Literature DB >> 22089452

Mathematical model identifies blood biomarker-based early cancer detection strategies and limitations.

Sharon S Hori1, Sanjiv S Gambhir.   

Abstract

Most clinical blood biomarkers lack the necessary sensitivity and specificity to reliably detect cancer at an early stage, when it is best treatable. It is not yet clear how early a clinical blood assay can be used to detect cancer or how biomarker-based strategies can be improved to enable earlier detection of smaller tumors. To address these issues, we developed a mathematical model describing dynamic plasma biomarker kinetics in relation to the growth of a tumor, beginning with a single cancer cell. To exemplify a realistic scenario in which biomarker is shed by both cancerous and noncancerous cells, we primed the model on ovarian tumor growth and CA125 shedding data, for which tumor growth parameters and shedding rates are readily available in published literature. We found that a tumor could grow unnoticed for more than 10.1 years and reach a volume of about π/6(25.36 mm)(3), corresponding to a spherical diameter of about 25.36 mm, before becoming detectable by current clinical blood assays. Model parameters were perturbed over log orders of magnitude to quantify ideal shedding rates and identify other blood-based strategies required for early submillimeter tumor detectability. The detection times we estimated are consistent with recently published tumor progression time lines based on clinical genomic sequencing data for several cancers. Here, we rigorously showed that shedding rates of current clinical blood biomarkers are likely 10(4)-fold too low to enable detection of a developing tumor within the first decade of tumor growth. The model presented here can be extended to virtually any solid cancer and associated biomarkers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22089452      PMCID: PMC3423335          DOI: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3003110

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Transl Med        ISSN: 1946-6234            Impact factor:   17.956


  43 in total

1.  THE INTERSTITIAL WATER SPACE OF TUMORS.

Authors:  P M GULLINO; F H GRANTHAM; S H SMITH
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1965-06       Impact factor: 12.701

2.  Predicting the course of Gompertzian growth.

Authors:  L Norton; R Simon; H D Brereton; A E Bogden
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1976-12-09       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  The colorectal microRNAome.

Authors:  Jordan M Cummins; Yiping He; Rebecca J Leary; Ray Pagliarini; Luis A Diaz; Tobias Sjoblom; Omer Barad; Zvi Bentwich; Anna E Szafranska; Emmanuel Labourier; Christopher K Raymond; Brian S Roberts; Hartmut Juhl; Kenneth W Kinzler; Bert Vogelstein; Victor E Velculescu
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-02-27       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 4.  Does tumour dormancy offer a therapeutic target?

Authors:  Paul E Goss; Ann F Chambers
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2010-11-04       Impact factor: 60.716

5.  Analytical chemistry: The matrix neutralized.

Authors:  Ilia Fishbein; Robert J Levy
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2009-10-15       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Bring on the biomarkers.

Authors:  George Poste
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2011-01-13       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Analysis of circulating microRNA biomarkers in plasma and serum using quantitative reverse transcription-PCR (qRT-PCR).

Authors:  Evan M Kroh; Rachael K Parkin; Patrick S Mitchell; Muneesh Tewari
Journal:  Methods       Date:  2010-02-08       Impact factor: 3.608

8.  Prospective study of serum CA-125 levels as markers of ovarian cancer.

Authors:  K J Helzlsouer; T L Bush; A J Alberg; K M Bass; H Zacur; G W Comstock
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1993-03-03       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 9.  Normalization of tumor vasculature: an emerging concept in antiangiogenic therapy.

Authors:  Rakesh K Jain
Journal:  Science       Date:  2005-01-07       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  Matrix-insensitive protein assays push the limits of biosensors in medicine.

Authors:  Richard S Gaster; Drew A Hall; Carsten H Nielsen; Sebastian J Osterfeld; Heng Yu; Kathleen E Mach; Robert J Wilson; Boris Murmann; Joseph C Liao; Sanjiv S Gambhir; Shan X Wang
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2009-10-11       Impact factor: 53.440

View more
  83 in total

1.  Biomarkers: Major mathematical hurdles for biomarker-based screening.

Authors:  Darren J Burgess
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2011-12-08       Impact factor: 60.716

Review 2.  Nanoparticle Probes for the Detection of Cancer Biomarkers, Cells, and Tissues by Fluorescence.

Authors:  Alyssa B Chinen; Chenxia M Guan; Jennifer R Ferrer; Stacey N Barnaby; Timothy J Merkel; Chad A Mirkin
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2015-08-27       Impact factor: 60.622

3.  Complementary Longitudinal Serum Biomarkers to CA125 for Early Detection of Ovarian Cancer.

Authors:  Archana R Simmons; Evangelia Ourania Fourkala; Aleksandra Gentry-Maharaj; Andy Ryan; Margie N Sutton; Keith Baggerly; Hui Zheng; Karen H Lu; Ian Jacobs; Steven Skates; Usha Menon; Robert C Bast
Journal:  Cancer Prev Res (Phila)       Date:  2019-04-09

Review 4.  Multiscale imaging and computational modeling of blood flow in the tumor vasculature.

Authors:  Eugene Kim; Spyros Stamatelos; Jana Cebulla; Zaver M Bhujwalla; Aleksander S Popel; Arvind P Pathak
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2012-05-08       Impact factor: 3.934

5.  General Assessment of Humoral Activity in Healthy Humans.

Authors:  Phillip Stafford; Daniel Wrapp; Stephen Albert Johnston
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2016-02-22       Impact factor: 5.911

6.  Point-of-care diagnostics for noncommunicable diseases using synthetic urinary biomarkers and paper microfluidics.

Authors:  Andrew D Warren; Gabriel A Kwong; David K Wood; Kevin Y Lin; Sangeeta N Bhatia
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-02-24       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Circulating Biomarkers to Identify Patients With Resectable Pancreatic Cancer.

Authors:  Michael Goggins
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2017-08-01       Impact factor: 13.506

8.  Engineered immune cells as highly sensitive cancer diagnostics.

Authors:  Amin Aalipour; Hui-Yen Chuang; Surya Murty; Aloma L D'Souza; Seung-Min Park; Gunsagar S Gulati; Chirag B Patel; Corinne Beinat; Federico Simonetta; Ivana Martinić; Gayatri Gowrishankar; Elise R Robinson; Eamon Aalipour; Zahra Zhian; Sanjiv S Gambhir
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2019-03-18       Impact factor: 54.908

9.  Ultrasensitive detection of circulating tumour DNA via deep methylation sequencing aided by machine learning.

Authors:  Naixin Liang; Bingsi Li; Ziqi Jia; Chenyang Wang; Pancheng Wu; Tao Zheng; Yanyu Wang; Fujun Qiu; Yijun Wu; Jing Su; Jiayue Xu; Feng Xu; Huiling Chu; Shuai Fang; Xingyu Yang; Chengju Wu; Zhili Cao; Lei Cao; Zhongxing Bing; Hongsheng Liu; Li Li; Cheng Huang; Yingzhi Qin; Yushang Cui; Han Han-Zhang; Jianxing Xiang; Hao Liu; Xin Guo; Shanqing Li; Heng Zhao; Zhihong Zhang
Journal:  Nat Biomed Eng       Date:  2021-06-15       Impact factor: 25.671

10.  Toward development of a surface-enhanced Raman scattering (SERS)-based cancer diagnostic immunoassay panel.

Authors:  Jennifer H Granger; Michael C Granger; Matthew A Firpo; Sean J Mulvihill; Marc D Porter
Journal:  Analyst       Date:  2013-01-21       Impact factor: 4.616

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.