UNLABELLED: Study Type - Therapy (case series). Level of Evidence 4. What's known on the subject? and What does the study add? Treatment regret can have an adverse impact on a patient's overall outlook and has been associated with a poorer global quality of life. Understanding predictors of regret can help clinicians better counsel patients about their treatments so that later regret can be avoided. In previous studies, regret has been associated with lesser educational attainment, non-White race, greater post-treatment declines in sexual function and systemic symptoms. The present study found that, among men with recurrent prostate cancer, those with cardiovascular comorbidity were >50% more likely to regret their treatment choice than men without cardiovascular comorbidity. This study highlights the growing importance of considering comorbidity when counselling patients about prostate cancer treatment options, and provides a rationale for men with cardiovascular comorbidity to give additional consideration to active surveillance for their newly diagnosed prostate cancer. OBJECTIVE: • To determine whether cardiovascular comorbidity is associated with increased treatment regret among men with recurrent prostate cancer. METHODS: • The study cohort comprised 795 men in the Comprehensive, Observational, Multicenter, Prostate Adenocarcinoma (COMPARE) registry who experienced biochemical recurrence at a median (interquartile range) of 5.5 (2.8-9.1) years after prostatectomy (n= 410), external beam radiation therapy (n= 237), brachytherapy (n= 124) or primary androgen deprivation therapy (n= 24). • Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to determine whether cardiovascular comorbidity was associated with treatment regret. • Cardiovascular comorbidity, which included myocardial infarction, congestive heart failure, angina, diabetes, stroke or circulation problems, was defined using a validated two-question screening process after adjusting for sociodemographic and treatment factors and post-treatment bladder and bowel toxicity. RESULTS: • Of 795 men, 14.8% reported regret. • Men with cardiovascular comorbidity were more likely to experience post-therapy bowel toxicity (P= 0.022). • In the adjusted multivariable model, the factors associated with increased treatment regret were: cardiovascular comorbidity (adjusted odds ratio [AOR]= 1.52 [95% CI:1.00-2.31], P= 0.048); younger age (AOR: 0.97 [95% CI 0.94-0.99] per year increase in age, P= 0.019); and bowel toxicity after treatment (AOR 1.58 [95% CI 1.03-2.43], P= 0.038). CONCLUSIONS: • Among men with recurrent prostate cancer, those with cardiovascular comorbidity were >50% more likely to experience treatment regret than men without cardiovascular comorbidity. • These data provide a rationale for men with cardiovascular comorbidity to give additional consideration to active surveillance for their newly diagnosed prostate cancer.
UNLABELLED: Study Type - Therapy (case series). Level of Evidence 4. What's known on the subject? and What does the study add? Treatment regret can have an adverse impact on a patient's overall outlook and has been associated with a poorer global quality of life. Understanding predictors of regret can help clinicians better counsel patients about their treatments so that later regret can be avoided. In previous studies, regret has been associated with lesser educational attainment, non-White race, greater post-treatment declines in sexual function and systemic symptoms. The present study found that, among men with recurrent prostate cancer, those with cardiovascular comorbidity were >50% more likely to regret their treatment choice than men without cardiovascular comorbidity. This study highlights the growing importance of considering comorbidity when counselling patients about prostate cancer treatment options, and provides a rationale for men with cardiovascular comorbidity to give additional consideration to active surveillance for their newly diagnosed prostate cancer. OBJECTIVE: • To determine whether cardiovascular comorbidity is associated with increased treatment regret among men with recurrent prostate cancer. METHODS: • The study cohort comprised 795 men in the Comprehensive, Observational, Multicenter, Prostate Adenocarcinoma (COMPARE) registry who experienced biochemical recurrence at a median (interquartile range) of 5.5 (2.8-9.1) years after prostatectomy (n= 410), external beam radiation therapy (n= 237), brachytherapy (n= 124) or primary androgen deprivation therapy (n= 24). • Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to determine whether cardiovascular comorbidity was associated with treatment regret. • Cardiovascular comorbidity, which included myocardial infarction, congestive heart failure, angina, diabetes, stroke or circulation problems, was defined using a validated two-question screening process after adjusting for sociodemographic and treatment factors and post-treatment bladder and bowel toxicity. RESULTS: • Of 795 men, 14.8% reported regret. • Men with cardiovascular comorbidity were more likely to experience post-therapy bowel toxicity (P= 0.022). • In the adjusted multivariable model, the factors associated with increased treatment regret were: cardiovascular comorbidity (adjusted odds ratio [AOR]= 1.52 [95% CI:1.00-2.31], P= 0.048); younger age (AOR: 0.97 [95% CI 0.94-0.99] per year increase in age, P= 0.019); and bowel toxicity after treatment (AOR 1.58 [95% CI 1.03-2.43], P= 0.038). CONCLUSIONS: • Among men with recurrent prostate cancer, those with cardiovascular comorbidity were >50% more likely to experience treatment regret than men without cardiovascular comorbidity. • These data provide a rationale for men with cardiovascular comorbidity to give additional consideration to active surveillance for their newly diagnosed prostate cancer.
Authors: B A Mahal; M-H Chen; C L Bennett; M W Kattan; O Sartor; K Stein; A V D'Amico; P L Nguyen Journal: Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis Date: 2014-10-28 Impact factor: 5.554
Authors: Arti Parekh; Ming-Hui Chen; Karen E Hoffman; Toni K Choueiri; Jim C Hu; Charles L Bennett; Michael W Kattan; Oliver Sartor; Karen Stein; Powell L Graham; Anthony V D'Amico; Paul L Nguyen Journal: Urology Date: 2013-01 Impact factor: 2.649
Authors: Richard M Hoffman; Mary Lo; Jack A Clark; Peter C Albertsen; Michael J Barry; Michael Goodman; David F Penson; Janet L Stanford; Antoinette M Stroup; Ann S Hamilton Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2017-05-11 Impact factor: 44.544