Literature DB >> 22077190

Evaluation of palatal bone density in adults and adolescents for application of skeletal anchorage devices.

Seong Han1, Mohamed Bayome, Jeongwon Lee, Yoon-Jin Lee, Hae-Hiang Song, Yoon-Ah Kook.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To measure the cortical and cancellous bone densities of the palatal area in adolescents and adults and to compare bone quality among placement sites of temporary anchorage devices.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred twenty cone beam computerized tomography scans were obtained from 60 adolescents (mean age, 12.2 ± 1.9 years) and 60 adults (24.7 ± 4.9 years). The measurements of palatal bone density were made in Hounsfield units (HU) at 72 sites at the intersections of eight mediolateral and nine anterioposterior reference lines using InVivoDental software. Repeated-measures analysis of variance was used to analyze intragroup and intergroup differences.
RESULTS: The cortical and cancellous bone densities in the adults (816 and 154 HU, respectively) were significantly higher than those in the adolescents (606 and 135 HU; P < .001 and P  =  .032, respectively). However, the anterior portion of the cortical bone in adolescents had similar density values to the posterior portion of the cortical bone in adults. Gender comparison revealed that females had greater cortical bone densities (769 HU) than their male counterparts did (654 HU; P < .001).
CONCLUSIONS: Palatal bone densities were significantly higher in adults than in adolescents, and the anterior palatal areas of adolescents were of similar values to those at the posterior palate of adults.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22077190      PMCID: PMC8845559          DOI: 10.2319/071311-445.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Angle Orthod        ISSN: 0003-3219            Impact factor:   2.079


  38 in total

1.  Density of bone: effect on treatment plans, surgical approach, healing, and progressive boen loading.

Authors:  C E Misch
Journal:  Int J Oral Implantol       Date:  1990

2.  Bone density assessments of dental implant sites: 2. Quantitative cone-beam computerized tomography.

Authors:  Prasit Aranyarachkul; Joseph Caruso; Bernard Gantes; Eloy Schulz; Matt Riggs; Ivan Dus; Jason M Yamada; Max Crigger
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants       Date:  2005 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.804

3.  Quantitative evaluation of cortical bone thickness with computed tomographic scanning for orthodontic implants.

Authors:  Toru Deguchi; Miho Nasu; Kaoru Murakami; Toshinori Yabuuchi; Hiroshi Kamioka; Teruko Takano-Yamamoto
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 2.650

4.  Which region of the median palate is a suitable location of temporary orthodontic anchorage devices? A histomorphometric study on human cadavers aged 15-20 years.

Authors:  Philipp Stockmann; Karl Andreas Schlegel; Safwan Srour; Friedrich Wilhelm Neukam; Matthias Fenner; Endre Felszeghy
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 5.977

5.  Use of palatal miniscrew anchorage and lingual multi-bracket appliances to enhance efficiency of molar scissors-bite correction.

Authors:  Nagato Tamamura; Shingo Kuroda; Yasuyo Sugawara; Teruko Takano-Yamamoto; Takashi Yamashiro
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 2.079

6.  Bone density at interradicular sites: implications for orthodontic mini-implant placement.

Authors:  Y S Chun; W H Lim
Journal:  Orthod Craniofac Res       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 1.826

7.  A palatal locking plate anchor for orthodontic tooth movement.

Authors:  Yasoo Watanabe; Keisuke Miyamoto
Journal:  J Clin Orthod       Date:  2009-07

8.  The use of palatal implants for orthodontic anchorage. Design and clinical application of the orthosystem.

Authors:  H Wehrbein; B R Merz; P Diedrich; J Glatzmaier
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 5.977

9.  Density of the alveolar and basal bones of the maxilla and the mandible.

Authors:  Hyo-Sang Park; Youn-Ju Lee; Seong-Hwa Jeong; Tae-Geon Kwon
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 2.650

10.  A retrospective analysis of the failure rate of three different orthodontic skeletal anchorage systems.

Authors:  Yi-Jane Chen; Hao-Hueng Chang; Chi-Yin Huang; Hsin-Chia Hung; Eddie Hsiang-Hua Lai; Chung-Chen Jane Yao
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2007-09-14       Impact factor: 5.977

View more
  11 in total

1.  New approach of maxillary protraction using modified C-palatal plates in Class III patients.

Authors:  Yoon-Ah Kook; Mohamed Bayome; Jae Hyun Park; Ki Beom Kim; Seong-Hun Kim; Kyu-Rhim Chung
Journal:  Korean J Orthod       Date:  2015-07-24       Impact factor: 1.372

2.  Evaluation of opening pattern and bone neoformation at median palatal suture area in patients submitted to surgically assisted rapid maxillary expansion (SARME) through cone beam computed tomography.

Authors:  Daniel Gomes Salgueiro; Vitor Hugo Leite de Oliveira Rodrigues; Victor Tieghi Neto; Carolina Carmo de Menezes; Eduardo Sanches Gonçales; Osny Ferreira Júnior
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2015 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.698

3.  Palatal bone thickness measured by palatal index method using cone-beam computed tomography in nonorthodontic patients for placement of mini-implants.

Authors:  W S Manjula; R V Murali; S Kishore Kumar; Faizal Tajir; K Mahalakshmi
Journal:  J Pharm Bioallied Sci       Date:  2015-04

4.  Predictability of bone density at posterior mandibular implant sites using cone-beam computed tomography intensity values.

Authors:  Mustafa Alkhader; Malik Hudieb; Yousef Khader
Journal:  Eur J Dent       Date:  2017 Jul-Sep

5.  Comparison of treatment effects between the modified C-palatal plate and cervical pull headgear for total arch distalization in adults.

Authors:  Chong Ook Park; Noor Laith Sa'aed; Mohamed Bayome; Jae Hyun Park; Yoon-Ah Kook; Young-Seok Park; Seong Ho Han
Journal:  Korean J Orthod       Date:  2017-09-29       Impact factor: 1.372

6.  Gender and growth variation in palatal bone thickness and density for mini-implant placement.

Authors:  Sumit Yadav; Emily Sachs; Meenakshi Vishwanath; Kristen Knecht; Madhur Upadhyay; Ravindra Nanda; Aditya Tadinada
Journal:  Prog Orthod       Date:  2018-11-05       Impact factor: 2.750

7.  Pattern of buccal and palatal bone density in the maxillary premolar region: an anatomical basis of anterior-middle superior alveolar (AMSA) anesthetic technique.

Authors:  Abdul Ahad; Ekramul Haque; Sabiha Naaz; Afshan Bey; Sajjad Abdur Rahman
Journal:  J Dent Anesth Pain Med       Date:  2020-12-28

8.  Evaluation of the palatal bone in different facial patterns for orthodontic mini-implants insertion: A cone-beam computed tomography study.

Authors:  José Antonio Vidalón; Carlos Liñan; Lidia Yileng Tay; Abraham Meneses; Manuel Lagravère
Journal:  Dental Press J Orthod       Date:  2021-03-22

9.  Quantitative evaluation of alveolar cortical bone density in adults with different vertical facial types using cone-beam computed tomography.

Authors:  Fulya Ozdemir; Murat Tozlu; Derya Germec Cakan
Journal:  Korean J Orthod       Date:  2014-01-17       Impact factor: 1.372

10.  Displacement and stress distribution of the maxillofacial complex during maxillary protraction using palatal plates: A three-dimensional finite element analysis.

Authors:  Jusuk Eom; Mohamed Bayome; Jae Hyun Park; Hee Jin Lim; Yoon-Ah Kook; Seong Ho Han
Journal:  Korean J Orthod       Date:  2018-08-08       Impact factor: 1.372

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.