Literature DB >> 12718866

Temporal prediction errors in a passive learning task activate human striatum.

Samuel M McClure1, Gregory S Berns, P Read Montague.   

Abstract

Functional MRI experiments in human subjects strongly suggest that the striatum participates in processing information about the predictability of rewarding stimuli. However, stimuli can be unpredictable in character (what stimulus arrives next), unpredictable in time (when the stimulus arrives), and unpredictable in amount (how much arrives). These variables have not been dissociated in previous imaging work in humans, thus conflating possible interpretations of the kinds of expectation errors driving the measured brain responses. Using a passive conditioning task and fMRI in human subjects, we show that positive and negative prediction errors in reward delivery time correlate with BOLD changes in human striatum, with the strongest activation lateralized to the left putamen. For the negative prediction error, the brain response was elicited by expectations only and not by stimuli presented directly; that is, we measured the brain response to nothing delivered (juice expected but not delivered) contrasted with nothing delivered (nothing expected).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12718866     DOI: 10.1016/s0896-6273(03)00154-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuron        ISSN: 0896-6273            Impact factor:   17.173


  355 in total

1.  Testing the reward prediction error hypothesis with an axiomatic model.

Authors:  Robb B Rutledge; Mark Dean; Andrew Caplin; Paul W Glimcher
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-10-06       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Reward Prediction Error Signals are Meta-Representational.

Authors:  Nicholas Shea
Journal:  Nous       Date:  2012-06-21

3.  Neural insensitivity to upticks in value is associated with the disposition effect.

Authors:  Andrew M Brooks; C Monica Capra; Gregory S Berns
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2011-11-04       Impact factor: 6.556

4.  Dissociable neural representations of reinforcement and belief prediction errors underlie strategic learning.

Authors:  Lusha Zhu; Kyle E Mathewson; Ming Hsu
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-01-18       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 5.  Imaging models of valuation during social interaction in humans.

Authors:  Kenneth T Kishida; P Read Montague
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2012-04-14       Impact factor: 13.382

6.  Adaptive coding of reward prediction errors is gated by striatal coupling.

Authors:  Soyoung Q Park; Thorsten Kahnt; Deborah Talmi; Jörg Rieskamp; Raymond J Dolan; Hauke R Heekeren
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-02-27       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Dissociable neural representations of future reward magnitude and delay during temporal discounting.

Authors:  Kacey Ballard; Brian Knutson
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2008-11-24       Impact factor: 6.556

8.  Individual differences in dopamine D2 receptor availability correlate with reward valuation.

Authors:  Linh C Dang; Gregory R Samanez-Larkin; Jaime J Castrellon; Scott F Perkins; Ronald L Cowan; David H Zald
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 3.282

9.  Computational substrates of norms and their violations during social exchange.

Authors:  Ting Xiang; Terry Lohrenz; P Read Montague
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-01-16       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 10.  The social brain and reward: social information processing in the human striatum.

Authors:  Jamil P Bhanji; Mauricio R Delgado
Journal:  Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci       Date:  2013-10-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.