Literature DB >> 16755420

[Adherence with daily and weekly administration of oral bisphosphonates for osteoporosis treatment].

R Bartl1, S Götte, P Hadji, T Hammerschmidt.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
OBJECTIVE: Bisphosphonates provide efficacious treatment for osteoporosis. However, side effects often lead to patients discontinuing this treatment. This study analyses differences in adherence (including acceptance, persistence and compliance) between daily (ALD-D) and weekly (ALD-W) administration of alendronate among German patients with osteoporosis.
METHODS: Prescription claims data of two random groups of subjects (144 patients each) taking ALD-D and ALD-W, respectively, were observed for 12 months after starting the given prescription. Termination was defined as the moment when the last prescription had been used up. The percentage of patients continuing the drug treatment after the first prescription was used as a measure for acceptance. Compliance was measured by the medication possession ratio (MPR), namely the percentage of days on which the patient was supplied with the medication. An MPR > 80% is therapeutically relevant because the risk of fractures is significantly reduced.
RESULTS: 31.3% (ALD-W) vs. 45.8% (ALD-D) of patients discontinued therapy after one prescription. 53.5% (ALD-W) vs. 72.2% (ALD-D) of patients discontinued therapy throughout the year. The proportion of those who discontinued the treatment was significantly higher with daily administration (p=0.0035). Mean time until discontinuation was 220 days (ALD-W) vs. 169 days (ALD-D). Mean compliance among any patients was 51.7% (ALD-W) vs. 37.7% (ALD-D); Only 30.6% (ALD-W) vs. 19.2% (ALD-D) (p=0,0295) of patients reached a therapeutically relevant compliance level.
CONCLUSIONS: A large proportion of patients discontinued treatment with bisphosphonates, a majority of discontinuing patients not even refilling their first prescription. Adherence, although enhanced by less frequent dosing, was suboptimal in all of its aspects, i.e. acceptance, persistence and compliance. There is a need for treatment strategies to increase adherence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16755420     DOI: 10.1055/s-2006-946559

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dtsch Med Wochenschr        ISSN: 0012-0472            Impact factor:   0.628


  11 in total

1.  Rapid Onset and Sustained Efficacy (ROSE) study: results of a randomised, multicentre trial comparing the effect of zoledronic acid or alendronate on bone metabolism in postmenopausal women with low bone mass.

Authors:  P Hadji; D Gamerdinger; W Spieler; P H Kann; H Loeffler; K Articus; R Möricke; V Ziller
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2011-03-26       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  Quality of life and health status with zoledronic acid and generic alendronate--a secondary analysis of the Rapid Onset and Sustained Efficacy (ROSE) study in postmenopausal women with low bone mass.

Authors:  P Hadji; V Ziller; D Gamerdinger; W Spieler; K Articus; M Baier; R Moericke; P H Kann
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2011-11-16       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  GRAND: the German retrospective cohort analysis on compliance and persistence and the associated risk of fractures in osteoporotic women treated with oral bisphosphonates.

Authors:  P Hadji; V Claus; V Ziller; M Intorcia; K Kostev; T Steinle
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2011-02-10       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  Cost effectiveness of the German screen-and-treat strategy for postmenopausal osteoporosis.

Authors:  Dirk Mueller; Eva Weyler; Afschin Gandjour
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 4.981

5.  Characterisation of patients with postmenopausal osteoporosis in French primary healthcare.

Authors:  Francis Blotman; Bernard Cortet; Pascal Hilliquin; Bernard Avouac; François-André Allaert; Denis Pouchain; Anne-Françoise Gaudin; François-Emery Cotté; Abdelkader El Hasnaoui
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 3.923

6.  Patients' preferences for osteoporosis drug treatment: a discrete choice experiment.

Authors:  E W de Bekker-Grob; M L Essink-Bot; W J Meerding; H A P Pols; B W Koes; E W Steyerberg
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2008-01-08       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 7.  Tolerability of different dosing regimens of bisphosphonates for the treatment of osteoporosis and malignant bone disease.

Authors:  Raja S Bobba; Karen Beattie; Bill Parkinson; Dinesh Kumbhare; Jonathan D Adachi
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 5.228

Review 8.  Challenges in implementing and maintaining osteoporosis therapy.

Authors:  Ankita Modi; Shiva Sajjan; Sampada Gandhi
Journal:  Int J Womens Health       Date:  2014-08-13

Review 9.  Management of Aromatase Inhibitor-Associated Bone Loss (AIBL) in postmenopausal women with hormone sensitive breast cancer: Joint position statement of the IOF, CABS, ECTS, IEG, ESCEO IMS, and SIOG.

Authors:  Peyman Hadji; Matti S Aapro; Jean-Jacques Body; Michael Gnant; Maria Luisa Brandi; Jean Yves Reginster; M Carola Zillikens; Claus-C Glüer; Tobie de Villiers; Rod Baber; G David Roodman; Cyrus Cooper; Bente Langdahl; Santiago Palacios; John Kanis; Nasser Al-Daghri; Xavier Nogues; Erik Fink Eriksen; Andreas Kurth; Rene Rizzoli; Robert E Coleman
Journal:  J Bone Oncol       Date:  2017-03-23       Impact factor: 4.072

Review 10.  Bisphosphonates in the management of postmenopausal osteoporosis--optimizing efficacy in clinical practice.

Authors:  Oliver Bock; Dieter Felsenberg
Journal:  Clin Interv Aging       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 4.458

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.