Literature DB >> 22077694

Evaluation of GSTP1 and APC methylation as indicators for repeat biopsy in a high-risk cohort of men with negative initial prostate biopsies.

Bruce J Trock1, Michelle J Brotzman, Leslie A Mangold, Joseph W Bigley, Jonathan I Epstein, David McLeod, Eric A Klein, J Stephen Jones, Songbai Wang, Theresa McAskill, Jyoti Mehrotra, Bhargavi Raghavan, Alan W Partin.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Study Type - Diagnostic (exploratory cohort) Level of Evidence 2b What's known on the subject? and What does the study add? Hypermethylation of genes such as glutathione-S-transferase P1 (GSTP1) and adenomatous polyposis coli (APC) occurs with high frequency in prostate tumour tissue but is much less common in the benign prostate; however, the potential value of gene methylation biomarkers as an adjunct to biopsy histopathology has had little study. When measured in histologically benign prostate biopsy tissue, APC gene hypermethylation was found to have high negative predictive value and high sensitivity. GSTP1 hypermethylation was found to have lower performance than APC.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the performance of DNA methylation biomarkers in the setting of repeat biopsy in men with an initially negative prostate biopsy but a high index of suspicion for missed prostate cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We prospectively evaluated 86 men with an initial histologically negative prostate biopsy and high-risk features. All men underwent repeat 12-core ultrasonography-guided biopsy. DNA methylation of glutathione-S-transferase P1 (GSTP1) and adenomatous polyposis coli (APC) was determined using tissue from the initially negative biopsy and compared with histology of the repeat biopsy. The primary outcome was the relative negative predictive value (NPV) of APC compared with GSTP1, and its 95% confidence interval (CI).
RESULTS: On repeat biopsy, 21/86 (24%) men had prostate cancer. APC and GSTP1 methylation ratios below the threshold (predicting no cancer) produced a NPV of 0.96 and 0.80, respectively. The relative NPV was 1.2 (95% CI: 1.06-1.36), indicating APC has significantly higher NPV. Methylation ratios above the threshold yielded a sensitivity of 0.95 for APC and 0.43 for GSTP1. Combining both methylation markers produced a performance similar to that of APC alone. APC methylation patterns were consistent with a possible field effect or occurrence early in carcinogenesis.
CONCLUSIONS: APC methylation provided a very high NPV with a low percentage of false-negatives, in the first prospective study to evaluate performance of DNA methylation markers in a clinical cohort of men undergoing repeat biopsy. The potential of APC methylation to reduce unnecessary repeat biopsies warrants validation in a larger prospective cohort.
© 2011 THE AUTHORS. BJU INTERNATIONAL © 2011 BJU INTERNATIONAL.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22077694      PMCID: PMC3397791          DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2011.10718.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJU Int        ISSN: 1464-4096            Impact factor:   5.588


  31 in total

1.  Comparing the predictive values of diagnostic tests: sample size and analysis for paired study designs.

Authors:  Chaya S Moskowitz; Margaret S Pepe
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 2.486

2.  The inconsistency of "optimal" cutpoints obtained using two criteria based on the receiver operating characteristic curve.

Authors:  Neil J Perkins; Enrique F Schisterman
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2006-01-12       Impact factor: 4.897

3.  Predictors of subsequent prostate cancer in men with a prostate specific antigen of 2.6 to 4.0 ng/ml and an initially negative biopsy.

Authors:  Scott E Eggener; Kimberly A Roehl; William J Catalona
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 7.450

4.  The proportion of cores with high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia on extended-pattern needle biopsy is significantly associated with prostate cancer on site-directed repeat biopsy.

Authors:  Ardavan Akhavan; Jonathan D Keith; Sheldon I Bastacky; Chao Cai; Yun Wang; Joel B Nelson
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 5.588

Review 5.  Use of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) isoforms for the detection of prostate cancer in men with a PSA level of 2-10 ng/ml: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Andrew W Roddam; Michael J Duffy; Freddie C Hamdy; Anthony Milford Ward; Julietta Patnick; Christopher P Price; Janet Rimmer; Cathie Sturgeon; Peter White; Naomi E Allen
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 20.096

6.  Methylation analysis of BRCA1, RASSF1, GSTP1 and EPHB2 promoters in prostate biopsies according to different degrees of malignancy.

Authors:  Nadège Rabiau; Mohamed Oury Thiam; Samir Satih; Laurent Guy; Jean-Louis Kemeny; Jean-Paul Boiteux; Luc Fontana; Yves-Jean Bignon; Dominique Bernard-Gallon
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2009 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.155

7.  High promoter methylation levels of APC predict poor prognosis in sextant biopsies from prostate cancer patients.

Authors:  Rui Henrique; Franclim R Ribeiro; Daniel Fonseca; Mohammad O Hoque; André L Carvalho; Vera L Costa; Mafalda Pinto; Jorge Oliveira; Manuel R Teixeira; David Sidransky; Carmen Jerónimo
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2007-10-15       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 8.  Prostate needle biopsies containing prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia or atypical foci suspicious for carcinoma: implications for patient care.

Authors:  Jonathan I Epstein; Mehsati Herawi
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 7.450

9.  Significance of atypical and suspicious small acinar proliferations, and high grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia on prostate biopsy: implications for cancer detection and biopsy strategy.

Authors:  Christopher R Girasole; Michael S Cookson; Mathew J Putzi; Sam S Chang; Joseph A Smith; Nancy Wells; Jonathan R Oppenheimer; Scott B Shappell
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 7.450

10.  Quantitative, spatial resolution of the epigenetic field effect in prostate cancer.

Authors:  Jyoti Mehrotra; Shobha Varde; Haiying Wang; Hsiling Chiu; Janet Vargo; Karen Gray; Raymond B Nagle; Jaclyn R Neri; Abhijit Mazumder
Journal:  Prostate       Date:  2008-02-01       Impact factor: 4.104

View more
  35 in total

Review 1.  Prostate Cancer Epigenetics: From Basic Mechanisms to Clinical Implications.

Authors:  Srinivasan Yegnasubramanian; Angelo M De Marzo; William G Nelson
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med       Date:  2019-04-01       Impact factor: 6.915

Review 2.  [Molecular biomarkers and prognostic factors for prostate cancer].

Authors:  A Kretschmer; Y Tolkach; J Ellinger; G Kristiansen
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 3.  Clinically relevant genetic characterization of prostate tumors: how close are we to the goal?

Authors:  Yuri Tolkach; Florian Imkamp; Konstantin Godin; Hendrik Van Poppel
Journal:  Korean J Urol       Date:  2015-01-30

Review 4.  Functional magnetic resonance imaging and molecular pathology at the crossroad of the management of early prostate cancer.

Authors:  Raphaele Renard-Penna; Geraldine Cancel-Tassin; Eva Comperat; Morgan Roupret; Pierre Mozer; Olivier Cussenot
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2015-05-06       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 5.  Risk stratification in prostate cancer screening.

Authors:  Monique J Roobol; Sigrid V Carlsson
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2012-12-18       Impact factor: 14.432

6.  Budget impact model: epigenetic assay can help avoid unnecessary repeated prostate biopsies and reduce healthcare spending.

Authors:  Wade Aubry; Robert Lieberthal; Arnold Willis; Grant Bagley; Simon M Willis; Andrew Layton
Journal:  Am Health Drug Benefits       Date:  2013-01

7.  Reduced Rate of Repeated Prostate Biopsies Observed in ConfirmMDx Clinical Utility Field Study.

Authors:  Kirk J Wojno; Frank J Costa; Robert J Cornell; Jeffrey D Small; Erik Pasin; Wim Van Criekinge; Joseph W Bigley; Leander Van Neste
Journal:  Am Health Drug Benefits       Date:  2014-05

8.  Using the epigenetic field defect to detect prostate cancer in biopsy negative patients.

Authors:  Matthew Truong; Bing Yang; Andrew Livermore; Jennifer Wagner; Puspha Weeratunga; Wei Huang; Rajiv Dhir; Joel Nelson; Daniel W Lin; David F Jarrard
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2012-11-15       Impact factor: 7.450

9.  Methylation of the RARB gene increases prostate cancer risk in black Americans.

Authors:  Deliang Tang; Oleksandr N Kryvenko; Nicoleta Mitrache; Kieu C Do; Michelle Jankowski; Dhananjay A Chitale; Sheri Trudeau; Andrew Rundle; Steven A Belinsky; Benjamin A Rybicki
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2013-01-30       Impact factor: 7.450

10.  Clinical validation of an epigenetic assay to predict negative histopathological results in repeat prostate biopsies.

Authors:  Alan W Partin; Leander Van Neste; Eric A Klein; Leonard S Marks; Jason R Gee; Dean A Troyer; Kimberly Rieger-Christ; J Stephen Jones; Cristina Magi-Galluzzi; Leslie A Mangold; Bruce J Trock; Raymond S Lance; Joseph W Bigley; Wim Van Criekinge; Jonathan I Epstein
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2014-04-18       Impact factor: 7.450

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.