Literature DB >> 24338498

Recommendations for the clinical and radiological evaluation of response to treatment in metastatic renal cell cancer.

Luís León1, Roberto García-Figueiras, Roberto García-Figueras, Cristina Suárez, Antonia Arjonilla, Javier Puente, Blanca Vargas, Maria José Méndez Vidal, Carmen Sebastiá.   

Abstract

The evaluation of response to treatment is a critical step for determining the effectiveness of oncology drugs. Targeted therapies such as tyrosine kinase inhibitors and mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors are active drugs in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). However, treatment with this type of drugs may not result in significant reductions in tumor size, so standard evaluation criteria based on tumor size, such as Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST), may be inappropriate for evaluating response to treatment in patients with mRCC. In fact, targeted therapies apparently yield low response rates that do not reflect increased disease control they may cause and, consequently, the benefit in terms of time to progression. To improve the clinical and radiological evaluation of response to treatment in patients with mRCC treated with targeted drugs, a group of 32 experts in this field have reviewed different aspects related to this issue and have put together a series of recommendations with the intention of providing guidance to clinicians on this matter.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24338498     DOI: 10.1007/s11523-013-0304-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Target Oncol        ISSN: 1776-2596            Impact factor:   4.493


  76 in total

Review 1.  Diffusion MR imaging for monitoring of treatment response.

Authors:  Anwar R Padhani; Dow-Mu Koh
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 2.266

2.  Computed tomography perfusion imaging for therapeutic assessment: has it come of age as a biomarker in oncology?

Authors:  Vicky Goh; Quan Sing Ng; Ken Miles
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 6.016

3.  To predict progression-free survival and overall survival in metastatic renal cancer treated with sorafenib: pilot study using dynamic contrast-enhanced Doppler ultrasound.

Authors:  Michele Lamuraglia; Bernard Escudier; Linda Chami; Brian Schwartz; Jérome Leclère; Alain Roche; Nathalie Lassau
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2006-09-11       Impact factor: 9.162

4.  Prognostic model for survival in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma: results from the international kidney cancer working group.

Authors:  Judith Manola; Patrick Royston; Paul Elson; Jennifer Bacik McCormack; Madhu Mazumdar; Sylvie Négrier; Bernard Escudier; Tim Eisen; Janice Dutcher; Michael Atkins; Daniel Y C Heng; Toni K Choueiri; Robert Motzer; Ronald Bukowski
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2011-08-09       Impact factor: 12.531

5.  Serum lactate dehydrogenase predicts for overall survival benefit in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma treated with inhibition of mammalian target of rapamycin.

Authors:  Andrew J Armstrong; Daniel J George; Susan Halabi
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-08-13       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  Novel oncologic drugs: what they do and how they affect images.

Authors:  Roberto García Figueiras; Anwar R Padhani; Vicky J Goh; Joan C Vilanova; Sandra Baleato González; Carmen Villalba Martín; Antonio Gómez Caamaño; Anaberta Bermúdez Naveira; Peter L Choyke
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2011 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 5.333

7.  Metastatic renal carcinoma: evaluation of antiangiogenic therapy with dynamic contrast-enhanced CT.

Authors:  Laure S Fournier; Stephane Oudard; Rokhaya Thiam; Ludovic Trinquart; Eugeniu Banu; Jacques Medioni; Daniel Balvay; Gilles Chatellier; Guy Frija; Charles A Cuenod
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2010-06-15       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 8.  Genitourinary imaging: part 2, role of imaging in medical management of advanced renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Atul B Shinagare; Katherine M Krajewski; Jyothi P Jagannathan; Nikhil H Ramaiya
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 9.  Do imaging biomarkers relate to outcome in patients treated with VEGF inhibitors?

Authors:  James P B O'Connor; Gordon C Jayson
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2012-10-23       Impact factor: 12.531

10.  New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1).

Authors:  E A Eisenhauer; P Therasse; J Bogaerts; L H Schwartz; D Sargent; R Ford; J Dancey; S Arbuck; S Gwyther; M Mooney; L Rubinstein; L Shankar; L Dodd; R Kaplan; D Lacombe; J Verweij
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 9.162

View more
  5 in total

1.  Translation in solid cancer: are size-based response criteria an anachronism?

Authors:  M Fernandes; D Rosel; J Brábek
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2014-07-30       Impact factor: 3.405

2.  SEOM clinical guidelines for the treatment of renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  J Bellmunt; J Puente; J Garcia de Muro; N Lainez; C Rodríguez; I Duran
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2014-10-02       Impact factor: 3.405

3.  A retrospective study of predictive factors for unexpectedly prolonged or shortened progression-free survival and overall survival among patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma who received first-line targeted therapy.

Authors:  Sung Han Kim; Sohee Kim; Jungnam Joo; Ho Kyung Seo; Jae Young Joung; Kang Hyun Lee; Jinsoo Chung
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2016-08-02       Impact factor: 4.430

4.  Liver metastasis and Heng risk are prognostic factors in patients with non-nephrectomized synchronous metastatic renal cell carcinoma treated with systemic therapy.

Authors:  Sung Han Kim; Jung Kwon Kim; Eun Young Park; Jungnam Joo; Kang Hyun Lee; Ho Kyung Seo; Jae Young Joung; Jinsoo Chung
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-02-20       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Initial computed tomography imaging details during first-line systemic therapy is of significant prognostic value in patients with naïve, unresectable metastatic renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Sung Han Kim; Weon Seo Park; Sun Ho Kim; Ho Kyung Seo; Jae Young Joung; Kang Hyun Lee; Jinsoo Chung
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-05-31       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.