Literature DB >> 22075171

Overall efficacy of HPV-16/18 AS04-adjuvanted vaccine against grade 3 or greater cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: 4-year end-of-study analysis of the randomised, double-blind PATRICIA trial.

Matti Lehtinen1, Jorma Paavonen, Cosette M Wheeler, Unnop Jaisamrarn, Suzanne M Garland, Xavier Castellsagué, S Rachel Skinner, Dan Apter, Paulo Naud, Jorge Salmerón, Song-Nan Chow, Henry Kitchener, Júlio C Teixeira, James Hedrick, Genara Limson, Anne Szarewski, Barbara Romanowski, Fred Y Aoki, Tino F Schwarz, Willy A J Poppe, Newton S De Carvalho, Maria Julieta V Germar, Klaus Peters, Adrian Mindel, Philippe De Sutter, F Xavier Bosch, Marie-Pierre David, Dominique Descamps, Frank Struyf, Gary Dubin.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or greater (CIN2+) is the surrogate endpoint used in licensure trials of human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccines. Vaccine efficacy against CIN3+, the immediate precursor to invasive cervical cancer, is more difficult to measure because of its lower incidence, but provides the most stringent evidence of potential cancer prevention. We report vaccine efficacy against CIN3+ and adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS) in the end-of-study analysis of PATRICIA (PApilloma TRIal against Cancer In young Adults).
METHODS: Healthy women aged 15-25 years with no more than six lifetime sexual partners were included in PATRICIA, irrespective of their baseline HPV DNA status, HPV-16 or HPV-18 serostatus, or cytology. Women were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive an HPV-16/18 AS04-adjuvanted vaccine or a control hepatitis A vaccine via an internet-based central randomisation system using a minimisation algorithm to account for age ranges and study sites. The patients and study investigators were masked to allocated vaccine. The primary endpoint of PATRICIA has been reported previously. In the present end-of-study analysis, we focus on CIN3+ and AIS in the populations of most clinical interest, the total vaccinated cohort (TVC) and the TVC-naive. The TVC comprised all women who received at least one vaccine dose, approximating catch-up populations and including sexually active women (vaccine n=9319; control=9325). The TVC-naive comprised women with no evidence of oncogenic HPV infection at baseline, approximating early adolescent HPV exposure (vaccine n=5824; control=5820). This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00122681.
FINDINGS: Vaccine efficacy against CIN3+ associated with HPV-16/18 was 100% (95% CI 85·5-100) in the TVC-naive and 45·7% (22·9-62·2) in the TVC. Vaccine efficacy against all CIN3+ (irrespective of HPV type in the lesion and including lesions with no HPV DNA detected) was 93·2% (78·9-98·7) in the TVC-naive and 45·6% (28·8-58·7) in the TVC. In the TVC-naive, vaccine efficacy against all CIN3+ was higher than 90% in all age groups. In the TVC, vaccine efficacy against all CIN3+ and CIN3+ associated with HPV-16/18 was highest in the 15-17 year age group and progressively decreased in the 18-20 year and 21-25 year age groups. Vaccine efficacy against all AIS was 100% (31·0-100) and 76·9% (16·0-95·8) in the TVC-naive and TVC, respectively. Serious adverse events occurred in 835 (9·0%) and 829 (8·9%) women in the vaccine and control groups, respectively; only ten events (0·1%) and five events (0·1%), respectively, were considered to be related to vaccination.
INTERPRETATION: PATRICIA end-of-study results show excellent vaccine efficacy against CIN3+ and AIS irrespective of HPV DNA in the lesion. Population-based vaccination that incorporates the HPV-16/18 vaccine and high coverage of early adolescents might have the potential to substantially reduce the incidence of cervical cancer. FUNDING: GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22075171     DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(11)70286-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet Oncol        ISSN: 1470-2045            Impact factor:   41.316


  238 in total

Review 1.  Virus-based nanoparticles as platform technologies for modern vaccines.

Authors:  Karin L Lee; Richard M Twyman; Steven Fiering; Nicole F Steinmetz
Journal:  Wiley Interdiscip Rev Nanomed Nanobiotechnol       Date:  2016-01-19

2.  Clarification on the impact of cervarix vaccination on human papillomavirus infection and cervical cancer in the United Kingdom.

Authors:  Darron Brown; Amit Sharad Kulkarni; Matt Pillsbury; Alain Luxembourg; Alfred Saah
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2016-07-02       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 3.  Vaccinations for Anal Squamous Cancer: Current and Emerging Therapies.

Authors:  John Berry; Sean C Glasgow
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2018-11-02

4.  Correlates of Human Papillomavirus Vaccination and Association with HPV-16 and HPV-18 DNA Detection in Young Women.

Authors:  Molly A Feder; Shalini L Kulasingam; Nancy B Kiviat; Constance Mao; Erik J Nelson; Rachel L Winer; Hilary K Whitham; John Lin; Stephen E Hawes
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2019-07-02       Impact factor: 2.681

5.  Human papillomavirus-16/18 AS04-adjuvanted vaccine (cervarix®): a guide to its two-dose schedule in girls aged 9-14 years in the EU.

Authors:  Katherine A Lyseng-Williamson
Journal:  Paediatr Drugs       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 3.022

Review 6.  Warts and all: human papillomavirus in primary immunodeficiencies.

Authors:  Jennifer W Leiding; Steven M Holland
Journal:  J Allergy Clin Immunol       Date:  2012-10-01       Impact factor: 10.793

7.  Human papillomavirus in high-grade cervical lesions: Austrian data of a European multicentre study.

Authors:  Lucia Rössler; Olaf Reich; Reinhard Horvat; Sabrina Collas de Souza; Katsyarina Holl; Elmar A Joura
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2013-09-17       Impact factor: 1.704

8.  Knowledge, attitude, and uptake related to human papillomavirus vaccination among young women in Germany recruited via a social media site.

Authors:  Cornelius Remschmidt; Dietmar Walter; Patrick Schmich; Matthias Wetzstein; Yvonne Deleré; Ole Wichmann
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2014-10-30       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 9.  Making HPV vaccination available to girls everywhere.

Authors:  Austin M Oberlin; Lisa Rahangdale; Lameck Chinula; Nurain M Fuseini; Carla J Chibwesha
Journal:  Int J Gynaecol Obstet       Date:  2018-09-12       Impact factor: 3.561

10.  Durability of Cross-Protection by Different Schedules of the Bivalent HPV Vaccine: The CVT Trial.

Authors:  Sabrina H Tsang; Joshua N Sampson; John Schussler; Carolina Porras; Sarah Wagner; Joseph Boland; Bernal Cortes; Douglas R Lowy; John T Schiller; Mark Schiffman; Troy J Kemp; Ana Cecilia Rodriguez; Wim Quint; Mitchell H Gail; Ligia A Pinto; Paula Gonzalez; Allan Hildesheim; Aimée R Kreimer; Rolando Herrero
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2020-10-01       Impact factor: 13.506

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.