Literature DB >> 25059847

Immunohistochemical profile of ductal adenocarcinoma of the prostate.

Amanda H Seipel1, Hemamali Samaratunga, Brett Delahunt, Fredrik Wiklund, Peter Wiklund, Johan Lindberg, Henrik Grönberg, Lars Egevad.   

Abstract

Ductal adenocarcinoma of the prostate (DAC) is considered to be an aggressive subtype of prostate cancer with greater risk of progression than acinar adenocarcinoma (AC). It has been debated whether DAC is a distinct subtype or a morphological variant of AC. Our aim was to examine the protein expression of DAC and to compare the results with AC. A tissue microarray was constructed from 60 DAC and 46 AC matched by Gleason score. The slides were stained for 28 immunomarkers (estrogen, progesterone and androgen receptor, prolactin, PSA, prostein, PSMA, PSAP, CDX2, lysozyme, villin, monoclonal CEA, CK7, CK20, HMWCK, p63, p504s, c-myc, EGFR, Ki-67, p16, p21, p27, p53, PTEN, ERG, PAX-2, and PAX-8). HMWCK was positive in 8.5 % of DAC, but negative in all cases of AC (p = 0.045). p16 was positive in 53.3 % of DAC and in 26.1 % of AC (p = 0.005). p53 was positive in 42.4 % of DAC and 26.7 % of AC (p = 0.031). A distinct patchy positivity of CK20 was seen in 23.7 % of DAC, and this pattern was also seen in 9.1 % of AC (p = 0.047). Villin was positive in 3.4 % of DAC while expression was negative in AC. Ki-67 labeling index was significantly higher in DAC than in AC (mean 9.2 % [95 % CI 6.4-12.0] and 2.6 % [1.9-3.4], p < 0.001). While there is some overlap in the immunohistochemical expression of DAC and AC, the differences between these two morphotypes of prostatic carcinoma are consistent with DAC having a more aggressive phenotype than AC.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25059847     DOI: 10.1007/s00428-014-1636-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Virchows Arch        ISSN: 0945-6317            Impact factor:   4.064


  35 in total

1.  Ductal adenocarcinoma of the prostate.

Authors:  Johann D Hertel; Peter A Humphrey
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2011-05-20       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 2.  Prostatic ductal adenocarcinoma: a mini review.

Authors:  Jonathan I Epstein
Journal:  Med Princ Pract       Date:  2009-12-09       Impact factor: 1.927

3.  Improved differentiation between ductal and acinar prostate cancer using three-dimensional histology and biomarkers.

Authors:  Miklós Tarján; Hsiu-Hsi Chen; Tibor Tot; Wendy Wu; Anna Lenngren; Peter B Dean; László Tabár
Journal:  Scand J Urol Nephrol       Date:  2012-04-23

4.  Diagnostic criteria for ductal adenocarcinoma of the prostate: interobserver variability among 20 expert uropathologists.

Authors:  Amanda H Seipel; Brett Delahunt; Hemamali Samaratunga; Mahul Amin; Joel Barton; Daniel M Berney; Athanase Billis; Liang Cheng; Eva Comperat; Andrew Evans; Samson W Fine; David Grignon; Peter A Humphrey; Cristina Magi-Galluzzi; Rodolfo Montironi; Isabell Sesterhenn; John R Srigley; Kiril Trpkov; Theo van der Kwast; Murali Varma; Ming Zhou; Amar Ahmad; Sue Moss; Lars Egevad
Journal:  Histopathology       Date:  2014-04-03       Impact factor: 5.087

Review 5.  Hallmarks of senescence in carcinogenesis and cancer therapy.

Authors:  Jerry W Shay; Igor B Roninson
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2004-04-12       Impact factor: 9.867

6.  Ductal carcinoma of the prostate shows a different immunophenotype from high grade acinar cancer.

Authors:  Pauline Jardel; Celine Debiais; Julie Godet; Jacques Irani; Gaelle Fromont
Journal:  Histopathology       Date:  2013-05-23       Impact factor: 5.087

7.  Gene expression profiles of ductal versus acinar adenocarcinoma of the prostate.

Authors:  Souzan Sanati; Mark A Watson; Andrea L Salavaggione; Peter A Humphrey
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2009-07-24       Impact factor: 7.842

8.  Prostatic adenocarcinoma with endometrioid features. Clinical, pathologic, and ultrastructural findings.

Authors:  D G Bostwick; R W Kindrachuk; R V Rouse
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  1985-08       Impact factor: 6.394

9.  Immunohistochemical verification of ductal differentiation in prostate cancer.

Authors:  Miklós Tarján; Anna Lenngren; Dan Hellberg; Tibor Tot
Journal:  APMIS       Date:  2012-01-12       Impact factor: 3.205

10.  Ki-67 and outcome in clinically localised prostate cancer: analysis of conservatively treated prostate cancer patients from the Trans-Atlantic Prostate Group study.

Authors:  D M Berney; A Gopalan; S Kudahetti; G Fisher; L Ambroisine; C S Foster; V Reuter; J Eastham; H Moller; M W Kattan; W Gerald; C Cooper; P Scardino; J Cuzick
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2009-03-24       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  7 in total

1.  PTEN loss and ERG protein expression are infrequent in prostatic ductal adenocarcinomas and concurrent acinar carcinomas.

Authors:  Carlos L Morais; Mehsati Herawi; Antoun Toubaji; Roula Albadine; Jessica Hicks; George J Netto; Angelo M De Marzo; Jonathan I Epstein; Tamara L Lotan
Journal:  Prostate       Date:  2015-07-14       Impact factor: 4.104

Review 2.  The update of prostatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Tantan Liu; Yingmei Wang; Ru Zhou; Haiyang Li; Hong Cheng; Jing Zhang
Journal:  Chin J Cancer Res       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 5.087

3.  Integrative Genomic Analysis of Coincident Cancer Foci Implicates CTNNB1 and PTEN Alterations in Ductal Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Marc Gillard; Justin Lack; Andrea Pontier; Divya Gandla; David Hatcher; Adam G Sowalsky; Jose Rodriguez-Nieves; Donald Vander Griend; Gladell Paner; David VanderWeele
Journal:  Eur Urol Focus       Date:  2017-12-08

Review 4.  Optimizing the diagnosis and management of ductal prostate cancer.

Authors:  Weranja Ranasinghe; Daniel D Shapiro; Miao Zhang; Tharakeswara Bathala; Nora Navone; Timothy C Thompson; Bradley Broom; Ana Aparicio; Shi-Ming Tu; Chad Tang; John W Davis; Louis Pisters; Brian F Chapin
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2021-04-06       Impact factor: 14.432

5.  First case of ductal adenocarcinoma of the prostate with MAP3K1 homozygous deletion.

Authors:  Kazunori Shojo; Takeo Kosaka; Kohei Nakamura; Hiroshi Hongo; Hiroaki Kobayashi; Shuji Mikami; Hiroshi Nishihara; Mototsugu Oya
Journal:  IJU Case Rep       Date:  2021-03-17

6.  Lysozyme gene treatment in testosterone induced benign prostate hyperplasia rat model and comparasion of its' effectiveness with botulinum toxin injection.

Authors:  Osman Ergün; Pinar Aslan Koşar; İbrahim Onaran; Hakan Darici; Alim Koşar
Journal:  Int Braz J Urol       Date:  2017 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.541

7.  HoxB13 expression in ductal type adenocarcinoma of prostate: clinicopathologic characteristics and its utility as potential diagnostic marker.

Authors:  Cheol Keun Park; Su-Jin Shin; Yoon Ah Cho; Jin Woo Joo; Nam Hoon Cho
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-12-27       Impact factor: 4.379

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.