Literature DB >> 8433467

Prospective study of serum CA-125 levels as markers of ovarian cancer.

K J Helzlsouer1, T L Bush, A J Alberg, K M Bass, H Zacur, G W Comstock.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate prospectively the sensitivity and specificity of serum CA-125 levels for the detection of ovarian cancer.
DESIGN: Case-control study nested within a cohort of women who donated blood to a community-based serum bank established in 1974.
SETTING: Washington County, Maryland. POPULATION: Cases consisted of 37 women who developed ovarian cancer from 1975 through 1989. Controls consisted of 73 women, matched on age and time since last menstrual period, and free of cancer until the cases' diagnoses. STUDY VARIABLE: Serum CA-125 levels. OUTCOME MEASURE: Histologically confirmed ovarian cancer.
RESULTS: Levels of serum CA-125 among cases were higher than among controls for each 3-year interval up to 12 years prior to the time of the cases' diagnoses. The median level for cases diagnosed within the first 3 years of follow-up was 35.4 U/mL compared with 9.0 U/mL for controls (P = .002). The sensitivity of a serum CA-125 level greater than 35 U/mL within the first 3 years was 57% (95% confidence interval, 20% to 88%) and the specificity was 100% (95% confidence interval lower limit, 73%). Sensitivity and specificity decreased with increasing time to diagnosis.
CONCLUSIONS: Measurement of serum CA-125 levels, particularly at a reference value of 35 U/mL, is not sufficiently sensitive to be used alone as a screening test for the detection of ovarian cancer. Lower CA-125 reference values could identify women at higher risk of developing ovarian cancer, but CA-125 measurement cannot be recommended for this purpose because of the high proportion of women who would be falsely classified as being at high risk for developing ovarian cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8433467

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  19 in total

Review 1.  Modern trends into the epidemiology and screening of ovarian cancer. Genetic substrate of the sporadic form.

Authors:  Maria Koutsaki; Apostolos Zaravinos; Demetrios A Spandidos
Journal:  Pathol Oncol Res       Date:  2011-12-09       Impact factor: 3.201

2.  Sensitive biomarkers of cancer recurrence and metastasis: inexpensive tools to cut costs and reduce radiation exposure among cancer patients.

Authors:  Timothy V Johnson; Viraj A Master
Journal:  Mol Diagn Ther       Date:  2012-02-01       Impact factor: 4.074

3.  Hunting for a pleural fluid test for mesothelioma: is soluble mesothelin the answer?

Authors:  Y C Gary Lee
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 9.139

4.  p53 autoantibodies as potential detection and prognostic biomarkers in serous ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Karen S Anderson; Jessica Wong; Allison Vitonis; Christopher P Crum; Patrick M Sluss; Joshua Labaer; Daniel Cramer
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2010-03-03       Impact factor: 4.254

5.  Challenges related to developing serum-based biomarkers for early ovarian cancer detection.

Authors:  Phuong L Mai; Nicolas Wentzensen; Mark H Greene
Journal:  Cancer Prev Res (Phila)       Date:  2011-03

6.  Prediagnostic circulating follicle stimulating hormone concentrations and ovarian cancer risk.

Authors:  Meghan A McSorley; Anthony J Alberg; Diane S Allen; Naomi E Allen; Louise A Brinton; Joanne F Dorgan; Rudolf Kaaks; Sabina Rinaldi; Kathy J Helzlsouer
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2009-08-01       Impact factor: 7.396

7.  Ovarian cancer pathogenesis: a model in evolution.

Authors:  Alison M Karst; Ronny Drapkin
Journal:  J Oncol       Date:  2009-09-06       Impact factor: 4.375

8.  Use of a Symptom Index, CA125, and HE4 to predict ovarian cancer.

Authors:  M Robyn Andersen; Barbara A Goff; Kimberly A Lowe; Nathalie Scholler; Lindsay Bergan; Charles W Drescher; Pamela Paley; Nicole Urban
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2009-11-28       Impact factor: 5.482

9.  Role of CA125 in predicting ovarian cancer survival - a review of the epidemiological literature.

Authors:  Digant Gupta; Christopher G Lis
Journal:  J Ovarian Res       Date:  2009-10-09       Impact factor: 4.234

10.  Assessing lead time of selected ovarian cancer biomarkers: a nested case-control study.

Authors:  Garnet L Anderson; Martin McIntosh; Lieling Wu; Matt Barnett; Gary Goodman; Jason D Thorpe; Lindsay Bergan; Mark D Thornquist; Nathalie Scholler; Nam Kim; Kathy O'Briant; Charles Drescher; Nicole Urban
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2009-12-30       Impact factor: 13.506

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.