1108.8C4—C4A—H43109.5
C3—C3A—H3A1108.8H41—C4A—H43109.5
C3B—C3A—H3A2108.8H42—C4A—H43109.5
C3—C3A—H3A2108.8O5—C5—N1122.03 (16)
H3A1—C3A—H3A2107.7O5—C5—C4130.92 (17)
C3A—C3B—H3B1109.5N1—C5—C4107.05 (15)
C3A—C3B—H3B2109.5
C5—N1—N2—C31.6 (2)C3A—C3—C4—C4A−1.7 (3)
N1—N2—C3—C4−1.4 (2)N2—N1—C5—O5178.68 (17)
N1—N2—C3—C3A−179.69 (17)N2—N1—C5—C4−1.2 (2)
N2—C3—C3A—C3B80.6 (3)C3—C4—C5—O5−179.5 (2)
C4—C3—C3A—C3B−97.3 (3)C4A—C4—C5—O50.9 (3)
N2—C3—C4—C50.7 (2)C3—C4—C5—N10.3 (2)
C3A—C3—C4—C5178.7 (2)C4A—C4—C5—N1−179.25 (18)
N2—C3—C4—C4A−179.80 (19)
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
N1—H1···O5i0.91 (2)1.82 (2)2.730 (2)175 (2)
N2—H2···O5ii0.96 (2)1.75 (2)2.693 (2)168 (2)
Table 1

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

D—H⋯AD—HH⋯ADAD—H⋯A
N1—H1⋯O5i0.91 (2)1.82 (2)2.730 (2)175 (2)
N2—H2⋯O5ii0.96 (2)1.75 (2)2.693 (2)168 (2)

Symmetry codes: (i) ; (ii) .

  5 in total

1.  A short history of SHELX.

Authors:  George M Sheldrick
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr A       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 2.290

2.  Synthesis and antimicrobial activities of novel 1,5-diaryl pyrazoles.

Authors:  R Venkat Ragavan; V Vijayakumar; N Suchetha Kumari
Journal:  Eur J Med Chem       Date:  2009-12-28       Impact factor: 6.514

3.  Synthesis of some novel bioactive 4-oxy/thio substituted-1H-pyrazol-5(4H)-ones via efficient cross-Claisen condensation.

Authors:  R Venkat Ragavan; V Vijayakumar; N Suchetha Kumari
Journal:  Eur J Med Chem       Date:  2009-04-14       Impact factor: 6.514

4.  Hydrogen-bonded sheets in 2-(2-aminophenyl)-1H-benzimidazol-3-ium dihydrogen phosphate.

Authors:  S Shylaja; K N Mahendra; K B R Varma; T Narasimhamurthy; R S Rathore
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr C       Date:  2008-06-07       Impact factor: 1.172

5.  Structure validation in chemical crystallography.

Authors:  Anthony L Spek
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr       Date:  2009-01-20
  5 in total
  1 in total

1.  β-Keto esters from ketones and ethyl chloroformate: a rapid, general, efficient synthesis of pyrazolones and their antimicrobial, in silico and in vitro cytotoxicity studies.

Authors:  Ramasamy Venkat Ragavan; Kalavathi Murugan Kumar; Vijayaparthasarathi Vijayakumar; Sundaramoorthy Sarveswari; Sudha Ramaiah; Anand Anbarasu; Sivashanmugam Karthikeyan; Periyasamy Giridharan; Nalilu Suchetha Kumari
Journal:  Org Med Chem Lett       Date:  2013-07-19
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.