Literature DB >> 9840542

The National Cancer Data Base report on patterns of care for adenocarcinoma of the rectum, 1985-95.

J M Jessup1, A K Stewart, H R Menck.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Commission on Cancer data from the National Cancer Data Base (NCDB) examining current time trends (1985-1995) in stage of disease, treatment patterns, and survival relating to patients with rectal adenocarcinoma are described in this report.
METHODS: Seven calls for data to hospital cancer registries across the U.S. have yielded a total of 5,850,000 cancer cases for the years 1985-1995 and include 20,461 rectal and rectosigmoid junction adenocarcinoma cases in 1985-1986, 36,007 cases in 1989-1990, and 42,069 cases in 1994-1995. These data represent 24.4%, 44.5%, and 52.5%, respectively, of the estimated cases of rectal and rectosigmoid adenocarcinoma cases diagnosed in the U.S. in each of the 3 respective time periods. Analysis of the data is limited to cases with American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) Stage I-IV disease.
RESULTS: Four trends were observed. 1) Stage I disease was diagnosed with decreasing frequency, decreasing from 37.1% of cases with known AJCC stage of disease in 1985-1986 to 33.8% in 1994-1995. 2) There was an increase in the frequency with which local excision was utilized as all or part of the primary treatment for Stage I disease. 3) Stage for stage, there was an increase in the frequency with which anterior/posterior resections were utilized and a corresponding decline in the use of abdominoperineal resections. 4) Multimodal treatment regimens are being used with greater frequency, particularly in patients with Stage II and III disease.
CONCLUSIONS: The NCDB data have important implications for analyzing cancer treatment and outcome in the U.S. These data suggest that rectal adenocarcinoma is being diagnosed at a later stage, especially among the young and African Americans. The guidelines for colorectal carcinoma screening issued by the American Cancer Society and the American Gastroenterological Association should be promoted more vigorously to increase the proportion of patients presenting with early stage disease and improve overall survival. The increased use of multimodal therapy for the treatment of Stage II and III disease continues.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9840542     DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0142(19981201)83:11<2408::aid-cncr22>3.0.co;2-g

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  15 in total

1.  Hospital variation in sphincter preservation for elderly rectal cancer patients.

Authors:  Christopher M Dodgion; Bridget A Neville; Stuart R Lipsitz; Deborah Schrag; Elizabeth Breen; Michael J Zinner; Caprice C Greenberg
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2014-03-22       Impact factor: 2.192

Review 2.  Development and progression of colorectal neoplasia.

Authors:  Upender Manne; Chandrakumar Shanmugam; Venkat R Katkoori; Harvey L Bumpers; William E Grizzle
Journal:  Cancer Biomark       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 4.388

3.  Can we predict pathologic complete response before surgery for locally advanced rectal cancer treated with preoperative chemoradiation therapy?

Authors:  Li-Jen Kuo; Jeng-Fong Chiou; Cheng-Jeng Tai; Chun-Chao Chang; Ching-Huei Kung; Sey-En Lin; Chin-Sheng Hung; Weu Wang; Ka-Wai Tam; Hung-Chia Lee; Hung-Hua Liang; Yu-Jia Chang; Po-Li Wei
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2011-11-15       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  Histologic response after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced rectal adenocarcinoma: experience from Sudan.

Authors:  Ahmed Abd Elrahman Abdalla; Awad Ali M Alawad; Hussein Abdalla M Ali
Journal:  Afr Health Sci       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 0.927

5.  Stage-specific survival differences associated with postoperative radiotherapy for gastrointestinal cancers.

Authors:  John S Moody; Stephen M Sawrie; Kevin R Kozak; John P Plastaras; George Howard; James A Bonner
Journal:  J Gastrointest Cancer       Date:  2009-03-18

Review 6.  The effect of hospital and surgeon volume on outcomes for rectal cancer surgery.

Authors:  Talya Salz; Robert S Sandler
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2008-10-01       Impact factor: 11.382

7.  Is the increasing rate of local excision for stage I rectal cancer in the United States justified?: a nationwide cohort study from the National Cancer Database.

Authors:  Y Nancy You; Nancy N Baxter; Andrew Stewart; Heidi Nelson
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  Neoadjuvant oxaliplatin and 5-fluorouracil with concurrent radiotherapy in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer: a single-institution experience.

Authors:  D Greto; F Paiar; C Saieva; A Galardi; M Mangoni; L Livi; B Agresti; D Franceschini; P Bonomo; V Scotti; B Detti; F Tonelli; A Valeri; L Messerini; G Biti
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2013-01-28       Impact factor: 3.469

9.  High preoperative serum globulin in rectal cancer treated with neoadjunctive chemoradiation therapy is a risk factor for poor outcome.

Authors:  Qingguo Li; Xianke Meng; Lei Liang; Ye Xu; Guoxiang Cai; Sanjun Cai
Journal:  Am J Cancer Res       Date:  2015-08-15       Impact factor: 6.166

10.  Metastatic colorectal cancer to a primary thyroid cancer.

Authors:  Martin H Cherk; Maggie Moore; Jonathan Serpell; Sarah Swain; Duncan J Topliss
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2008-11-11       Impact factor: 2.754

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.