Literature DB >> 22080055

ERG immunohistochemistry is not predictive for PSA recurrence, local recurrence or overall survival after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer.

A Marije Hoogland1, Guido Jenster, Wytske M van Weerden, Jan Trapman, Theo van der Kwast, Monique J Roobol, Fritz H Schröder, Mark F Wildhagen, Geert Jlh van Leenders.   

Abstract

In prostate cancer genomic rearrangements involving genes encoding ETS transcription factors are commonly present, with androgen-regulated transmembrane protease, serine 2 (TMPRSS2)-v-ets erythroblastosis virus E26 oncogen homologue (ERG) gene fusion occurring in 40-70%. Studies on the predictive value of ERG rearrangement as detected by in-situ hybridization or polymerase chain reaction have resulted in varying outcomes. The objective of this study was to correlate immunohistochemical ERG protein expression with clinico-pathological parameters at radical prostatectomy specimens, and to determine its predictive value for postoperative disease recurrence and progression in a prostate cancer screening cohort. Since androgen receptor is downregulated by ERG in cell lines, we also compared the expression of respective proteins. We selected 481 participants from the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer treated by radical prostatectomy for prostate adenocarcinoma. A tissue microarray was constructed containing representative cores of all prostate cancer specimens as well as 22 xenografts and seven cell lines. Immunohistochemical expression of ERG and androgen receptor was correlated with prostate-specific antigen (PSA), Gleason sum, pT-stage, surgical margins, biochemical recurrence, local recurrence, overall death and disease-specific death. ERG expression was detected in 284 patients (65%). Expression occurred significantly more frequent in patients with PSA ≤10 ng/ml (P=0.024). There was no significant association between ERG and Gleason sum, pT-stage or surgical margin status. PSA (P=0.011), Gleason sum (P=0.003), pT-stage (P=0.001) and surgical margin status (P<0.001) all had independent value for postoperative biochemical recurrence, while positive surgical margin (P=0.021) was the only independent predictor for local recurrence. ERG protein expression did not have prognostic value for the clinical end points in uni- and multivariate analyses. A positive correlation existed between ERG and androgen receptor expression in single tissue cores (P<0.001). In conclusion, immunohistochemical ERG expression has no predictive value for prostate cancer recurrence or progression after radical prostatectomy. Increasing ERG levels are associated with the upregulation of androgen receptor expression in clinical specimens.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22080055     DOI: 10.1038/modpathol.2011.176

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mod Pathol        ISSN: 0893-3952            Impact factor:   7.842


  53 in total

1.  Targeted radiosensitization of ETS fusion-positive prostate cancer through PARP1 inhibition.

Authors:  Sumin Han; J Chad Brenner; Aaron Sabolch; Will Jackson; Corey Speers; Kari Wilder-Romans; Karen E Knudsen; Theodore S Lawrence; Arul M Chinnaiyan; Felix Y Feng
Journal:  Neoplasia       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 5.715

2.  High alpha-methylacyl-CoA racemase (AMACR) is associated with ERG expression and with adverse clinical outcome in patients with localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  Adrian Box; Mohammed Alshalalfa; Samar A Hegazy; Bryan Donnelly; Tarek A Bismar
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2016-06-07

3.  The TMPRSS2:ERG rearrangement, ERG expression, and prostate cancer outcomes: a cohort study and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Andreas Pettersson; Rebecca E Graff; Scott R Bauer; Michael J Pitt; Rosina T Lis; Edward C Stack; Neil E Martin; Lauren Kunz; Kathryn L Penney; Azra H Ligon; Catherine Suppan; Richard Flavin; Howard D Sesso; Jennifer R Rider; Christopher Sweeney; Meir J Stampfer; Michelangelo Fiorentino; Philip W Kantoff; Martin G Sanda; Edward L Giovannucci; Eric L Ding; Massimo Loda; Lorelei A Mucci
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2012-06-26       Impact factor: 4.254

4.  Genetic profiling to determine risk of relapse-free survival in high-risk localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  Christine M Barnett; Michael C Heinrich; Jeong Lim; Dylan Nelson; Carol Beadling; Andrea Warrick; Tanaya Neff; Celestia S Higano; Mark Garzotto; David Qian; Christopher L Corless; George V Thomas; Tomasz M Beer
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2013-12-18       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 5.  Clinically relevant genetic characterization of prostate tumors: how close are we to the goal?

Authors:  Yuri Tolkach; Florian Imkamp; Konstantin Godin; Hendrik Van Poppel
Journal:  Korean J Urol       Date:  2015-01-30

Review 6.  Ethnicity and ERG frequency in prostate cancer.

Authors:  Jason Sedarsky; Michael Degon; Shiv Srivastava; Albert Dobi
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2017-09-05       Impact factor: 14.432

7.  C-MYC, HIF-1α, ERG, TKT, and GSTP1: an Axis in Prostate Cancer?

Authors:  L Boldrini; R Bartoletti; M Giordano; F Manassero; C Selli; M Panichi; L Galli; F Farci; P Faviana
Journal:  Pathol Oncol Res       Date:  2018-10-25       Impact factor: 3.201

8.  Loss of PTEN expression in ERG-negative prostate cancer predicts secondary therapies and leads to shorter disease-specific survival time after radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Kanerva Lahdensuo; Andrew Erickson; Irena Saarinen; Heikki Seikkula; Johan Lundin; Mikael Lundin; Stig Nordling; Anna Bützow; Hanna Vasarainen; Peter J Boström; Pekka Taimen; Antti Rannikko; Tuomas Mirtti
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2016-08-26       Impact factor: 7.842

9.  Prognostic value of ERG oncoprotein in prostate cancer recurrence and cause-specific mortality.

Authors:  E Sophie Spencer; Richard B Johnston; Ryan R Gordon; Jared M Lucas; Cigdem Himmetoglu Ussakli; Antonio Hurtado-Coll; Shiv Srivastava; Peter S Nelson; Christopher R Porter
Journal:  Prostate       Date:  2013-01-17       Impact factor: 4.104

10.  Immunohistochemical profile of ductal adenocarcinoma of the prostate.

Authors:  Amanda H Seipel; Hemamali Samaratunga; Brett Delahunt; Fredrik Wiklund; Peter Wiklund; Johan Lindberg; Henrik Grönberg; Lars Egevad
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2014-07-25       Impact factor: 4.064

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.