Literature DB >> 22080392

Can we predict pathologic complete response before surgery for locally advanced rectal cancer treated with preoperative chemoradiation therapy?

Li-Jen Kuo1, Jeng-Fong Chiou, Cheng-Jeng Tai, Chun-Chao Chang, Ching-Huei Kung, Sey-En Lin, Chin-Sheng Hung, Weu Wang, Ka-Wai Tam, Hung-Chia Lee, Hung-Hua Liang, Yu-Jia Chang, Po-Li Wei.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Pathologic complete response has been proven to have oncological benefits for locally advanced rectal cancer treated with chemoradiation therapy. The aims of this study are to analyze and determine the factors to predict pathologic complete response for patients treated with preoperative neoadjuvant therapy.
METHODS: Patients with biopsy-proven, locally advanced rectal cancer were treated neoadjuvantly followed by radical surgical resection. Tumors were re-assessed after completing chemoradiation, including pelvic magnetic resonance images, colonoscopic examination, and re-biopsy. The results of examination were compared with the final pathologic status.
RESULTS: A retrospective chart review of 166 patients was conducted. Twenty-five patients (15.1%) had pathologic complete response after chemoradiation. The 5-year overall survival rates were better in the complete response group than the residual tumor group (91.1% vs. 70.8%; P = 0.047), and there were also significant differences in the 5-year disease-free survival rates between these two groups (91.1% vs. 70.2%; P = 0.027). The prediction rates for pathologic complete response by re-biopsy, magnetic resonance images, and colonoscopy were 21.4%, 33.3%, and 53.8%, respectively. In addition, when we further combine the results of colonoscopic findings and re-biopsy, the prediction rate for pathologic complete response reached 77.8% (P = 0.009).
CONCLUSIONS: Combining the results of the re-biopsy and post-treatment colonoscopic findings, we can achieve a good prediction rate for pathologic complete response. Post-treatment magnetic resonance images are not useful tools in predicting tumor clearance following chemoradiation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22080392     DOI: 10.1007/s00384-011-1348-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis        ISSN: 0179-1958            Impact factor:   2.571


  36 in total

1.  Comparative study of transrectal ultrasonography, pelvic computerized tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging in preoperative staging of rectal cancer.

Authors:  N K Kim; M J Kim; S H Yun; S K Sohn; J S Min
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 4.585

2.  Prognostic value of pathologic complete response after neoadjuvant therapy in locally advanced rectal cancer: long-term analysis of 566 ypCR patients.

Authors:  Carlo Capirci; Vincenzo Valentini; Luca Cionini; Antonino De Paoli; Claus Rodel; Robert Glynne-Jones; Claudio Coco; Mario Romano; Giovanna Mantello; Silvia Palazzi; Falchetti Osti Mattia; Maria Luisa Friso; Domenico Genovesi; Cristiana Vidali; Maria Antonietta Gambacorta; Alberto Buffoli; Marco Lupattelli; Maria Silvia Favretto; Giuseppe La Torre
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2008-04-11       Impact factor: 7.038

3.  Patterns of failure and survival for nonoperative treatment of stage c0 distal rectal cancer following neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy.

Authors:  Angelita Habr-Gama; Rodrigo O Perez; Igor Proscurshim; Fábio G Campos; Wladimir Nadalin; Desiderio Kiss; Joaquim Gama-Rodrigues
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 4.  Morbidity and mortality following abdominoperineal resection for low rectal adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  P Luna-Pérez; S Rodríguez-Ramírez; J Vega; E Sandoval; S Labastida
Journal:  Rev Invest Clin       Date:  2001 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.451

5.  Preoperative 5-FU, low-dose leucovorin, and radiation therapy for locally advanced and unresectable rectal cancer.

Authors:  B D Minsky; A M Cohen; W E Enker; L Saltz; J G Guillem; P B Paty; D P Kelsen; N Kemeny; D Ilson; J Bass; J Conti
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  1997-01-15       Impact factor: 7.038

6.  The National Cancer Data Base report on patterns of care for adenocarcinoma of the rectum, 1985-95.

Authors:  J M Jessup; A K Stewart; H R Menck
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1998-12-01       Impact factor: 6.860

7.  Transrectal ultrasound and computed tomography in preoperative staging of lower rectal adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  S Goldman; H Arvidsson; U Norming; U Lagerstedt; I Magnusson; J Frisell
Journal:  Gastrointest Radiol       Date:  1991

8.  Can an FDG-PET/CT predict tumor clearance of the mesorectal fascia after preoperative chemoradiation of locally advanced rectal cancer?

Authors:  Roy F A Vliegen; Regina G Beets-Tan; Bart Vanhauten; Ann Driessen; Michel Oellers; Alfons G Kessels; Ann Arens; Geerard L Beets; Jeroen Buijsen; Angela van Baardwijk; Dirk de Ruysscher; Guido Lammering
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2008-09-19       Impact factor: 3.621

9.  Staging of rectal carcinoma: prospective comparison of endorectal US and CT.

Authors:  M D Rifkin; S M Ehrlich; G Marks
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1989-02       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  Sequential FDG-PET/CT reliably predicts response of locally advanced rectal cancer to neo-adjuvant chemo-radiation therapy.

Authors:  Carlo Capirci; Lucia Rampin; Paola A Erba; Fabrizio Galeotti; Giorgio Crepaldi; Elena Banti; Marcello Gava; Stefano Fanti; Giuliano Mariani; Pier Carlo Muzzio; Domenico Rubello
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2007-05-15       Impact factor: 9.236

View more
  19 in total

1.  Management of distal rectal cancer: results from a national survey.

Authors:  G Melotti; E De Antoni; A Habr-Gama; A Minicozzi
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2013-01-19

Review 2.  Update on advances and controversy in rectal cancer treatment.

Authors:  S Biondo; D Fraccalvieri; T Golda; R Frago; L Trenti; E Kreisler
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2016-01-12       Impact factor: 3.781

3.  The risk of nodal disease in patients with pathological complete responses after neoadjuvant chemoradiation for rectal cancer: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression.

Authors:  Ian Jun Yan Wee; Hai Man Cao; James Chi-Yong Ngu
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2019-07-04       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 4.  Overview of radiation therapy for treating rectal cancer.

Authors:  Bong-Hyeon Kye; Hyeon-Min Cho
Journal:  Ann Coloproctol       Date:  2014-08-26

5.  What does absence of lymph node in resected specimen mean after neoadjuvant chemoradiation for rectal cancer.

Authors:  Won-Suk Lee; Seok Ho Lee; Jeong-Heum Baek; Woon Kee Lee; Jung Nam Lee; Na Rae Kim; Yeon Ho Park
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2013-08-19       Impact factor: 3.481

Review 6.  Current approaches and challenges for monitoring treatment response in colon and rectal cancer.

Authors:  Elizabeth McKeown; Daniel W Nelson; Eric K Johnson; Justin A Maykel; Alexander Stojadinovic; Aviram Nissan; Itzhak Avital; Björn Ldm Brücher; Scott R Steele
Journal:  J Cancer       Date:  2014-01-01       Impact factor: 4.207

7.  Endoscopic Criteria for Evaluating Tumor Stage after Preoperative Chemoradiation Therapy in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer.

Authors:  Kyung Su Han; Dae Kyung Sohn; Dae Yong Kim; Byung Chang Kim; Chang Won Hong; Hee Jin Chang; Sun Young Kim; Ji Yeon Baek; Sung Chan Park; Min Ju Kim; Jae Hwan Oh
Journal:  Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2015-09-22       Impact factor: 4.679

8.  Future directions in combined modality therapy for rectal cancer: reevaluating the role of total mesorectal excision after chemoradiotherapy.

Authors:  Abhishek A Solanki; Daniel T Chang; Stanley L Liauw
Journal:  Onco Targets Ther       Date:  2013-08-14       Impact factor: 4.147

9.  Utility of rectoscopy in the assessment of response to neoadjuvant treatment for locally advanced rectal cancer.

Authors:  Victor Lopez-Lopez; Jesus Abrisqueta; Juan Lujan; Quiteria Hernandez; Akiko Ono; Pascual Parrilla
Journal:  Saudi J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.485

10.  The value of forceps biopsy and core needle biopsy in prediction of pathologic complete remission in locally advanced rectal cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy.

Authors:  Jing-Hua Tang; Xin An; Xi Lin; Yuan-Hong Gao; Guo-Chen Liu; Ling-Heng Kong; Zhi-Zhong Pan; Pei-Rong Ding
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2015-10-20
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.