Literature DB >> 17356162

The effect of the design of the femoral component on the conformity of the patellofemoral joint in total knee replacement.

H-M Ma1, Y-C Lu, T-G Kwok, F-Y Ho, C-Y Huang, C-H Huang.   

Abstract

One of the most controversial issues in total knee replacement is whether or not to resurface the patella. In order to determine the effects of different designs of femoral component on the conformity of the patellofemoral joint, five different knee prostheses were investigated. These were Low Contact Stress, the Miller-Galante II, the NexGen, the Porous-Coated Anatomic, and the Total Condylar prostheses. Three-dimensional models of the prostheses and a native patella were developed and assessed by computer. The conformity of the curvature of the five different prosthetic femoral components to their corresponding patellar implants and to the native patella at different angles of flexion was assessed by measuring the angles of intersection of tangential lines. The Total Condylar prosthesis had the lowest conformity with the native patella (mean 8.58 degrees ; 0.14 degrees to 29.9 degrees ) and with its own patellar component (mean 11.36 degrees ; 0.55 degrees to 39.19 degrees ). In the other four prostheses, the conformity was better (mean 2.25 degrees ; 0.02 degrees to 10.52 degrees ) when articulated with the corresponding patellar component. The Porous-Coated Anatomic femoral component showed better conformity (mean 6.51 degrees ; 0.07 degrees to 9.89 degrees ) than the Miller-Galante II prosthesis (mean 11.20 degrees ; 5.80 degrees to 16.72 degrees ) when tested with the native patella. Although the Nexgen prosthesis had less conformity with the native patella at a low angle of flexion, this improved at mid (mean 3.57 degrees ; 1.40 degrees to 4.56 degrees ) or high angles of flexion (mean 4.54 degrees ; 0.91 degrees to 9.39 degrees ), respectively. The Low Contact Stress femoral component had the best conformity with the native patella (mean 2.39 degrees ; 0.04 degrees to 4.56 degrees ). There was no significant difference (p > 0.208) between the conformity when tested with the native patella or its own patellar component at any angle of flexion. The geometry of the anterior flange of a femoral component affects the conformity of the patellofemoral joint when articulating with the native patella. A more anatomical design of femoral component is preferable if the surgeon decides not to resurface the patella at the time of operation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17356162     DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.89B3.18276

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br        ISSN: 0301-620X


  15 in total

Review 1.  [The third compartment in knee endoprosthetics: from denervation to replacement, which therapy is correct?].

Authors:  C Stärke; E F Röpke; C H Lohmann
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 1.087

Review 2.  Systematic review of patellar resurfacing in total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Shuzhen Li; Yueping Chen; Wei Su; Jinmin Zhao; Shunqing He; Xiangping Luo
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2010-08-31       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Evolution of trochlear compartment geometry in total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Mo Saffarini; Guillaume Demey; Luca Nover; David Dejour
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2016-01

4.  Patellofemoral kinematics during deep knee flexion after total knee replacement: a computational simulation.

Authors:  Chang-Hung Huang; Lin-I Hsu; Kun-Jhih Lin; Ting-Kuo Chang; Cheng-Kung Cheng; Yung-Chang Lu; Chen-Sheng Chen; Chun-Hsiung Huang
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-01-03       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  Evaluation of patellofemoral joint in ADVANCE Medial-pivot total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Nobuaki Chinzei; Kazunari Ishida; Tomoyuki Matsumoto; Yuichi Kuroda; Atsushi Kitagawa; Ryosuke Kuroda; Toshihiro Akisue; Kotaro Nishida; Masahiro Kurosaka; Nobuhiro Tsumura
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2013-08-08       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  Stress distribution of the patellofemoral joint in the anatomic V-shape and curved dome-shape femoral component: a comparison of resurfaced and unresurfaced patellae.

Authors:  Chang-Hung Huang; Lin-I Hsu; Ting-Kuo Chang; Tai-Yuan Chuang; Shih-Liang Shih; Yung-Chang Lu; Chen-Sheng Chen; Chun-Hsiung Huang
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-12-25       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  Cruciate-retaining TKA using a third-generation system with a four-pegged tibial component: a minimum 10-year followup note.

Authors:  Adam J Schwartz; Craig J Della Valle; Aaron G Rosenberg; Joshua J Jacobs; Richard A Berger; Jorge O Galante
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-05-04       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Patellar morphology and femoral component geometry influence patellofemoral contact stress in total knee arthroplasty without patellar resurfacing.

Authors:  Atsushi Takahashi; Hirotaka Sano; Masahiro Ohnuma; Mitsuhiro Kashiwaba; Daisuke Chiba; Masayuki Kamimura; Takehiko Sugita; Eiji Itoi
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-11-16       Impact factor: 4.342

9.  Intraoperative anthropomorphic study of anterior femoral condyles compared with sizing of femoral arthroplasty.

Authors:  Ai-Bing Huang; Hai-Jun Wang; Bo Yang; Chang-Hui Song; Ji-Ying Zhang; Jia-Kuo Yu
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-12-26       Impact factor: 4.342

10.  Long-Term Comparison Study of Patella Resurfacing Versus Non-resurfacing in Total Knee Arthroplasty with Minimum 10-Year Follow-Up.

Authors:  Jai Thilak; Vipin Mohan
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2020-06-07       Impact factor: 1.251

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.