Literature DB >> 22079448

Neural insensitivity to upticks in value is associated with the disposition effect.

Andrew M Brooks1, C Monica Capra, Gregory S Berns.   

Abstract

The disposition effect is a phenomenon in which investors hold onto losing assets longer than they hold onto gaining assets. In this study, we used functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to measure the response of valuation regions in the brain during the decision to keep or to sell an asset that followed a random walk in price. The most common explanation for the disposition effect is preference-based: namely, that people are risk-averse over gains and risk-seeking over losses. This explanation would predict correlations between individuals' risk-preferences, the magnitude of their disposition effect, and activation in valuation structures of the brain. We did not observe these correlations. Nor did we find evidence for a realization utility explanation, which would predict differential responses in valuation regions during the decision to sell versus keep an asset that correlated with the magnitude of the disposition effect. Instead, we found an attenuated ventral striatum response to upticks in value below the purchase price in some individuals with a large disposition effect. Given the role of the striatum in signaling prediction error, the blunted striatal response is consistent with the expectation that an asset will rise when it is below the purchase price, thus spurring loss-holding behavior. This suggests that for some individuals, the disposition effect is likely driven by a belief that the asset will eventually return to the purchase price, also known as mean reversion.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22079448      PMCID: PMC3288460          DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.10.081

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  24 in total

1.  Anticipation of increasing monetary reward selectively recruits nucleus accumbens.

Authors:  B Knutson; C M Adams; G W Fong; D Hommer
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2001-08-15       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  The neural basis of financial risk taking.

Authors:  Camelia M Kuhnen; Brian Knutson
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2005-09-01       Impact factor: 17.173

Review 3.  Reward-related responses in the human striatum.

Authors:  Mauricio R Delgado
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2007-03-07       Impact factor: 5.691

4.  Increased activation in the right insula during risk-taking decision making is related to harm avoidance and neuroticism.

Authors:  Martin P Paulus; Corianne Rogalsky; Alan Simmons; Justin S Feinstein; Murray B Stein
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 5.  A neural substrate of prediction and reward.

Authors:  W Schultz; P Dayan; P R Montague
Journal:  Science       Date:  1997-03-14       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Predictability modulates human brain response to reward.

Authors:  G S Berns; S M McClure; G Pagnoni; P R Montague
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2001-04-15       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Temporal prediction errors in a passive learning task activate human striatum.

Authors:  Samuel M McClure; Gregory S Berns; P Read Montague
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2003-04-24       Impact factor: 17.173

8.  Separate neural mechanisms underlie choices and strategic preferences in risky decision making.

Authors:  Vinod Venkatraman; John W Payne; James R Bettman; Mary Frances Luce; Scott A Huettel
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2009-05-28       Impact factor: 17.173

Review 9.  Dopamine signals for reward value and risk: basic and recent data.

Authors:  Wolfram Schultz
Journal:  Behav Brain Funct       Date:  2010-04-23       Impact factor: 3.759

10.  Neural correlates of value, risk, and risk aversion contributing to decision making under risk.

Authors:  George I Christopoulos; Philippe N Tobler; Peter Bossaerts; Raymond J Dolan; Wolfram Schultz
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-10-07       Impact factor: 6.167

View more
  2 in total

1.  Psychophysiological correlates of the disposition effect.

Authors:  Marco Goulart; Newton Da Costa; Andre Santos; Emilio Takase; Sergio Da Silva
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-01-23       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 2.  An ALE Meta-Analysis on Investment Decision-Making.

Authors:  Elena Ortiz-Teran; Ibai Diez; Joaquin Lopez-Pascual
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2021-03-21
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.