Literature DB >> 16006880

Predictors of subsequent prostate cancer in men with a prostate specific antigen of 2.6 to 4.0 ng/ml and an initially negative biopsy.

Scott E Eggener1, Kimberly A Roehl, William J Catalona.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Almost 75% of men with a prostate specific antigen (PSA) of 2.6 to 4.0 ng/ml have no evidence of prostate cancer on biopsy. Deciding whether and when to repeat the biopsy is challenging. We determined if patient specific variables might identify men at increased risk for the subsequent detection of prostate cancer.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We analyzed the records of 24,893 men from a community based prostate cancer screening study. Our study group consisted of 1,202 men with PSA 2.6 to 4.0 ng/ml and a previously negative prostate biopsy. Patient specific variables were analyzed for their value in predicting a future diagnosis of prostate cancer.
RESULTS: Of 1,011 men with adequate followup 136 (13.5%) were subsequently diagnosed with prostate cancer. Mean followup +/- SD in men without prostate cancer was 72 +/- 36 months. Prostate cancer was subsequently diagnosed in 35% of men with high grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (HGPIN) on initial biopsy (p <0.0001), in 18% with abnormal or suspicious digital rectal examination (DRE) (p = 0.02) and 16% with an annual PSA velocity of 0 ng/ml (p = 0.002). Multivariate analysis identified HGPIN, initial PSA 3.6 to 4.0 ng/ml, abnormal DRE, family history of prostate cancer and annual PSA velocity 0 ng/ml as predictors of prostate cancer.
CONCLUSIONS: Men with a PSA of 2.6 to 4.0 ng/ml and negative biopsy should be advised to undergo repeat biopsy if they have HGPIN, initial PSA 3.6 to 4.0 ng/ml, abnormal DRE, a family history of prostate cancer or a PSA velocity of 0 ng/ml or greater.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16006880     DOI: 10.1097/01.ju.0000165203.40973.0f

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  11 in total

1.  Evaluation of GSTP1 and APC methylation as indicators for repeat biopsy in a high-risk cohort of men with negative initial prostate biopsies.

Authors:  Bruce J Trock; Michelle J Brotzman; Leslie A Mangold; Joseph W Bigley; Jonathan I Epstein; David McLeod; Eric A Klein; J Stephen Jones; Songbai Wang; Theresa McAskill; Jyoti Mehrotra; Bhargavi Raghavan; Alan W Partin
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2011-11-11       Impact factor: 5.588

2.  Prostate specific antigen velocity does not aid prostate cancer detection in men with prior negative biopsy.

Authors:  Andrew J Vickers; Tineke Wolters; Caroline J Savage; Angel M Cronin; M Frank O'Brien; Monique J Roobol; Gunnar Aus; Peter T Scardino; Jonas Hugosson; Fritz H Schröder; Hans Lilja
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 7.450

3.  Risk factors for prostate cancer detection after a negative biopsy: a novel multivariable longitudinal approach.

Authors:  Peter H Gann; Angela Fought; Ryan Deaton; William J Catalona; Edward Vonesh
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-02-22       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  Prostate-specific antigen velocity risk count assessment: a new concept for detection of life-threatening prostate cancer during window of curability.

Authors:  H Ballentine Carter; Anna Kettermann; Luigi Ferrucci; Patricia Landis; E Jeffrey Metter
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 2.649

5.  The Role of TURP in the Detection of Prostate Cancer in BPH Patients with Previously Negative Prostate Biopsy.

Authors:  Dae Keun Kim; Sang Jin Kim; Hong Sang Moon; Sung Yul Park; Yong Tae Kim; Hong Yong Choi; Tchun Yong Lee; Hae Young Park
Journal:  Korean J Urol       Date:  2010-05-19

Review 6.  Early prostate-specific antigen changes and the diagnosis and prognosis of prostate cancer.

Authors:  George Botchorishvili; Mika P Matikainen; Hans Lilja
Journal:  Curr Opin Urol       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 2.309

Review 7.  Systematic review of pretreatment prostate-specific antigen velocity and doubling time as predictors for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Andrew J Vickers; Caroline Savage; M Frank O'Brien; Hans Lilja
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2008-12-08       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 8.  Biomarkers for prostate cancer: present challenges and future opportunities.

Authors:  Pranav Sharma; Kamran Zargar-Shoshtari; Julio M Pow-Sang
Journal:  Future Sci OA       Date:  2015-12-17

9.  Heterogeneous patterns of DNA methylation-based field effects in histologically normal prostate tissue from cancer patients.

Authors:  Mia Møller; Siri Hundtofte Strand; Kamilla Mundbjerg; Gangning Liang; Inderbir Gill; Christa Haldrup; Michael Borre; Søren Høyer; Torben Falck Ørntoft; Karina Dalsgaard Sørensen
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-01-13       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Development and validation of risk score for predicting positive repeat prostate biopsy in patients with a previous negative biopsy in a UK population.

Authors:  Mark A Rochester; Nora Pashayan; Fiona Matthews; Andrew Doble; John McLoughlin
Journal:  BMC Urol       Date:  2009-07-16       Impact factor: 2.264

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.