| Literature DB >> 22087545 |
Elena Azzini1, Angela Polito, Alessandro Fumagalli, Federica Intorre, Eugenia Venneria, Alessandra Durazzo, Maria Zaccaria, Donatella Ciarapica, Maria S Foddai, Beatrice Mauro, Anna Raguzzini, Lara Palomba, Giuseppe Maiani.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the overall diet quality effects, mainly on antioxidant nutritional status and some cytokines related to the cellular immune response as well as oxidative stress in a healthy Italian population group.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2011 PMID: 22087545 PMCID: PMC3252250 DOI: 10.1186/1475-2891-10-125
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nutr J ISSN: 1475-2891 Impact factor: 3.271
Characteristics of subjects by sex (mean ± sd)
| Men | Women | P values | |
|---|---|---|---|
| n° | 64 | 67 | |
| Age (yrs) | 34 ± 4 | 31 ± 6 | 0.000 |
| Weight (kg) | 80.2 ± 10.0 | 59.0 ± 8.1 | 0.000 |
| High (cm) | 177.8 ± 7.4 | 162.1 ± 6.4 | 0.000 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 25.2 ± 2.4 | 22.5 ± 2.7 | 0.000 |
Statistic: Anova
Daily macronutrients intake (g/day) and energy (%) by sex (mean ± s.d.)
| Men | Women | P values | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2701 ± 469 | 1971 ± 457 | 0.000 | |
| 105 ± 23 | 75 ± 20 | 0.000 | |
| 16 ± 3 | 15 ± 2 | 0.02 | |
| 112 ± 22 | 85 ± 23 | 0.000 | |
| 38 ± 5 | 39 ± 5 | n.s | |
| 8 ± 3 | 6 ± 2 | 0.000 | |
| 3 ± 1 | 3 ± 1 | n.s | |
| 42 ± 13 | 31 ± 11 | 0.000 | |
| 14 ± 4 | 14 ± 4 | n.s | |
| 21 ± 6 | 17 ± 5 | 0.000 | |
| 7 ± 2 | 7 ± 2 | n.s | |
| 0.42 ± 0.14 | 0.42 ± 0.12 | n.s | |
| 2.1 ± 0.6 | 2.1 ± 0.5 | n.s | |
| 316 ± 79 | 234 ± 65 | 0.000 | |
| 44 ± 6 | 44 ± 6 | n.s | |
| 17 ± 7 | 14 ± 6 | 0.009 | |
| 12 ± 13 | 4 ± 7 | 0.000 | |
| 3 ± 3 | 1 ± 3 | 0.000 |
Statistic: Student's t-test
Daily micronutrients intake by sex (mean ± s.d.)
| Men | Women | P value | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 12.6 ± 3.5 | 9.5 ± 3.3 | 0.000 | |
| 867 ± 328 | 713 ± 212 | 0.002 | |
| 3067 ± 968 | 2370 ± 743 | 0.000 | |
| 1496 ± 342 | 1131 ± 283 | 0.000 | |
| 12.3 ± 3.5 | 8.8 ± 2.7 | 0.000 | |
| 1.2 ± 0.5 | 1.1 ± 0.6 | n.s | |
| 19.9 ± 5.8 | 16.0 ± 8.0 | 0.002 | |
| 2.1 ± 0.7 | 1.8 ± 1.0 | 0.05 | |
| 257 ± 68 | 200 ± 73 | 0.000 | |
| 1.7 ± 0.5 | 1.5 ± 0.8 | n.s | |
| 1355 ± 866 | 1071 ± 616 | 0.000 | |
| 15.3 ± 5.2 | 12.5 ± 4.8 | 0.002 | |
| 2.1 ± 1.7 | 1.6 ± 1.3 | n.s | |
| 142.8 ± 74.0 | 114.0 ± 68.0 | 0.022 |
Statistics: Student's t-test
Average consumption of food groups* (g/day) by MDS classes.
| DIET QUALITY | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Low | Medium | High | P values | |
| 26 | 45 | 29 | ||
| 225 ± 53 | 248 ± 71 | 267 ± 76 | 0.02 | |
| 167 ± 113 | 225 ± 127 | 261 ± 97 | 0.0008 | |
| 7 ± 19 | 18 ± 27 | 22 ± 23 | 0.02 | |
| 162 ± 162 | 209 ± 188 | 389 ± 238 | 0.00000 | |
| 39 ± 40 | 61 ± 62 | 88 ± 96 | 0.005 | |
| 161 ± 112 | 119 ± 65 | 114 ± 90 | 0.02 | |
| 305 ± 160 | 227 ± 128 | 195 ± 170 | 0.002 | |
| 9 ± 11 | 8 ± 12 | 5 ± 10 | n.s. | |
| 1.8 ± 0.4 | 2 ± 0.5 | 2.3 ± 0.6 | 0.00003 | |
*Food groups were adjusted to 2500 kcal for men and 2000 kcal for women
Statistic: Anova
Sample distribution (%) by lifestyle habits, sociodemographic characteristics, coronary heart disease risk and diet quality
| DIET QUALITY | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Low | Medium | High | |
| % | % | % | |
| 11 | 36 | 16 | |
| 81 | 55 | 68 | |
| 8 | 9 | 16 | |
| 19 | 47 | 34 | |
| 40 | 42 | 19 | |
| 46 | 39 | 22 | |
* calculated on waist circumference values: men ≥ 94 cm; women ≥ 80 cm
Lipidemic profile, antioxidant status, immune status and lipid peroxidation indicator by diet quality (mean ± SEM)
| DIET QUALITY | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Low | Medium | High | |
| 4.55 ± 0.10 | 4.63 ± 0.08 | 4.60 ± 0.10 | |
| 1.26 ± 0.05 | 1.32 ± 0.05 | 1.35 ± 0.05 | |
| 2.95 ± 0.10 | 3.00 ± 0.10 | 3.10 ± 0.10 | |
| 0.78 ± 0.06 | 0.77 ± 0.05 | 0.72 ± 0.06 | |
| 976 ± 42 | 883 ± 22 | 953 ± 28 | |
| 842 ± 34 | 855 ± 22 | 886 ± 26 | |
| 0.34 ± 0.02 | 0.35 ± 0.01 | 0.38 ± 0.02 | |
| 546 ± 31 | 524 ± 29 | 520 ± 32 | |
| 41.2 ± 2.5 | 48.8 ± 2.1 | 49.2 ± 2.7 | |
| 37.0 ± 3.7 | 41.3 ± 3.6 | 40.0 ± 5.1 | |
| 1.87 ± 0.08 | 1.89 ± 0.06 | 2.05 ± 0.08 | |
| 23.22 ± 0.93 | 23.44 ± 0.46 | 24.15 ± 0.70 | |
| 49.97 ± 2.27 | 52.24 ± 1.70 | 48.27 ± 2.27 | |
| 0.57 ± 0.05 | 0.63 ± 0.04 | 0.64 ± 0.05 | |
| 0.16 ± 0.02 | 0.15 ± 0.02 | 0.20 ± 0.02 | |
| 0.79 ± 0.02 | 0.83 ± 0.02 | 0.83 ± 0.02 | |
| 0.07 ± 0.02 | 0.07 ± 0.01 | 0.08 ± 0.01 | |
| 0.55 ± 0.07 | 0.57 ± 0.06 | 0.58 ± 0.07 | |
| 42.4 ± 9.0a | 35.7 ± 7.0a | 14.8 ± 2.9b | |
| 8.3 ± 3.3a | 9.98 ± 1.3a | 19.5 ± 5.2b | |
| 118 ± 7 | 104 ± 7 | 110 ± 7 | |
Statistic: Anova P < 0.05 a versus b
Figure 1Levels of TNF α and IL10 versus Vitamin A levels by MDS.