Literature DB >> 22084189

Novel oncologic drugs: what they do and how they affect images.

Roberto García Figueiras1, Anwar R Padhani, Vicky J Goh, Joan C Vilanova, Sandra Baleato González, Carmen Villalba Martín, Antonio Gómez Caamaño, Anaberta Bermúdez Naveira, Peter L Choyke.   

Abstract

Targeted therapies are designed to interfere with specific aberrant biologic pathways involved in tumor development. The main classes of novel oncologic drugs include antiangiogenic drugs, antivascular agents, drugs interfering with EGFR-HER2 or KIT receptors, inhibitors of the PI3K/Akt/mTOR pathway, and hormonal therapies. Cancer cells usurp normal signal transduction pathways used by growth factors to stimulate proliferation and sustain viability. The interaction of growth factors with their receptors activates different intracellular pathways affecting key tumor biologic processes such as neoangiogenesis, tumor metabolism, and tumor proliferation. The response of tumors to anticancer therapy can be evaluated with anatomic response assessment, qualitative response assessment, and response assessment with functional and molecular imaging. Angiogenesis can be measured by means of perfusion imaging with computed tomography and magnetic resonance (MR) imaging. Diffusion-weighted MR imaging allows imaging evaluation of tumor cellularity. The main imaging techniques for studying tumor metabolism in vivo are positron emission tomography and MR spectroscopy. Familiarity with imaging findings secondary to tumor response to targeted therapies may help the radiologist better assist the clinician in accurate evaluation of tumor response to these anticancer treatments. Functional and molecular imaging techniques may provide valuable data and augment conventional assessment of tumor response to targeted therapies. Supplemental material available at http://radiographics.rsna.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10.1148/rg.317115108/-/DC1.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22084189     DOI: 10.1148/rg.317115108

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiographics        ISSN: 0271-5333            Impact factor:   5.333


  25 in total

1.  Investigating the Robustness Neighborhood Gray Tone Difference Matrix and Gray Level Co-occurrence Matrix Radiomic Features on Clinical Computed Tomography Systems Using Anthropomorphic Phantoms: Evidence From a Multivendor Study.

Authors:  Usman Mahmood; Aditya P Apte; Joseph O Deasy; C Ross Schmidtlein; Amita Shukla-Dave
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  2017 Nov/Dec       Impact factor: 1.826

2.  Role of contrast-enhanced ultrasound to define prognosis and predict response to biotherapy in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors.

Authors:  M Del Prete; A Di Sarno; R Modica; F Lassandro; A Giorgio; A Bianco; M Muto; M Gasperi; F Del Prete; A Colao; V Montesarchio; A Faggiano
Journal:  J Endocrinol Invest       Date:  2017-06-30       Impact factor: 4.256

Review 3.  Recommendations for the clinical and radiological evaluation of response to treatment in metastatic renal cell cancer.

Authors:  Luís León; Roberto García-Figueiras; Roberto García-Figueras; Cristina Suárez; Antonia Arjonilla; Javier Puente; Blanca Vargas; Maria José Méndez Vidal; Carmen Sebastiá
Journal:  Target Oncol       Date:  2013-12-12       Impact factor: 4.493

4.  Diagnostic power of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging for the presence of lymph node metastasis: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Xiang-Chuang Kong; Ling-Yun Xiong; Emre Gazyakan; Holger Engel; Ulrich Kneser; Andreas K Nüssler; Christoph Hirche; Xiang-Quan Kong
Journal:  J Huazhong Univ Sci Technolog Med Sci       Date:  2017-08-08

Review 5.  Volumetric analysis at abdominal CT: oncologic and non-oncologic applications.

Authors:  Virginia B Planz; Meghan G Lubner; Perry J Pickhardt
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2018-11-30       Impact factor: 3.039

6.  Comparing primary tumors and metastatic nodes in head and neck cancer using intravoxel incoherent motion imaging: a preliminary experience.

Authors:  Yonggang Lu; Jacobus F A Jansen; Hilda E Stambuk; Gaorav Gupta; Nancy Lee; Mithat Gonen; Andre Moreira; Yousef Mazaheri; Snehal G Patel; Joseph O Deasy; Jatin P Shah; Amita Shukla-Dave
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  2013 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.826

7.  Quantification of Iodine Concentration Using Single-Source Dual-Energy Computed Tomography in a Calf Liver.

Authors:  Andrea Agostini; Usman Mahmood; Yusuf Erdi; Alessandra Borgheresi; Monica Ragucci; Peter Sawan; Davinia Ryan; Maria Elena Laino; Giuseppe Corrias; Lorenzo Mannelli
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  2018 Mar/Apr       Impact factor: 1.826

8.  Phase I clinical trial of lenalidomide in combination with sorafenib in patients with advanced cancer.

Authors:  Prasanth Ganesan; Sarina Piha-Paul; Aung Naing; Gerald Falchook; Jennifer Wheler; Siqing Fu; David S Hong; Razelle Kurzrock; Filip Janku; Shell Laday; Agop Y Bedikian; Merrill Kies; Robert A Wolff; Apostolia M Tsimberidou
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  2013-06-12       Impact factor: 3.850

9.  Translation in solid cancer: are size-based response criteria an anachronism?

Authors:  M Fernandes; D Rosel; J Brábek
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2014-07-30       Impact factor: 3.405

Review 10.  Imaging biomarkers for evaluating tumor response: RECIST and beyond.

Authors:  Ching-Chung Ko; Lee-Ren Yeh; Yu-Ting Kuo; Jeon-Hor Chen
Journal:  Biomark Res       Date:  2021-07-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.