Literature DB >> 18174068

Density of the alveolar and basal bones of the maxilla and the mandible.

Hyo-Sang Park1, Youn-Ju Lee, Seong-Hwa Jeong, Tae-Geon Kwon.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this investigation was to quantitatively evaluate density of the alveolar and basal bones of the maxilla and the mandible.
METHODS: Sixty-three sets of computed tomographic (CT) images were selected, and bone density was measured with V-Works imaging software (Cybermed, Seoul, Korea). The sample consisted of 23 men (ages, 29 +/- 10.9 years) and 40 women (ages, 25.6 +/- 7.6 years). Cortical and cancellous bone densities at the alveolar and basal bones at the incisor, canine, premolar, molar, and maxillary tuberosity/retromolar areas were measured.
RESULTS: The cortical bone density of the maxilla ranged approximately between 810 and 940 Hounsfield units (HU) at the alveolar bone except for the maxillary tuberosity (443 HU at the buccal and 615 HU at the palatal alveolar bone), and between 835 and 1113 HU at the basal cortical bone except for tuberosity (542 HU). The cortical bone density of the mandible ranged between 800 and 1580 HU at the alveolar bone and 1320 and 1560 HU at the basal bone. The highest bone density in the maxilla was observed in the canine and premolar areas, and maxillary tuberosity showed the lowest bone density. Density of the cortical bone was greater in the mandible than in the maxilla and showed a progressive increase from the incisor to the retromolar area.
CONCLUSIONS: These data might provide valuable information when selecting sites and placement methods for miniscrew or microscrew implants in the dental arch.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18174068     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2006.01.044

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop        ISSN: 0889-5406            Impact factor:   2.650


  47 in total

1.  Surface characteristics and mechanical behavior of retrieved orthodontic microimplants.

Authors:  Lu Lu; Hyo-Sang Park
Journal:  J Zhejiang Univ Sci B       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 3.066

2.  Tooth movement rate and anchorage lost during canine retraction: A maxillary and mandibular comparison.

Authors:  Andre da C Monini; Luiz G Gandini; Alexandre P Vianna; Renato P Martins; Helder B Jacob
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2019-02-11       Impact factor: 2.079

Review 3.  Bone density and its importance in orthodontics.

Authors:  Tina Chugh; Abhay Kumar Jain; Raj Kumar Jaiswal; Praveen Mehrotra; Rachita Mehrotra
Journal:  J Oral Biol Craniofac Res       Date:  2013-01-30

4.  A digital volumetric tomography (DVT) study in the mandibular molar region for miniscrew placement during mixed dentition.

Authors:  Mayur S Bhattad; Sudhindra Baliga; Pavan Vibhute
Journal:  Dental Press J Orthod       Date:  2015 Mar-Apr

5.  A Simple 2D Accurate Mini Implant Positioning Guide.

Authors:  Arun Kumar Dasari; Sushma Parimi; Kishore M S V; Nagam Reddy Shashidhar; Sathu Reddy Dharmender
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2014-07-20

Review 6.  Bone mineral density in cone beam computed tomography: Only a few shades of gray.

Authors:  Marcio José da Silva Campos; Thainara Salgueiro de Souza; Sergio Luiz Mota Júnior; Marcelo Reis Fraga; Robert Willer Farinazzo Vitral
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2014-08-28

7.  Estrogen deficiency increases variability of tissue mineral density of alveolar bone surrounding teeth.

Authors:  Matthew S Ames; Semi Hong; Hye Ri Lee; Henry W Fields; William M Johnston; Do-Gyoon Kim
Journal:  Arch Oral Biol       Date:  2010-06-11       Impact factor: 2.633

8.  Three-dimensional evaluation of upper anterior alveolar bone dehiscence after incisor retraction and intrusion in adult patients with bimaxillary protrusion malocclusion.

Authors:  Qing-Yuan Guo; Shi-jie Zhang; Hong Liu; Chun-ling Wang; Fu-lan Wei; Tao Lv; Na-na Wang; Dong-xu Liu
Journal:  J Zhejiang Univ Sci B       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 3.066

9.  The impact of occlusal function on structural adaptation in alveolar bone of the growing pig, Sus Scrofa.

Authors:  Kuang-Dah Yeh; Tracy Ellen Popowics
Journal:  Arch Oral Biol       Date:  2010-09-19       Impact factor: 2.633

10.  A comparitive clinical study between self tapping and drill free screws as a source of rigid orthodontic anchorage.

Authors:  Nishant Gupta; S M Kotrashetti; Vijay Naik
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2011-05-28
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.