BACKGROUND: Although a field effect in which transformed cells extend beyond morphologically evident tumor has been proposed in cancer, little direct evidence exists as to its magnitude and spatial resolution. We tested this hypothesis using molecular techniques to detect epigenetic changes in the primary tumor and surrounding tissues. METHODS: Ex vivo core biopsies, each spaced approximately 1 mm apart, were generated from 37 unique prostatectomy samples. The first core biopsy was confirmed to be histologically positive for cancer, and the subsequent biopsies were confirmed to be histologically negative. The methylation ratio of GSTP1, APC, RARbeta2, and RASSF1A were measured for all of the 159 cores. RESULTS: No field effect, defined as absence of epigenetically transformed cells, for GSTP1 was observed whereas APC, RARbeta2, and RASSF1A showed a field effect up to 3 mm from the malignant core in three prostatectomy samples. Furthermore, for each case, different patterns of the field effect were observed. The field effect appeared most pronounced with RARbeta2. In 11 prostatectomy samples in which a second focus of cancer was identified, cells harboring RARbeta2 methylation extended a large distance away from the primary tumor in one sample. Bisulfite sequencing of RARbeta2 confirmed the presence of epigenetic aberrations. CONCLUSIONS: This study quantifies previous observations of methylation in histologically negative samples and provides important assessment of field effects based on epigenetic events in cancer. These molecular approaches set the stage for consideration of such data in prospective trials for assessment of surgical margins and prediction of recurrence.
BACKGROUND: Although a field effect in which transformed cells extend beyond morphologically evident tumor has been proposed in cancer, little direct evidence exists as to its magnitude and spatial resolution. We tested this hypothesis using molecular techniques to detect epigenetic changes in the primary tumor and surrounding tissues. METHODS: Ex vivo core biopsies, each spaced approximately 1 mm apart, were generated from 37 unique prostatectomy samples. The first core biopsy was confirmed to be histologically positive for cancer, and the subsequent biopsies were confirmed to be histologically negative. The methylation ratio of GSTP1, APC, RARbeta2, and RASSF1A were measured for all of the 159 cores. RESULTS: No field effect, defined as absence of epigenetically transformed cells, for GSTP1 was observed whereas APC, RARbeta2, and RASSF1A showed a field effect up to 3 mm from the malignant core in three prostatectomy samples. Furthermore, for each case, different patterns of the field effect were observed. The field effect appeared most pronounced with RARbeta2. In 11 prostatectomy samples in which a second focus of cancer was identified, cells harboring RARbeta2 methylation extended a large distance away from the primary tumor in one sample. Bisulfite sequencing of RARbeta2 confirmed the presence of epigenetic aberrations. CONCLUSIONS: This study quantifies previous observations of methylation in histologically negative samples and provides important assessment of field effects based on epigenetic events in cancer. These molecular approaches set the stage for consideration of such data in prospective trials for assessment of surgical margins and prediction of recurrence.
Authors: Bruce J Trock; Michelle J Brotzman; Leslie A Mangold; Joseph W Bigley; Jonathan I Epstein; David McLeod; Eric A Klein; J Stephen Jones; Songbai Wang; Theresa McAskill; Jyoti Mehrotra; Bhargavi Raghavan; Alan W Partin Journal: BJU Int Date: 2011-11-11 Impact factor: 5.588
Authors: Vadim Backman; Hemant K Roy; Andrew J Radosevich; Nikhil N Mutyal; Adam Eshein; The-Quyen Nguyen; Bradley Gould; Jeremy D Rogers; Michael J Goldberg; Laura K Bianchi; Eugene F Yen; Vani Konda; Douglas K Rex; Jacques Van Dam Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2015-05-19 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Seong O Suh; Yi Chen; Mohd Saif Zaman; Hiroshi Hirata; Soichiro Yamamura; Varahram Shahryari; Jan Liu; Z Laura Tabatabai; Sanjay Kakar; Guoren Deng; Yuichiro Tanaka; Rajvir Dahiya Journal: Carcinogenesis Date: 2011-02-23 Impact factor: 4.944
Authors: Kirk J Wojno; Frank J Costa; Robert J Cornell; Jeffrey D Small; Erik Pasin; Wim Van Criekinge; Joseph W Bigley; Leander Van Neste Journal: Am Health Drug Benefits Date: 2014-05
Authors: Matthew Truong; Bing Yang; Andrew Livermore; Jennifer Wagner; Puspha Weeratunga; Wei Huang; Rajiv Dhir; Joel Nelson; Daniel W Lin; David F Jarrard Journal: J Urol Date: 2012-11-15 Impact factor: 7.450
Authors: Deliang Tang; Oleksandr N Kryvenko; Nicoleta Mitrache; Kieu C Do; Michelle Jankowski; Dhananjay A Chitale; Sheri Trudeau; Andrew Rundle; Steven A Belinsky; Benjamin A Rybicki Journal: J Urol Date: 2013-01-30 Impact factor: 7.450
Authors: Ken Kron; Vaijayanti Pethe; Laurent Briollais; Bekim Sadikovic; Hilmi Ozcelik; Alia Sunderji; Vasundara Venkateswaran; Jehonathan Pinthus; Neil Fleshner; Theodorus van der Kwast; Bharati Bapat Journal: PLoS One Date: 2009-03-13 Impact factor: 3.240